ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Evaluation and Obstacle Factors of the Green Development Level of China‘s Oil and Gas Resource-Based Cities Based on DPSIR-TOPSIS Model
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Economics and Management, Southwest Petroleum University, No. 8 Xindu Avenue, Xindu Street, Xindu District, Chengdu, 610500, China
 
 
Submission date: 2024-02-19
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-03-13
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-04-13
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-06-06
 
 
Publication date: 2025-01-09
 
 
Corresponding author
Yulan Zhou   

Department of Economics and Management, Southwest Petroleum University, No. 8 Xindu Avenue, Xindu Street, Xindu District, Chengdu, 610500, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(2):1481-1493
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The green development of oil and gas resource-based cities is not only a necessary choice to address resource depletion, protect the ecological environment, promote economic transformation, and improve residents’ quality of life but also a crucial approach to ensuring long-term, stable, and sustainable urban economic development. This paper constructs an evaluation index system for the green development of oil-and-gas resource-based cities based on the DPSIR model. The system includes five sub-systems: driving forces, pressures, status, impacts, and responses. By utilizing the entropy weight TOPSIS model and obstacle degree model, this study evaluates and analyzes the level of green development as well as obstacle factors in 17 oil-and-gas resource-based prefecture-level cities in China from 2011 to 2021. The findings indicate that: (1) Overall, the green development level of oil and gas resource-based cities is relatively low, with significant regional disparities. (2) Both the driving force system and pressure system generally exhibit a declining trend in terms of green development level, while the state system shows improvement over time; meanwhile, both the influence system and response system demonstrate fluctuations. (3) Major obstacles faced by oil-and-gas resource-based cities include per capita green space availability, accessibility of public transport vehicles per 10k people, coverage area per capita for urban roads, R&D expenditure proportion in GDP, as well as social security subsidies proportion in general public budget expenditure. Based on these evaluation results and analysis outcomes, it is recommended that city governments optimize their policy systems, prioritize training programs for attracting talents specializing in green industries, and enhance efficiency regarding urban green development.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (38)
1.
TENG X.Y., ZHUANG W\.W., LIU F.P., CHANG T.H., CHIU Y.H. China's path of carbon neutralization to develop green energy and improve energy efficiency. *Renewable Energy*, 206, 397, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene...>.
 
2.
WANG Y.J., CHEN H., LONG R.Y., SUN Q.Q., JIANG S.Y., LIU B. Has the Sustainable Development Planning Policy Promoted the Green Transformation in China's Resource‑based Cities? *Resources Conservation and Recycling*, 180, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resc...>.
 
3.
ZHU B.Z., ZHANG M.F., ZHOU Y.H., WANG P., SHENG J.C., HE K.J., WEI Y.M., XIE R. Exploring the effect of industrial structure adjustment on interprovincial green development efficiency in China. *Energy Policy*, 134, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo...>.
 
4.
LIU X.Q., WANG X., LU F.Y., LIU S., CHEN K.L. Evaluation of the Governance Efficiency of Water Environmental Governance in the Yangtze River Delta from the Perspective of Multivariate Synergies. *International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health*, 19 (4), 2022. <https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph...> PMid:35206535 PMCid:PMC8872379.
 
5.
CHEN L.F., WANG K.F. Spatial spillover effect of low‑carbon city pilot scheme on green efficiency in China's cities: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. *Energy Economics*, 110, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec...>.
 
6.
WEI X., CHUANKUAI P. Evaluation of coupling coordination level and analysis of obstacle factors for county high‑quality development: Hubei Province case study. *Statistics and Decision*, 39 (22), 123, 2023.
 
7.
HAN M., JING Z. Evaluation and influencing factors of agricultural green development: Hebei Province case study. *Agricultural Prospect*, 16 (10), 20, 2020.
 
8.
XINMEI Y., HEPING H., RUIHUI Z. Evaluation and spatial‑temporal evolution of urban green development in China. *Acta Ecologica Sinica*, 43 (04), 1353, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb20...>.
 
9.
HUI M., CHUANBIN Y., ZHIMENG L. Multidimensional dynamic evaluation of green development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. *Statistics and Decision*, 39 (09), 68, 2023.
 
10.
CHENG S., PEIYANG Z., BO X. Measurement and spatial differentiation of green development in Jiangxi Province. *Economic Geography*, 41 (06), 180, 2021.
 
11.
SHANSHAN L., WENJIE W., ZHIQIANG W. Green development level measurement and influencing factors in Urumqi based on DPSIR‑TOPSIS. *Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment*, 45 (04), 857, 2023.
 
12.
YINGBO F. Evaluation of China’s green development level and spatio‑temporal evolution characteristics. *Statistics and Decision*, 38 (20), 54, 2022.
 
13.
FEI S., CHONGLIANG S., YOUJUN L. Industrial green development of oil & gas resource‑based cities in China based on Entropy Weight‑TOPSIS. *Polish Journal of Environmental Studies*, 32 (4), 3545, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes...> PMid:20531584.
 
14.
LONG R.Y., LI H.F., WU M.F., LI W\.B. Dynamic evaluation of green development level in China’s coal resource‑based cities using TOPSIS. *Resources Policy*, 74, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso...>.
 
