ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Central Environmental Supervision System and Green M&A of Heavy Polluting Enterprises
,
 
Kun Ya 2
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Economics and Management, Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin, China
 
2
School of Accounting, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, China
 
3
School of Basic, Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin, China
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2024-12-31
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-03-24
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-03-31
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-05-09
 
 
Corresponding author
Liyun Chen   

School of Economics and Management, Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin, China
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Green transformation is essential for the high-quality development of heavy polluting enterprises and the realization of China’s modernization. Green mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are an important strategy for achieving this goal. This study employs the central environmental protection supervision policy as a quasi-natural experiment and constructs a multi-time point difference-in-differences model using data from A-share listed heavy polluting enterprises from 2010 to 2023. The empirical results show that the central environmental protection supervision system has a positive impact on the Green M&A behavior of heavy polluting enterprises. From a mechanistic perspective, the central environmental supervision system primarily promotes Green M&A through two pathways: enhancing internal environmental performance and increasing external legitimacy requirements. Further analysis reveals that the promotion effect is more pronounced in central and western regions and in enterprises more prone to “government-enterprise collusion”. This study elucidates the relationship between the central environmental protection supervision system and the Green M&A of heavy polluting enterprises, contributing to a deeper understanding of corporate green transformation and the micro-impact of environmental supervision systems, and leverage Green M&A to achieve a ‘win-win’ in environmental and economic benefits.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (33)
1.
ALAN M., ALAIN V. Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: an organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal. 19 (4), 363, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)...<363::AID-SMJ974>3.0.CO;2-H.
 
2.
HUANG D.Y. Green System Innovation: Central Environmental Protection Inspector and Corporate ESG Performance-Effect Assessment, Mechanism Analysis and Empowerment Paths Supported by Marketization Conditions. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics. 46 (3), 1, 2024.
 
3.
CHEN D., ZHANG M., WANG Y. Central inspection of ecological and environmental protection and the improvement of local air quality: Evidence from using multi-phase difference-in-difference method. Science & Technology Review. 40 (4), 55, 2022.
 
4.
ZHOU Y., FENG H.Y., CHEN X.L. The Deterrent Effect of Central Environmental Supervision and the Improvement of China's Environmental Governance Mechanism. Economic Perspectives. 8, 33, 2021.
 
5.
HUANG R.B., CHU F. Central Environmental Protection Inspectors, Performance Appraisal Pressure and Corporate 'Greenwashing'. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition). 23 (1), 70, 2023.
 
6.
ZHANG M., SUN X.R., SONG Y. Central Environmental Protection Supervision and Air Pollution Control - Evolutionary Game Analysis Based on Vertical Government and Polluting Enterprises. Chinese Journal of Management Science. 31 (4), 171, 2023.
 
7.
ZENG M., ZHENG L., HUANG Z. Does vertical supervision promote regional green transformation? Evidence from Central Environmental Protection Inspection. Journal of Environmental Management. 326, 116681, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
 
8.
GONG Y.L., ZHAO L.K., MA Y.Q. Industry Policy and Corporate M&A Decisions-Based on the Policy-Oriented Perspective. Industrial Economic Review. 14 (3), 70, 2023.
 
9.
HUANG W.N., YUAN T.R. Green Mergers and Acquisitions Promote Enterprise Green Innovation: The Mediating Role of Stakeholder Support. Science and Technology Management Research. 42 (7), 235, 2022.
 
10.
HAN Z.J., WANG Y.W., PANG J. Does Environmental Regulation Promote Green Merger and Acquisition? Evidence from the Implementation of China's Newly Revised Environmental Protection Law. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 10, 21, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.....
 
11.
LI B., XU L., MCIVER R. Green M&A, legitimacy and risk-taking: evidence from China's heavy polluters. Accounting & Finance. 60 (1), 97, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.1....
 
12.
PORTER M.E., VAN DER LINDE C. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 9 (4), 97, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.....
 
13.
YU B., JIN G., CHENG Z.H. Economic Effects of Environmental Regulations "Emission Reduction" or "Efficiency Enhancement". Statistical Research. 36 (2), 88, 2019.
 
