ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Efficiency Evaluation of Green Innovation
in Chinese Eight Comprehensive Economic Areas
Based on Three-stage Malmquist Index
More details
Hide details
1
School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, No. 99, Shangda Road, China
Submission date: 2020-07-27
Final revision date: 2020-10-20
Acceptance date: 2020-11-03
Online publication date: 2021-02-24
Publication date: 2021-04-16
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2021;30(3):2863-2875
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Based on the regional panel data of 2011-2018, this investigation firstly employs three-stage
Malmquist index to evaluate the green innovation efficiency of Eight Comprehensive Economic Areas
in China. Then, according to the different causes of low technology efficiency in different areas, Eight
Comprehensive Economic Areas are classified into four categories utilizing pure technology efficiency
and scale efficiency matrix. Additionally, the comparison between original and revised Malmquist
index is illustrated. The empirical findings are as follows: (1) The green innovation efficiency in
the whole country is on the rise. South coast, Northwest and Southwest are ahead of the country.
(2) Accelerating the development of technology market and optimizing the industrial structure
contribute to the advancement of green innovation efficiency. (3) The green innovation efficiency in the
first stage is overestimated due to the overestimated technical efficiency. Furthermore, the fundamental
reason for low technical efficiency is low scale efficiency. (4) After excluding the interference of
external environment and random factors, the Malmquist index of each region declines. Additionally,
the national average value of green innovation efficiency descends from 1.105 to 1.047, and Northwest
and Middle Yellow River decreases 5 ranks and increases 3 ranks, respectively.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
CITATIONS (8):
1.
Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Driving Mechanism of Green Innovation in China
Weisong Mi, Kaixu Zhao, Pei Zhang
Sustainability
2.
Efficiency of Technological Innovation in China from a Digital Perspective—Based on Three-Stage DEA Model
静 安
E-Commerce Letters
3.
Fiscal decentralization, local government environmental protection preference, and regional green innovation efficiency: evidence from China
Mingjin Wang, Hongxiang Zhang, Dingyu Dang, Jing Guan, Yujie He, Yiting Chen
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
4.
Innovation input-output and output-lagged input relationships of the next-generation information industry in China
Si Chen, Weilun Huang
Information Processing & Management
5.
Innovation Efficiency of Chinese Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry from the Perspective of Innovation Ecosystem
Xueling Guan, Lijiang Chen, Qing Xia, Zhaohui Qin
Sustainability
6.
Research on green innovation efficiency measurement and influencing factors in the three major coastal urban agglomerations in China
Shuli Ying, Qiquan Fang, Yanting Ji
Frontiers in Environmental Science
7.
Evaluating Green Technology Innovation Capability in Intelligent Manufacturing Enterprises: A $Z$-Number-Based Model
Yi Su, Jiahui Chai, Sichong Lu, Zhouzhou Lin
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
8.
A study on the technological innovation efficiency of China’s high-tech industries based on three-stage DEA and Malmquist index
Chen Wei, Li Yuan
Operational Research