ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Use of the Organic Fraction of Urban Solid Waste to Recover Degraded Areas in Chilca, Peru
 
More details
Hide details
1
Universidad de Buenos Aires - Facultad de Ingeniería - Instituto de Ingeniería Sanitaria - Buenos Aires, Argentina
 
2
Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Ambiente, Av. Mariscal Castilla N° 3909-4089, Huancayo, Perú
 
3
Universidad Nacional de Huancavelica, Facultad de Ingeniería Electrónica-Sistemas, Jr. La Mar N° 755, Pampas Tayacaja, Huancavelica, Perú
 
 
Submission date: 2023-06-16
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-02-04
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-03-19
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-07-19
 
 
Publication date: 2025-01-02
 
 
Corresponding author
Rosa Haydeé Zárate-Quiñones   

Medio Ambiente, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, Peru
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(1):151-164
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The treatment of municipal solid waste (MSW) in Peru and some parts of the world is still incipient, mainly due to the lack of technologies implemented to recover this waste; another important cause in Peru is the lack of studies for the treatment of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). The objectives of this work were: (i) to determine the generation of OFMSW, (ii) to produce quality compost and (iii) to estimate the application rate for the recovery of degraded surfaces. Tools and instruments acquired from the Institute of Sanitary Engineering of FIUBA and the Ministry of the Environment were used to measure physicochemical parameters and environmental estimates. The results showed a per capita MSW generation of 0.472 kg/inhab/day, of which 42.87% was composed of OFMSW or organic fraction of MSW; a feasible availability of organic matter for composting of 6783.79 t/year was determined. The composting experiment was carried out with waste segregated at the MSW treatment plant, installing composting piles with-structurants (WE) consisting of shavings, sawdust and garden waste, and no-structurants (NS). Despite the unfavorable climatic conditions of the region, the maturity and physicochemical properties of the compost were similar to MSW composts recorded elsewhere, with few differences between NS and WE. The main limitation of compost quality was the concentration of heavy metals Cd, Pb and Zn, which were close to or above the limits established in several regulations, which can be significantly reduced by segregating the OFMSW at source. Annual limits and cumulative load limits were used for 10-year applications, the calculated precautionary doses were 25 t/ha/year and 85 t/ha for 10 years in dry weight; correcting for moisture content, the precautionary dose was 40 t/ha/year in wet weight. Depending on the organic fraction of MSW available, compost production and the precautionary dose, 60 to 80 ha/year of degraded agricultural areas and forest plantation nurseries could be recovered with compost; using lower doses it is possible to cover a larger area. From the results, the work provides valuable information to elaborate an integrated MSW management plan, closing the cycle of production, treatment and beneficial use.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (40)
1.
SAADATLU E.A., BARZINPOUR F., YAGHOUBI S. A sustainable municipal solid waste system under leachate treatment impact along with leakage control and source separation. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 169, 982, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep....
 
2.
ZHOU W., DAN Z. Comparison and selection of municipal solid waste treatment technologies in Tibet plateau area. SN Applied Sciences, 5 (2), 50, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452....
 
3.
ZHANG Y., WANG L., CHEN L., MA B., ZHANG Y., NI W., TSANG D.C.W. Treatment of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash: State-of-the-art technologies and future perspectives. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 411, 125132, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhaz... PMid:33858099.
 
4.
SHAH H.H., AMIN M., PEPE F. Maximizing resource efficiency: opportunities for energy recovery from municipal solid waste in Europe. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 25 (5), 2766, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163....
 
5.
RETUERTO M.G., ESPINOZA D.Y., ANDRADEARENAS L. System Dynamics Modeling for Solid Waste Management in Lima Peru. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), 12 (7), 2021. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACS....
 
6.
ORTIZ-ALVAREZ C., ALFARO-CORDOVA E., BIELLI A., MANGEL J.C., ALFARO-SHIGUETO J. Solid waste assessment in a coastal fishing community in Peru. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 178, 113632, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marp... PMid:35405486.
 