15.
JIAMIN R., FUYOU G., HONGBO Z., ROUYU Z.C., YU C. Spatial‑temporal heterogeneity of industrial green transformation in resource‑based cities in the Yellow River Basin. *China Population, Resources and Environment*, 33 (6), 151, 2023.
 
16.
JUNWEI X., ZHIHUA L. Spatial effect of urban green development in the Beijing‑Tianjin‑Hebei region: A spatial Durbin model study. *Ecological Economy*, 38 (08), 80, 2022.
 
17.
WANG K.L., ZHANG F.Q., XU R.Y., MIAO Z., CHENG Y.H., SUN H.P. Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of green innovation efficiency: A China city‑level analysis. *Ecological Indicators*, 146, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol...>.
 
18.
CHENYU L., WEI C., PING H., XIAOWAN L., XIANGLONG T. Spatiotemporal comprehensive measurement of China's industrial green development level and analysis of influencing factors. *Ecological Economy*, 38 (3), 54, 2022.
 
19.
LEI X., YANG Y., DANZHIGANG. Provincial green development performance evaluation based on DPSIR model. *Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology*, 12 (05), 1681, 2022.
 
20.
QIAN Z., YINGZHEN L. How does education affect the efficiency of urban green development in the context of "Internet Plus"? Empirical analysis based on 264 prefecture-level cities. *Education and Economy*, 37 (4), 9, 2021.
 
21.
KAIJUN C., SHUNFA L. Spatial and temporal differentiation and spatial spillover effect analysis of green development efficiency of urban tourism in China. *Resources and Environment in the Yangtze River Basin*, 33 (01), 1, 2024.
 
22.
HAORAN L. Efficiency measurement and influencing factors of green economy in the Beijing‑Tianjin‑Hebei Region: Super‑SBM and Tobit model analysis. *Ecological Economy*, 39 (04), 67, 2023.
 
23.
GUANGHUI T., JIANGSU L., CHANGHONG M., PINGPING D. Urban green development efficiency and influencing factors based on non‑expected outputs in China. *Economic Geography*, 42 (6), 9, 2022.
 
24.
WEN T., QI S.A., QIAN Y. Index measurement and spatial‑temporal evolution of China's new economy based on the DPSIR model. *International Review of Economics & Finance*, 90, 252, 2024. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref...>.
 
25.
YANG S., PAN Y., ZENG S.Z. Decision‑making framework based on Fermatean fuzzy integrated weighted distance and TOPSIS for green low‑carbon port evaluation. *Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence*, 114, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enga...>.
 
26.
QUANCHENG D., JIANHUA P., XUEMEI M., PENG L., CHANGTING M. Evaluation of water resources carrying capacity in Xinxiang City based on combined weight TOPSIS model. *Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering*, 33 (5), 81, 2022.
 
27.
SONG K.Y., BIAN Y.C., ZHU C., NAN Y.Q. Impacts of dual decentralization on green total factor productivity: Evidence from China’s economic transition. *Environmental Science and Pollution Research*, 27 (12), 14070, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356...> PMid:32040739.
 
28.
LI Q.Y., ZENG F.E., LIU S.H., YANG M.A., XU F. The effects of China’s sustainable development policy for resource‑based cities on local industrial transformation. *Resources Policy*, 71, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso...>.
 
29.
QIYING R., JINNING Z., XIAODONG Y. Does the opening of high‑speed rail improve the efficiency of urban green development? A DID‑based analysis. *Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics*, (5), 11, 2020.
 
30.
LIU Y.B., LU F., XIAN C.F., OUYANG Z.Y. Urban development and resource endowments shape natural resource utilization efficiency in Chinese cities. *Journal of Environmental Sciences*, 126, 806, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes....> PMid:36503805.
 
31.
HONGJUAN C., WENZHAO F., XINXING J. Spatial and temporal pattern evolution of urban green development level and efficiency in Beijing‑Tianjin‑Hebei. *Ecological Economy*, 37 (04), 96, 2021.
 
32.
SUEYOSHI T., RYU Y. Performance assessment of the semiconductor industry measured by DEA environmental assessment. *Energies*, 13 (22), 2020. <https://doi.org/10.3390/en1322...>.
 
33.
WENJUN C., FENGQIAO M. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of industrial green transformation efficiency in resource‑based cities. *Ecological Economy*, (11), 78, 2022.
 
34.
YU W\.H., PENG Y.W., YAO X. Effects of China’s supporting policy for resource‑exhausted cities on local energy efficiency: An empirical study based on 284 cities. *Energy Economics*, 112, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec...>.
 
35.
ZEYI Z., YUQIN Z., JIATING D. Efficiency evaluation and influencing factors of green urbanization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: A multidimensional perspective. *Chinese Journal of Environmental Management*, 15 (4), 121, 2023.
 
36.
YATING Z. Measurement, spatial‑temporal differentiation and influencing factors of green technology innovation efficiency in China. *Modern Industrial Economy and Informationization*, 13 (6), 184, 2023.
 
37.
ZEWEI Y. A Belt and Road approach to the China‑Central Asia energy partnership in the context of high‑quality development. *Journal of Political Science and Law*, (4), 15, 2023.
 
38.
ZHANG H., CHEN H., WU M., JIN W., MAO G., LONG R. Dynamic evaluation and internal driving factors of water resources green efficiency in China. *Water*, 12 (9), 2020. <https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092...>.
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top