ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Assessing Near-Naturalness of Plant Communities in Urban Green Spaces Using Comprehensive Index and Random Forest Methods: A Case Study in Hefei, China
Dong Dong 1,2
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230022, China
 
2
Anhui Institute of Territory Spatial Planning and Ecology, Hefei 230022, China
 
 
Submission date: 2024-01-01
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-04-24
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-05-27
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-09-06
 
 
Publication date: 2025-04-04
 
 
Corresponding author
Fengquan Ji   

School of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230022, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(4):3607-3624
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
As urbanization rapidly progresses, the ecological resilience and health of urban parks and green spaces face significant threats, underscoring the crucial need for effective ecological quality assessments. This study developed a comprehensive evaluation system, uniquely designed with sixteen indicators across four dimensions – community composition, structure, succession, and disturbance – to systematically assess the near-naturalness of 87 urban park plant communities in central Hefei and to explore the influencing factors. Employing comprehensive index and random forest algorithms, we find the near-naturalness index ranging from 0.135 to 0.752, categorizing only 18.39% of samples as ‘nearnatural’ or ‘semi-natural,’ while a majority, 81.61%, fell into ‘far-natural’ or ‘artificial’ categories. Ideal near-natural conditions emerged in settings with 5 to 10 dead plants, litter cover of 10 to 30%, 10 to 15 species, and mild natural disturbances. Our findings indicate that the overall near-naturalness in Hefei’s urban green spaces is moderate to low, suggesting a need for focused enhancements in community succession and structural adjustments. This research establishes a novel framework for advancing urban green space ecological planning and sustainable development, providing fresh insights and a robust scientific basis for enhancing the ecological quality of urban parks and green spaces.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (85)
1.
FENG C.Y., SUN Z.Y., XU X.Q. Application of close-to-nature concept to landscaping. World Forestry Research, 26 (03), 58, 2013 [In Chinese].
 
2.
YANG Y.P., ZHOU Z.X. Theoretical basis and construction methods of urban nature-approximating landscape architecture. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 28 (03), 516, 2009 [In Chinese].
 
3.
REN R.B., LI S.H., YIN L.F., XU Z.Q. Planting design developed by simulating natural plant communities of Changshu. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 45 (12), 139, 2009 [In Chinese].
 
4.
WILDE H.D., GANDHI K.J., COLSON G. State of the science and challenges of breeding landscape plants with ecological function. Horticulture Research, 2, 14069, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/hortre... PMid:26504560 PMCid:PMC4596282.
 
5.
QIAN S., QI M., HUANG L., ZHAO L., LIN D., YANG Y. Biotic homogenization of China's urban greening: A meta-analysis on woody species. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 18, 25, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug....
 
6.
MIYAWAKI A. Restoration of urban green environments based on the theories of vegetation ecology. Ecological Engineering, 11, 157, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-....
 
7.
MIYAWAKI A. Creative ecology restoration of native forests by native trees. Plant Biotechnology, 16, 15, 1999. https://doi.org/10.5511/plantb....
 
8.
HO K.V., KRÖEL-DULAY G., TÖLGYESI C., BÁTORI Z., TANÁCS E., KERTÉSZ M., TÖRÖK P., ERDŐS L. Non-native tree plantations are weak substitutes for near-natural forests regarding plant diversity and ecological value. Forest Ecology and Management, 531, 120789, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fore....
 
9.
TEOBALDELLI M., CONA F., STINCA A., SAULINO L., ANZANO E., GIORDANO D., MIGLIOZZI A., BONANOMI G., D'URSO G., MAZZOLENI S. Improving resilience of an old-growth urban forest in Southern Italy: Lesson(s) from a stand-replacing windstorm. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 47, 126521, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug....
 
10.
PIRNAT J., HLADNIK D. The concept of landscape structure, forest continuum and connectivity as a support in urban forest management and landscape planning. Forests, 9 (10), 584, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/f91005....
 