7.
BABU R., PRIETO VERAMENDI P.M., RENE E.R. Strategies for resource recovery from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 3, 100098, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csce....
 
8.
FERNÁNDEZ-GONZÁLEZ J.M., DÍAZ-LÓPEZ C., MARTÍN-PASCUAL J., ZAMORANO M. Recycling Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste: Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends. Sustainability, 12 (4798), 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1211....
 
9.
ZAMRI M.F.M.A., HASMADY S., AKHIAR A., IDERIS F., SHAMSUDDIN A.H., MOFIJUR M., FATTAH I.M.R., MAHLIA T.M.I. A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137, 110637, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser....
 
10.
YONG Z.J., BASHIR M.J.K., HASSAN M.S. Biogas and biofertilizer production from organic fraction municipal solid waste for sustainable circular economy and environmental protection in Malaysia. Science of The Total Environment, 776, 145961, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:33640552.
 
11.
ESPINOZA-GUILLEN J.A., ALDERETE-MALPARTIDA M.B., ESCOBAR-MENDOZA J.E., NAVARRO-ABARCA U.F., SILVA-CASTRO K.A., MARTINEZ-MERCADO P.L. Identifying contamination of heavy metals in soils of Peruvian Amazon plain: use of multivariate statistical techniques. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194 (11), 817, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661... PMid:36131105.
 
12.
MEF Guidelines for the fulfillment of Goal 2 of the 2019 Municipal Management Improvement Incentive Program, 2019.
 
13.
MINAM Guidance for the fulfillment of goal 36, 2022.
 
14.
MINAM Guía para el cumplimiento de la Meta del Programa de Incentivos a la Mejora de la Gestión Municipal correspondiente al año 2022, 2022.
 
15.
MINAM National Map of Degraded Areas in Terrestrial Ecosystems Descriptive Report, 2019.
 
16.
WELIGAMA THUPPAHIGE R.T., GHEEWALA S.H., BABEL S. Environmental impact of organic fraction of municipal solid waste treatment by composting in Sri Lanka. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 24 (1), 189, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163....
 
17.
MINAM Municipal Solid Waste Management Indicators, 2023.
 
18.
SAILER G., EICHERMÜLLER J., POETSCH J., PACZKOWSKI S., PELZ S., OECHSNER H., MÜLLER J. Characterization of the separately collected organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) from rural and urban districts for a one-year period in Germany. Waste Management, 131, 471, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasm... PMid:34273612 PMCid:PMC8601998.
 
19.
SINIA Viewer of environmental information on the presence of the environmental sector in the departments of Peru. Lima, 2023.
 
20.
ALI H., LETA S., HUSSEN A., ALEMU T. Resource recovery potential from source-separated organic municipal solid waste: opportunities for organic fertilizer production and creating sustainable urban agriculture in Ethiopia. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 25 (4), 2417, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163....
 
21.
INEI Censos Nacionales 2017: XII de Población, VII de Vivienda y III de Comunidades Indígenas. Documento Perú: Características de las viviendas particulares y los hogares. Acceso a servicios básicos, 2017 [in Spanish].
 
22.
PALANIVEL T.M., SULAIMAN H. Generation and Composition of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in Muscat, Sultanate of Oman. APCBEE Procedia, 10, 96, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcb....
 
23.
XIN X., ZHANG J., ZHU A., ZHANG C. Effects of longterm (23 years) mineral fertilizer and compost application on physical properties of fluvo-aquic soil in the North China Plain. Soil and Tillage Research, 156, 166, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stil....
 
24.
EPA Standards for Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge from Environmental Protection. USA, 1993.
 
25.
QU J., ZHANG L., ZHANG X., GAO L., TIAN Y. Biochar combined with gypsum reduces both nitrogen and carbon losses during agricultural waste composting and enhances overall compost quality by regulating microbial activities and functions. Bioresource Technology, 314, 123781, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bior... PMid:32652451.
 
