ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Analysis of Interrelationship between Shrubs and Herbs Using Maximum Entropy
,
 
,
 
Bo Wu 2
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, People’s Republic of China
 
2
Institute of Desertification Studies, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, People’s Republic of China
 
 
Submission date: 2025-08-27
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-11-26
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-12-08
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-05-14
 
 
Corresponding author
Chengfu Zhang   

College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, People’s Republic of China
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
A scientifically robust classification of biogeographical regions, along with research on their interdependencies, is essential for enhancing our understanding of biodiversity dynamics, ecological conservation, and natural resource management. In this study, we partitioned the biogeographic regions of Inner Mongolia’s desert-steppe ecotone using the Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) model. The results indicated that the study area could be divided into shrub and herb regions. The model effectively simulated the potential distributions, yielding an area under the curve >0.8. The contribution of biological interactions to the shrub and herb regions was relatively high, reaching 34.8% for both shrubs and herbs. The two regions primarily compete for precipitation during the wettest month, with optimal precipitation ranges of 10.12-65.01 mm for shrubs and 26.90-86.90 mm for herbs. When biological effects were incorporated into the model, the distribution areas of both regions decreased, although their average suitability remained stable. This study quantitatively validates the significance of biological factors through modeling and provides a data-driven foundation for the development of regional conservation strategies.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (46)
1.
VILHENA D.A., ANTONELLI A. A network approach for identifying and delimiting biogeographical regions. Nature Communications. 6, 6848, 2015.
 
2.
MORRONE J.J. The spectre of biogeographical regionalization. Journal of Biogeography. 45 (2), 282, 2018.
 
3.
HOLT B.G., LESSARD J.P., BORREGARD M.K., FRITZ S.A., ARAÚJO M.B., DIMITROV D., FABRE P.H., GRAHAM C.H., GRAVES G.R., JONSSON K.A., NOGUES-BRAVO D., WANG Z.H., WHITTAKER R.J., FJELDSA J., RAHBEK C. An update of Wallace's zoogeographic regions of the world. Science. 339, 74, 2013.
 
4.
GROSS C.P., WRIGHT A.M., DARU B.H. A global biogeographic regionalization for butterflies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 380, 1917, 2025.
 
5.
GAO P., KUPFER J.A. Capitalizing on a wealth of spatial information: Improving biogeographic regionalization through the use of spatial clustering. Applied Geography. 99, 98, 2018.
 
6.
BOONE R.B. Hierarchical global plant biophysical regions as potential analysis units. Global Change Biology. 26 (6), 3689, 2020.
 
7.
ASAAD I., LUNDQUIST C.J., ERDMANN M.V., COSTELLO M.J. Ecological criteria to identify areas for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation. 213, 309, 2017.
 
8.
RIVA F., HADDAD N., FAHRIG L., BANKS-LEITE C. Principles for area-based biodiversity conservation. Ecology Letters. 27, e14459, 2024.
 
9.
LAMAS M.I.B., CARRERA A.L., BERTILLER M.B. Plant traits related to leaf decomposition processes in arid ecosystems of northern Patagonia. Journal of Plant Ecology. 12 (2), 216, 2019.
 
10.
LAMAS M.I.B., CARRERA A.L., BERTILLER M.B. Sheep grazing differentially affects the canopy attributes and functional diversity of shrubs and perennial grasses in arid rangelands. Plant Ecology. 222, 13, 2021.
 
11.
BARBIER N., COUTERON P., LEFEVER R., DEBLAUWE V., LEJEUNE O. Spatial decoupling of facilitation and competition at the origin of gapped vegetation patterns. Ecology. 89 (6), 1521, 2008.
 
12.
DOUDA J., DOYDOVA J., HULIK J., HAVRDOVA A., BOUBLIK K. Reduced competition enhances community temporal stability under conditions of increasing environmental stress. Ecology. 99 (10), 2207, 2018.
 
13.
XIE L.N., HAN L., GUO H.Y., ZHAO F., GAO F.L., ZHANG G.G., MA C.C. Shrubs facilitate herbaceous communities in a desert by modifying soil properties. Plant and Soil. 491 (1/2), 161, 2023.
 