11.
SHAO Q. A boom of "nature-approximating forestry" in Middle Europe. World Forestry Research, 4, 8, 1991.
 
12.
TUXEN R. Die heutige potentielle naturliche Vegetation als Gegenstand der Vegetationskartierung. Beriche Zur Deutschen Landeskunde, 19, 200, 1957.
 
13.
SCHIRONE B., SALIS A., VESSELLA F. Effectiveness of the Miyawaki method in Mediterranean forest restoration programs. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 7, 81, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355....
 
14.
WANG R., FUJIWARA K., YOU H. Theory and practices for forest vegetation restoration: Native forest with native trees-introduction of the Miyawaki's method for reconstruction of. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 26, 133, 2002.
 
15.
SANDEEP R., SHARMA P., MODI N. Development of tree plantation through Miyawaki method at Sabarmati Riverfront Development Corporation Limited-a research. International Association of Biologicals and Computational Digest, 1 (1), 163, 2022.
 
16.
GU L., WANG C. Experiences and revelations of urban forest development in Hong Kong and Taiwan. World Forestry Research, 25 (03), 50, 2012 [In Chinese].
 
17.
SIKORSKA D., CIĘŻKOWSKI W., BABAŃCZYK P., CHORMAŃSKI J., SIKORSKI P. Intended wilderness as a nature-based solution: Status, identification and management of urban spontaneous vegetation in cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 62, 127155, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug....
 
18.
QI X.H., CHEN L., HONG W., CHENG Y., CHEN M.J. Researches on nature-approximating landscape architecture. Architectural Journal, 8 (08), 53, 2005 [In Chinese].
 
19.
FOO C.H. Linking forest naturalness and human wellbeing-a study on public's experiential connection to remnant forests within a highly urbanized region in Malaysia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 16, 13, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug....
 
20.
SHEN L.Y., HAN Y.J. Construction of urban forest system in Shanghai with close-to-nature forestry management ideas. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 1, 93, 2007 [In Chinese].
 
21.
HITCHMOUGH J. Exotic plants and plantings in the sustainable, designed urban landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100 (4), 380, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
 
22.
REN B.B., SHANG R., LI F., LI W., WANG J.H., LI G., LIU Q. Close-to-nature plant community construction in urban greenspace of Beijing. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 38 (10), 2911, 2019 [In Chinese].
 
23.
LIU G., LU Y.C., STURM K., NING J.K., LEI X.D. Application of near-nature estimation method for forest management in Beijing. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 37 (05), 114, 2009 [In Chinese].
 
24.
GIMMI U., RADELOFF V.C. Assessing naturalness in Northern Great Lakes forests based on historical land-cover and vegetation changes. Environmental Management, 52, 481, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267... PMid:23771284.
 
25.
HE Z.L., ZHANG Y.X., GUO J.P. Research progress on management technology and effect evaluation of near-natural forestry management in China. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 45 (09), 1566, 1582, 2017 [In Chinese].
 
26.
KORJUS H., KIVISTE A., KANGUR A., PALUOTS T., LAARMANN D., PÕLDVEER E. Dataset on stand structural indices and forest ecosystem naturalness in Hemiboreal forests. Data in Brief, 29, 105387, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.... PMid:32211460 PMCid:PMC7082525.
 
27.
FENG J., WANG J., YAO S., DING L. Dynamic assessment of forest resources quality at the provincial level using AHP and cluster analysis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 124, 184, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
28.
ZHAO Z., HUI G. Forest naturalness evaluation method based on stand state characters: A case study of Gansu Xiaolongshan forests. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 47 (12), 9, 2011.
 
29.
ÖZKAYA G., ERDIN C. Evaluation of the forest quantity, quality, and management through Gray relational analysis method. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, 10, 27 (2), 2022. https://doi.org/10.31195/ejejf....
 
30.
BONČINA A., KLOPČIČ M., SIMONČIČ T., DAKSKOBLER I., FICKO A., ROZMAN A. A general framework to describe the alteration of natural tree species composition as an indicator of forest naturalness. Ecological Indicators, 77, 194, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
31.
OLIVEIRA L.Z., VIBRANS A.C. An approach to illustrate the naturalness of the Brazilian Araucaria forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 50 (1), 32, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2....
 