26.
MODDERMAN C. Composting with or without Additives. In Animal Manure: Production, Characteristics, Environmental Concerns, and Management; H.M. Waldrip, P.H. Pagliari, Z. He, ASA Special Publications, Volume 67, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspe....
 
27.
OSHINS C., MICHEL F., LOUIS P., RICHARD T.L., RYNK R. Chapter 3 - The composting process. Academic Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0....
 
28.
AGUSTINA W., SRIHARTI Composting of grass clippings using different commercial microbial activators. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 462 (1), 12002, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1....
 
29.
ZHOU Y., KUMAR V., HARIRCHI S., VIGNESWARAN V.S., RAJENDRAN K., SHARMA P., WAH TONG Y., BINOD P., SINDHU R., SARSAIYA S., BALAKRISHNAN D., MOFIJUR M., ZHANG Z., TAHERZADEH M.J., KUMAR AWASTHI M. Recovery of value-added products from biowaste: A review. Bioresource Technology, 360, 127565, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bior... PMid:35788392.
 
30.
SRIVASTAVA A.N., CHAKMA S. Bioavailability reduction of heavy metals through dual mode anaerobic Co-landfilling of municipal solid waste and industrial organic sludge. Chemical Engineering Journal, 439, 135725, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.....
 
31.
BERNAL M.P., GÓMEZ X., CHANG R., ARCOLÁZARO E., CLEMENTE R. Strategies for the use of plant biomass obtained in the phytostabilisation of trace-element-contaminated soils. Biomass and Bioenergy, 126, 220, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biom....
 
32.
VERGARA CID C., FERREYROA G.V., PIGNATA M.L., RODRIGUEZ J.H. Biosolid compost amendment increases soil fertility and soybean growth. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 44 (8), 1131, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/019041....
 
33.
GOTTSCHALL R., THELEN-JÜNGLING M., KRANERT M., KEHRES B. Suitability of Biowaste and Green Waste Composts for Organic Farming in Germany and the Resulting Utilization Potentials. Agriculture, 13, 740, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/agricu....
 
34.
HANG S., CASTÁN E., NEGRO G., DAGHERO A., BUFFA E., RINGUELET A., SATTI P., MAZZARINO M.J. Composting of feedlot manure with sawdustwoodshavings: process and quality of the final product. Agriscientia, 32 (1), 55, 2015. https://doi.org/10.31047/1668.....
 
35.
RAVINDRAN B., KARMEGAM N., AWASTHI M.K., CHANG S.W., SELVI P.K., BALACHANDAR R., CHINNAPPAN S., AZELEE N.I.W., MUNUSWAMYRAMANUJAM G. Valorization of food waste and poultry manure through co-composting amending saw dust, biochar and mineral salts for value-added compost production. Bioresource Technology, 346, 126442, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bior... PMid:34848334.
 
36.
RAHMAN M.M., BHUIYAN M.S.H., ROUF M.A., SARKER R.R., RASHID M.H. Quality Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Compost. Acta Chemica Malaysia, 4 (1), 33, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2478/acmy-2....
 
37.
YADAV P., YADAV S., SINGH D., SHEKHER GIRI B., MISHRA P.K. Barriers in biogas production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A circular bioeconomy perspective. Bioresource Technology, 362, 127671, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bior... PMid:35914674.
 
38.
LIU Z., GE L., LI S., PAN R., LIU X. Kitchen Waste Compost's Impact on Rice Quality, Yield, and Soil Environment. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 32 (4), 3225, 2023. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes....
 
39.
SARDARMEHNI M., LEVIS J.W., BARLAZ M.A. What Is the Best End Use for Compost Derived from the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste? Environmental Science & Technology, 55 (1), 73, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.es... PMid:33300346.
 
40.
CAMPUZANO R., GONZÁLEZ MARTÍNEZ S. Characteristics of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and methane production: A review. Waste Management, 54 (August), 3, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasm... PMid:27236403.
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top