14.
EL-BANA M.I., NIJS I., KOCKELBERGH F. Microenvironmental and vegetational heterogeneity induced by phytogenic nebkhas in an arid coastal ecosystem. Plant and Soil. 247 (2), 283, 2002.
 
15.
LINDBORG R., ERIKSSON O. Effects of Restoration on Plant Species Richness and Composition in Scandinavian Semi-Natural Grasslands. Restoration Ecology. 12 (3), 318, 2004.
 
16.
SALA O.E., GOLLUSCIO R.A., LAUENROTH W.K., SORIANO A. Resource partitioning between shrubs and grasses in the Patagonian steppe. Oecologia. 81 (4), 501, 1989.
 
17.
MCCARON J.K., KNAPP A.K. C3 woody plant expansion in a C4 grassland: are grasses and shrubs functionally distinct? American Journal of Botany. 88 (10), 1818, 2001.
 
18.
RODRIGUEZ M.V., BERTILLER M.B., BISIGATO A. Are fine roots of both shrubs and perennial grasses able to occupy the upper soil layer? A case study in the arid Patagonian Monte with non-seasonal precipitation. Plant and Soil. 300 (1-2), 281, 2007.
 
19.
WILSON S. Population Biology of Grasses: Competition between grasses and woody plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 45-56, 1998.
 
20.
YANG X.J., XIANG G.H., SUN W.C., CHI Y.G., LI W.H., BAI Y.F., ZHOU Z.C., ZHENG S.X. Shrub encroachment drives different responses of soil respiration to increased precipitation and N enrichment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 325, 109155, 2022.
 
21.
PIERCE N.A., ARCHER S.R., BESTELMEYER B.T. Competition suppresses shrubs during early, but not late, stages of arid grassland-shrubland state transition. Functional Ecology. 33 (8), 1480, 2019.
 
22.
LIU X.P., ZHOU W.M., LI X.X., ZHANG Y.M., DONG W.X. Secondary succession of shrub-herb communities in the hilly area of Taihang Mountain. Frontiers in Plant Science. 14, 1194083, 2023.
 
23.
MA B., SUN J. Predicting the distribution of Stipa purpurea across the Tibetan Plateau via the MaxEnt model. BMC Ecology. 18, 10, 2018.
 
24.
LI Y.X., SHAO W.H., JIANG J.M. Predicting the potential global distribution of Sapindus mukorossi under climate change based on MaxEnt modelling. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29, 21751, 2022.
 
25.
FENG X., PARK D.S., LIANG Y., PANDEY R., PAPEŞ M. Collinearity in ecological niche modeling: Confusions and challenges. Ecology and Evolution. 9 (18), 10365, 2019.
 
26.
NGAREGA N.K., CHAIBVA P., MASOCHA V.F., SAINA J.K., KHINE P.K., SCHNEIDER H. Application of MaxEnt modeling to evaluate the climate change effects on the geographic distribution of Lippia javanica (Burm.f.) Spreng in Africa. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 196, 62, 2024.
 
27.
SHARMA S., ARUNACHALAM K., BHAVSAR D., KALA R. Modeling habitat suitability of Perilla frutescens with MaxEnt in Uttarakhand-A conservation approach. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. 10, 99, 2018.
 
28.
SARANYA K.R.L., LAKSHMI T.V., REDDY C.S. Predicting the potential sites of Chromolaena odorata and Lantana camara in forest landscape of Eastern Ghats using habitat suitability models. Ecological Informatics. 66, 101455, 2021.
 
29.
DU Z.Y., HE Y.M., WANG H.T., WANG C., DUAN Y.Z. Potential geographical distribution and habitat shift of the genus Ammopiptanthus in China under current and future climate change based on the MaxEnt model. Journal of Arid Environments. 184 (9), 104328, 2021.
 
30.
XIN X.P., JIN D.Y., GE Y., WANG J.H., CHEN J.Q., QI J.G., CHU H., SHAO C.L., MURRAY P.J., ZHAO R.X., QIN Q., TANG H.J. Climate change dominated long-term soil carbon losses of Inner Mongolian grasslands. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 34 (10), e2020GB006559, 2020.
 