32.
MCROBERTS R.E., WINTER S., CHIRICI G., LAPOINT E. Assessing forest naturalness. Forest Science, 58 (3), 294, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci....
 
33.
KUNTTU P., JUNNINEN K., KOUKI J. Dead wood as an indicator of forest naturalness: A comparison of methods. Forest Ecology and Management, 353, 30, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fore....
 
34.
HUANG X., TENG M., ZHOU Z., WANG P., DIAN Y., WU C. Linking naturalness and quality improvement of monoculture plantations in urban area: A case study in Wuhan City, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 59, 126911, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug....
 
35.
SCHERRER D., BALTENSWEILER A., BÜRGI M., FISCHER C., STADELMANN G., WOHLGEMUTH T. Low naturalness of Swiss broadleaf forests increases their susceptibility to disturbances. Forest Ecology and Management, 532, 120827, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fore....
 
36.
MERGANIČ J., MERGANIČOVÁ K., MORAVČÍK M., MARUŠÁK R. Objective evaluation of forest naturalness: Case study in Slovak nature reserve. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 21 (5), 2012.
 
37.
JAROSZEWICZ B., CHOLEWIŃSKA O., GUTOWSKI J.M., SAMOJLIK T., ZIMNY M., LATAŁOWA M. Białowieża Forest - a relic of the high naturalness of European forests. Forests, 10 (10), 849, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10100....
 
38.
ANHUI PROVINCIAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS. Anhui Statistical Yearbook, 2022 ed., China Statistical Publishing House: Beijing, China, pp. 283, 2022 [In Chinese].
 
39.
YAO X.M., CHEN Y.Y., OU C., ZHANG Q.Y., YAO X.J. Spatio-temporal evolution and ecological benefits of urban green space: Takes Hefei Municipal Area as an example. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 32 (01), 51, 2023 [In Chinese].
 
40.
YAN P., YANG J. Species diversity of urban forests in China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 28 (02), 160, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug....
 
41.
WANG J.N., ZHAO D.X., LIU H., LV Z.K., WANG H.X. Selection of tree species in an urban green space by local participants. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 34 (06), 1120, 2017 [In Chinese].
 
42.
MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND URBAN-RURAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. Urban green space classification standard, CJJ/T 85-2017, China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2018 [In Chinese].
 
43.
WANG J.N., WANG H. An analysis of the new standard for classification of urban green space. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 35 (04), 92, 2019 [In Chinese].
 
44.
LIU H., ZHU J., WANG J.N., WANG Z.C., CAO X.J. Dynamic change of plant community structure in the Ring Park around Hefei City. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 26 (08), 1284, 2017 [In Chinese].
 
45.
STANDOVÁR T., SZMORAD F., KOVÁCS B., KELEMEN K., PLATTNER M., ROTH T., PATAKI Z. A novel forest state assessment methodology to support conservation and forest management planning. Community Ecology, 17 (2), 167, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1556/168.20....
 
46.
CÔTÉ S., BÉLANGER L., BEAUREGARD R., THIFFAULT É., MARGNI M. A conceptual model for forest naturalness assessment and application in Quebec's boreal forest. Forests, 10 (4), 325, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10040....
 
47.
YAO X.J. Study on native tree species in Hefei. Master, Anhui Agriculture University, Hefei, 2008 [In Chinese].
 
48.
FAKHAR IZADI N., KESHTKAR H. Investigating the effects of distribution patterns on ecological indices of plant species in a simulated environment. Desert, 25 (2), 201, 2020.
 
49.
XU M.S., ZHENG L.T., YE S.F., LIU X.Y., YAN E.R. Evaluation of vegetation naturalness across 10 islands in Eastern China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41 (09), 3713, 2021 [In Chinese]. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb20....
 
50.
ZHOU Z.X. Garden ecology experimental practice guide book, 1st ed., China Agricultural Publishing House: Beijing, China, pp. 76, 2003 [In Chinese].
 
51.
CUI H.S., JIANG Y., LIN M.Z., JIANG T., JI S.T. Forest naturalness evaluation in Baiyun Mountain of Guangzhou. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 10 (01), 18, 2015 [In Chinese].
 
