ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Could Tax Collection and Management Improve the Green TFP of Enterprises: Evidence Based on China’s “Third Phase of the Golden Tax Project”
,
 
Fan Qi 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
SuZhou Chien-Shiung Institute of Technology, Suzhou 215127, China
 
 
Submission date: 2024-02-14
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-02-18
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-03-05
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-06-14
 
 
Publication date: 2025-01-02
 
 
Corresponding author
Fan Qi   

SuZhou Chien-Shiung Institute of Technology, Suzhou 215127, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(1):139-149
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The green TFP of enterprises is an important indicator for measuring high-quality development. As a means for the government to regulate the market economy, tax collection and management will inevitably affect the green and high-quality development of enterprises. We collect “the Third Phase of the Golden Tax Project” data and match it with A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2010 to 2019 to investigate the impact of changes in tax collection and management intensity on the green TFP of enterprises. We find that an increase in tax collection and management intensity significantly reduces the green TFP of enterprises, but this phenomenon is mainly reflected in state-owned enterprises and coastal areas. Further analysis shows that the reduction in green TFP can be attributed to reduced enterprise cash flow and green innovation. The research findings of this article provide certain insights for green growth and high-quality development.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (18)
1.
GORDON R., LI W. Tax Structures in Developing Countries: Many Puzzles and a Possible Explanation. Journal of Public Economics. 93 (7-8), 855, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpub....
 
2.
CASABURI L., TROIANO U. Ghost-house Busters: The Electoral Response to a Large Anti-tax Evasion Program. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 131 (1), 273, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qj....
 
3.
BIRD R., ZOLT E. Technology and Taxation in Developing Countries: From Hand to Mouse. National Tax Journal. 61 (4), 791, 2008. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2....
 
4.
XU C. The Fundamental Institutions of China's Reforms and Development. Journal of Economic Literature. 49 (4), 1076, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49....
 
5.
XIAO C., SHAO Y. Information system and corporate income tax enforcement: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 39 (6), 106772, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc....
 
6.
LI J., WANG X., WU Y. Can government improve tax compliance by adopting advanced information technology? Evidence from the golden tax project III in China. Economic Modelling. 93, 384, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ....
 
7.
ZHANG C., LIU H., BRESSERS H., BUCHANAN K. Productivity Growth and Environmental Regulations-Accounting for Undesirable Outputs: Analysis of China's Thirty Provincial Regions Using the Malmquist-Luenberger Index. Ecological Economics. 70 (12), 2369, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
8.
XIE R., YUAN Y., HUANG J. Different Types of Environmental Regulations and Heterogeneous Influence on "Green" Productivity: Evidence from China. Ecological Economics. 132 (2), 104, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
9.
WANG Y., SHEN N. Environmental Regulation and Environmental Productivity: The Case of China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 62 (9), 758, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser....
 
10.
PETR S., VINCENT S. Reviving American Entrepreneurship? Tax Reform and Business Dynamism. Journal of Monetary Economics. 105, 94, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmon....
 
11.
ABHIROOP M., MANPREET S., ALMINAS A. Do Corporate Taxes Hinder Innovation. Journal of Financial Economics. 124 (1), 195, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfin....
 
12.
YOUNGDEOK L. Tax Avoidance, Cost of Debt and Shareholder Activism: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Banking and Finance. 35 (2), 456, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jban....
 
13.
STOKEY N. R&D and economic growth. The Review of Economic Studies. 62 (3), 469, 1995. https://doi.org/10.2307/229803....
 
14.
ACEMOGLU D., ZILIBOTTI F. Productivity differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 116 (2), 563, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355....
 
15.
FENG P., KE S. Self-selection and Performance of R&D Input of Heterogeneous Firms: Evidence from China's Manufacturing Industries. China Economic Review. 41, 181, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chie....
 
16.
OH D., HESHMATI A. A Sequential Malmquist-Luenberger Productivity Index: Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Growth Considering the Progressive Nature of Technology. Energy Economics. 32 (6), 1345, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
17.
JACOBSON L., LALONDE R., SULLIVAN D. Earnings losses of displaced workers. American Economic Review. 83 (4), 685, 1993. https://doi.org/10.17848/wp92-....
 
18.
CAI X., LU Y., WU M. Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Journal of Development Economics. 123, 73, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdev....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top