31.
DUAN Y.Z., BAI H.H., DU Z.Y., LIU Y., LI L.S., LU K., WANG Z.Y., DI L., QIN Y.Y., LIU A.P.M. Maxent modeling for predicting the potential distribution of Hippophae Linn species. Tropical Ecology. 66, 132, 2025.
 
32.
HANAFI-BOJD A.A., SHARIFIFARD M., JAHANIFARD E., NAVIDPOUR S., VAZIRIANZADEH B. Presence probability of Hemiscorpius lepturus Peters, 1861 using maximum entropy approach in the western areas of Zagros Mountains, Iran. Veterinary World. 13 (2), 296, 2020.
 
33.
AIDOO O.F., SOUZA P.G.C., SILVA R.S.D.S., SANTANA P.A., PICANO M.C., KYEREMATEN R., SETAMOU M., EKESI S., BORGEMEISTER C. Climate‐induced range shifts of invasive species (Diaphorina Citri Kuwayama). Pest Management Science. 78 (6), 2534, 2022.
 
34.
GROVES A.M., BRUDVIG L.A. Interannual variation in precipitation and other planting conditions impacts seedling establishment in sown plant communities. Restoration Ecology. 27, 128, 2019.
 
35.
STANICZENKO P.P.A., SIVASUBRAMANIAM P., SUTTLE K.B., PEARSON R.G. Linking macroecology and community ecology: refining predictions of species distributions using biotic interaction networks. Ecology Letters. 20 (6), 693, 2017.
 
36.
PAQUETTE A., HARGREAVES A.L. Biotic interactions are more often important at species' warm versus cool range edges. Ecology Letters. 24 (11), 2427, 2021.
 
37.
GALIANA N., LURGI M., MONTOYA J.M., ARAUJO M.B., GALBRAITH E.D. Climate or diet? The importance of biotic interactions in determining species range size. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 32 (7), 1178, 2023.
 
38.
FUNK J.L., LARSON J.E., BLAIR M.D., NGUYEN M.A., RIVERA B.J. Drought response in herbaceous plants: A test of the integrated framework of plant form and function. Functional Ecology. 38 (3), 679, 2024.
 
39.
PARHIZKAR M., SHABANPOUR M., MIRALLES I., CERDÀ A., TANAKA N., ASADI H., LUCAS-BORJA M.E., ZEMA D.A. Evaluating the effects of forest tree species on rill detachment capacity in a semi-arid environment. Ecological Engineering. 161, 106158, 2021.
 
40.
ZHOU Z.C., SHANGGUAN Z.P. Vertical distribution of fine roots in relation to soil factors in Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. forest of the Loess Plateau of China. Plant and Soil. 291, 119, 2006.
 
41.
SCHENK H.J., JACKSON R.B. Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below-ground/above-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. Journal of Ecology. 90, 480, 2002.
 
42.
JIANG L., LV G., GONG Y., LI Y., WANG H. Characteristics and driving mechanisms of species beta diversity in desert plant communities. PLOS ONE. 16 (1), e0245249, 2021.
 
43.
HOU H.Y., ZHOU J.W., LIU H.J., LI Y.H., CHANG C., WU H., XIONG W.D., LIU X.J., GAO S.B. Advances in the Study of Shrub-Herbs Interaction of Shrub Encroachment in Grassland. Chinese Journal of Grassland. 46, 132, 2024.
 
44.
WELTZI J.F., COUGHENOUR M.B. Savanna tree influence on understory vegetation and soil nutrients in northwestern Kenya. Journal of Vegetation Science. 1 (3), 325, 1990.
 
45.
ADLER P., RAFF D., LAUENROTH W. The effect of grazing on the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation. Oecologia. 128 (4), 465, 2001.
 
46.
BALING M., STUART-FOX D., BRUNTON D.H., DALE J. Habitat suitability for conservation translocation: The importance of considering camouflage in cryptic species. Biological Conservation. 203, 298, 2016.
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top