52.
GREENACRE M., GROENEN P.J., HASTIE T., D'ENZA A.I., MARKOS A., TUZHILINA E. Principal component analysis. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2 (1), 100, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586....
 
53.
RICCIOLI F., FRATINI R., MARONE E., FAGARAZZI C., CALDERISI M., BRUNIALTI G. Indicators of sustainable forest management to evaluate the socioeconomic functions of coppice in Tuscany, Italy. Socioeconomic Planning Sciences, 70, 100732, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps....
 
54.
BUZZARD V., MICHALETZ S.T., DENG Y., HE Z., NING D., SHEN L., TU Q., VAN NOSTRAND J.D., VOORDECKERS J.W., WANG J. Continental scale structuring of forest and soil diversity via functional traits. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3 (9), 1298, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559... PMid:31427732.
 
55.
WU R.M., ZHANG Z., YAN W., FAN J., GOU J., LIU B., GIDE E., SOAR J., SHEN B., FAZAL-E-HASAN S. A comparative analysis of the principal component analysis and entropy weight methods to establish the indexing measurement. Plos One, 17 (1), e0262261, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa... PMid:35085274 PMCid:PMC8802816.
 
56.
LUO H., ZHAO Q., ZHANG L., GAO C., WU X., NIE Y. Landscape health assessment of suburban forest park: A case study based on multiple sampling units and functional characteristics. Forests, 14 (11), 2237, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14112....
 
57.
LIUBACHYNA A., BUBBICO A., SECCO L., PETTENELLA D. Management goals and performance: Clustering state forest management organizations in Europe with multivariate statistics. Forests, 8 (12), 504, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/f81205....
 
58.
JEVŠENAK J., SKUDNIK M. A Random Forest model for basal area increment predictions from national forest inventory data. Forest Ecology and Management, 479, 118601, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fore....
 
59.
XU Z., SHEN D., NIE T., KOU Y. A hybrid sampling algorithm combining M-smote and ENN based on random forest for medical imbalanced data. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 107, 103465, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.... PMid:32512209.
 
60.
NIU L., GUO Y., LI Y., WANG C., HU Q., FAN L., WANG L., YANG N. Degradation of river ecological quality in Tibet Plateau with overgrazing: A quantitative assessment using biotic integrity index improved by Random Forest. Ecological Indicators, 120, 106948, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
61.
GEORGANOS S., GRIPPA T., NIANG GADIAGA A., LINARD C., LENNERT M., VANHUYSSE S., MBOGA N., WOLFF E., KALOGIROU S. Geographical Random Forests: A spatial extension of the random forest algorithm to address spatial heterogeneity in remote sensing and population modelling. Geocarto International, 36 (2), 121, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/101060....
 
62.
WANG F., WANG Y., ZHANG K., HU M., WENG Q., ZHANG H. Spatial heterogeneity modeling of water quality based on Random Forest regression and model interpretation. Environmental Research, 202, 111660, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envr... PMid:34265353.
 
63.
CHEN S., YAO S. Evaluation of forestry ecological efficiency: A spatiotemporal empirical study based on China's provinces. Forests, 12 (2), 142, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020....
 
64.
PHAM B.T., PRADHAN B., BUI D.T., PRAKASH I., DHOLAKIA M. A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: A case study of Uttarakhand area (India). Environmental Modelling & Software, 84, 240, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envs....
 
65.
COLAK A., ROTHERHAM I., CALIKOGLU M. Combining 'naturalness concepts' with close-to-nature silviculture. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt, 122 (6), 421, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342....
 
66.
WANG Q.L., WANG W.Y., LIN S., CAO Z., CHEN Q., HE K.N. Stand structure adjustment based on the near-natural management of plantation ecological public forests in Eastern Qinghai. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41 (12), 5004, 2021 [In Chinese]. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb20....
 
67.
HANNA E., BRUNO D., COMÍN F.A. Evaluating naturalness and functioning of urban green infrastructure. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 80, 127825, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug....
 