14.
YANG J. Financing Constraints, Informal Environmental Regulation and Green M&A. Communication of Finance and Accounting. 4, 60, 2020.
 
15.
DIEZ-MARTIN F., BLANCO GONZALES A., DIEZ E. Measuring a scientifically multifaceted concept. The jungle of organizational legitimacy. European Research on Management and Business Economics. 27 (1), 100131, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iede....
 
16.
QIU J.L., PAN A.L., ZHANG G.Z. Formal Environmental Regulation, Informal Environmental Regulation and the Heavy-Polluting Enterprises Green M&A Decisions. Social Sciences in Guangdong. 2, 51, 2018.
 
17.
CHEN Q., LI M.H. Does Vertical Environmental Supervision Improve Corporate ESG Performance? - Evidence from the Central Environmental Protection Inspection. Public Administration and Policy Review. 12 (6), 45, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4....
 
18.
YU L.C., ZHANG W.G., BI Q. Can Environmental Taxes Force Corporate Green Innovation? Journal of Audit & Economics. 34 (2), 79, 2019.
 
19.
SONG P., CHEN M.Y., MAO X.Q. Does Central Environmental Protection Inspection Promote Green Innovation of Heavy Pollution Companies? Evidence from Green Patent Data of Chinese Listed Companies. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management. 14 (3), 73, 2022.
 
20.
LUO W. Research on the Impact of Central Environmental Protection Inspectors on Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure. Communication of Finance and Accounting. 1, 61, 2024.
 
21.
PAN A.L., LIU X., QIU J.L., SHEN Y. Can Green M&A under the Pressure of Media Promote the Substantive Transformation of Heavy Polluting Enterprises. China Industrial Economics. 2, 174, 2019.
 
22.
SHEN H.T., ZHOU Y.K. Supervision of Environmental Policy Enforcement and Firm Environmental Performance: Evidence from a Quasi-natural Experiment. Nan Kai Business Review. 20 (6), 73, 2017.
 
23.
BECK T., LEVINE R., LEVKOV A. Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States. The Journal of Finance. 65 (5), 1637, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540....
 
24.
CHETTY R., LOONEY A., KROFT K. Replication data for: Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence. The American Economic Review. 99 (4), 1145, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99....
 
25.
WANG H., YANG G., OUYANG X., QIN J. Does central environmental inspection improves enterprise total factor productivity? The mediating effect of management efficiency and technological innovation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28 (17), 21950, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
 
26.
WANG H.F., HAN G., LI X.Y. Environmental Protection Tax and Green M&A of Heavy Polluting Enterprises -- An Empirical Analysis Based on Double Transformation Model. Journal of Financial Development Research. 11, 22, 2023.
 
27.
LIU J.K., XIAO Y.Y. China's Environmental Protection Tax and Green Innovation: Incentive Effect or Crowding-out Effect? Economic Research Journal. 57 (1), 72, 2022.
 
28.
WEN Z.L., YE B.J. Analyses of Mediating Effects: The Development of Methods and Models. Advances in Psychological Science. 22 (5), 731, 2014. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1....
 
29.
LIN X., FENG L., XIN L. Legitimized Identity vs Identifiable Legitimacy: Toward a Theoretical Framework of the Relationship Between Organizational Identity and Organizational Legitimacy. Nan Kai Business Review International. 11 (1), 102, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-0....
 
30.
WANG W.J., ZHU H.B., ZHANG B. Capital Market Liberalization and Quality of Environment Information Disclosure. Journal of Management Science. 34 (6), 29, 2021.
 
31.
LI P.S., CHEN Y.Y. Environmental Regulation, Enterprise Bargaining Power and Green Total Factor Productivity. Finance & Trade Economics. 40 (11), 144, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1118....
 
32.
YANG L.Y., ZHANG Z.Y., ZHENG J.M. Does Central Government Environmental Inspection Promote Firm Environmental Protection Expenditure? Evidences from Listed Companies in China. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences). 51 (3), 95, 2021.
 
33.
XU N.X., JIANG X.Y., YI Z.H., YUAN Q.B. Do Political Connections Affect the Efficiency of Legal Enforcement? China Economic Quarterly. 12 (2), 373, 2013.
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top