68.
HORVÁTH M., BEČVÁROVÁ P.H., ŠARAPATKA B., VENCÁLEK O., ZOUHAR V. Potential relationships of selected abiotic variables, chemical elements and stand characteristics with soil organic carbon in spruce and beech stands. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 14 (4), 320, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor36....
 
69.
KORHONEN A., SIITONEN J., KOTZE D.J., IMMONEN A., HAMBERG L. Stand characteristics and dead wood in urban forests: Potential biodiversity hotspots in managed boreal landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 201, 103855, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
 
70.
BASKENT E.Z. A framework for characterizing and regulating ecosystem services in a management planning context. Forests, 11 (1), 102, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010....
 
71.
STRONG W. Biased richness and evenness relationships within Shannon-Wiener index values. Ecological Indicators, 67, 703, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
72.
SIMMONDS J.S., SUAREZ‐CASTRO A.F., RESIDE A.E., WATSON J.E., ALLAN J.R., ATKINSON S.C., BORRELLI P., DUDLEY N., EDWARDS S., FULLER R.A. Retaining natural vegetation to safeguard biodiversity and humanity. Conservation Biology, 37 (3), e14040, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.1... PMid:36424859.
 
73.
FORERO L.E., KULMATISKI A., GRENZER J., NORTON J.M. Plant-soil feedbacks help explain biodiversity-productivity relationships. Communications Biology, 4 (1), 789, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003... PMid:34172839 PMCid:PMC8233354.
 
74.
ANDERSON E.C., MINOR E.S. Assessing four methods for establishing native plants on urban vacant land. Ambio, 50 (3), 695, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280... PMid:32948986 PMCid:PMC7882654.
 
75.
BERTHON K., THOMAS F., BEKESSY S. The role of 'nativeness' in urban greening to support animal biodiversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 205, 103959, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
 
76.
JOHNSON T., CAMERON D., MOORE G., BRIEN C. Ground movement in a moderately expansive soil subject to rainfall infiltration through pervious paving. Ecological Engineering, 158, 106022, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
77.
LIU Y., MIAO H., CHANG X., WU G. Higher species diversity improves soil water infiltration capacity by increasing soil organic matter content in semiarid grasslands. Land Degradation & Development, 30 (13), 1599, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.33....
 
78.
LIU X.Z., MA S., LU Y.C. Research of forest naturalness assessment. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 35 (04), 99, 2015 [In Chinese].
 
79.
BORGHI C., FRANCINI S., MCROBERTS R.E., PARISI F., LOMBARDI F., NOCENTINI S., MALTONI A., TRAVAGLINI D., CHIRICI G. Country-wide assessment of biodiversity, naturalness, and old-growth status using national forest inventory data. European Journal of Forest Research, 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342....
 
80.
DI FILIPPO A., BIONDI F., PIOVESAN G., ZIACO E. Tree ring‐based metrics for assessing old‐growth forest naturalness. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54 (3), 737, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2....
 
81.
LIANG X., YANG T., NIU J., ZHANG L., WANG D., HUANG J., YANG Z., BERNDTSSON R. Quality assessment and rehabilitation of mountain forest in the Chongli Winter Olympic Games area, China. Forests, 13 (5), 783, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13050....
 
82.
FICKO A., LIDESTAV G., DHUBHÁIN Á.N., KARPPINEN H., ZIVOJINOVIC I., WESTIN K. European private forest owner typologies: A review of methods and use. Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 21, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forp....
 
83.
BOATENG E.Y., OTOO J., ABAYE D.A. Basic tenets of classification algorithms K-nearest-neighbor, support vector machine, random forest, and neural network: A review. Journal of Data Analysis and Information Processing, 8 (4), 341, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4236/jdaip.....
 
84.
GONG Y., LI X., LV L., ZHANG B., XUAN J., DU H. Using UAV lidar intensity frequency and hyperspectral features to improve the accuracy of urban tree species classification. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 17, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS....
 
85.
GENUER R., POGGI J., TULEAU-MALOT C. Variable selection using Random Forests. Pattern Recognition Letters, 31 (14), 2225, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patr....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top