ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Evaluation of the Carbon Stock and Cork Harvesting Practices of a Quercus Suber Stand in Tunisia
 
More details
Hide details
1
National Institute for Research in Rural Engineering, Water and Forestry (INRGREF), University of Carthage, Hédi Karray, 2080, Ariana, Tunisia.
 
 
Submission date: 2026-01-08
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-04-17
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-05-25
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-09-03
 
 
Corresponding author
Sghaier Tahar   

Ecology Laboratory, National Institute for Research in Rural Engineering, Water and Forestry (INRGREF), University of Carthage, Hédi Karray, 2080, Ariana, Tunisia
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This study aims to evaluate the carbon sequestration potential and cork harvesting practices in a cork oak (Quercus suber) stand in Tunisia, where this species accounts for approximately 6% of the country’s total forested area. Based on dendrometric data collected through field sampling and biomass prediction equations specifically developed for cork oak in Tunisia, the studied plot is characterized by an average density of 287 stems/ha and a basal area of approximately 30 m²/ha, and stores an estimated average of 69 t/ha of carbon. This stock is partitioned between aboveground biomass (51.6±7.7 t/ha) and belowground biomass (root biomass) (17.6±2 t/ha). The wood and cork of the main stem account for the majority of aboveground carbon (43% and 39%, respectively), while branches and foliage contribute 28%. These results highlight the crucial role of cork oak forests as carbon sinks. Analysis of debarking practices reveals significant variability in the coefficients applied (0.48 to 3.82 × CBH; CBH: Circumference at Breast Height), whereas recommended values are expected to range between 1.5 and 2.5. This heterogeneity leads to the overexploitation of small trees and the underexploitation of large ones, resulting in both economic losses and tree weakening. The estimated cork yield over an 11-year cycle shows that applying optimal coefficients could bring cork production closer to the theoretical potential of 345 tons for the plot, corresponding to a coefficient of 2.5 × CBH. Furthermore, nearly 9% of exploitable trees still retain their male cork, representing an additional loss of potential revenue. These results highlight the need to optimize and harmonize debarking practices, adapt interventions to the actual size of the trees, and strengthen silvicultural monitoring to ensure sustainable, profitable, and ecologically efficient management of cork oak forests in Tunisia.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
SGHAIER T., GARCHI S., AZIZI T. Modélisation de la croissance et de la production du liège en Tunisie. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques, 346, 3, 2020 [In French].
 
2.
BOUCHAFRA A., FRAVAL A. Présentation du chêne liège et de la subéraies. In Viellemant C. et Fraval A. La faune du chêne-liège. Actes éditions, Rabat, 1-26, 1991 [In French].
 
3.
NATIVIDADE V.J. Subériculture. Ecole National des Eaux et des Forêts. Nancy, 281p, 1956 [In French].
 
4.
BONNET S. Le chêne-liège, un arbre généreux. The Forest Time, 2019.
 
5.
BENDANOUN M. La Mamora, un patrimoine national vital pour l'avenir de Salé et de la région. Journée d'étude «Sauvons la Mamora », Salé, 25 Mars 1996, ENFI-MEABR (Maroc), 31, 1996 [In French].
 
6.
DGF. Deuxième Inventaire National Forestier et Pastoral: Résultats de l'Inventaire Forestier sur l'échelon de Jendouba (Gouvernorats de Jendouba, Béja et Bizerte). Direction Générale des Forêts (Tunisie), 129 p. 2005 [In French].
 
7.
IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . Pörtner H.-O., Roberts D.C., Tignor M. , Poloczanska E.S., Mintenbeck K., A. Alegría A., M. Craig M., S. Langsdorf S., Löschke S. , Möller V. , Okem A., RamaB. Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA , 2022.
 
8.
KEENAN T.F., WILLIAMS C.A. The Terrestrial Carbon Sink. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 219, 2018.
 
9.
JORGE C., TOMÉ M., RUIZ-PEINADO R., ZRIBI L., PAULO J.A. Quercus suber Allometry in the West Mediterranean Basin. Forests, 14(3), 649, 2023.
 
10.
SANTOS F.D., FERREIRA P.L., PEDERSEN J.S.T. The Climate Change Challenge: A Review of the Barriers and Solutions to Deliver a Paris Solution. Climate, 10(5), 75, 2022.
 
11.
ANDERSEN S.P., ALLEN B., DOMINGO G.C. Biomass in the EU Green Deal: Towards Consensus on the Use of Biomass for EU Bioenergy' Policy Report. Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Brussels, Belgium, 2021.
 
12.
BROWN S. Measuring Carbon in Forests: Current Status and Future Challenges. Environmental Pollution, 116(3), 363, 2022.
 
13.
SEBEI H., ALBOUCHI A., RAPP M., El AOUNI M.H. Évaluation de la biomasse arborée et arbustive dans une séquence de dégradation de la suberaie à Cytise de Kroumirie (Tunisie). Annals of Forest Sciences, 58(2), 175, 2001.
 
14.
EL MOKNI R., MAHMOUDI M.R., SEBEI H., EL AOUNI M.H. Évaluation de la biomasse épigée des peuplements naturels de chêne zéen (Quercus canariensis Willd.) dans les forêts de Kroumirie (Nord-Ouest de la Tunisie). Integrated Protection in Oak Forests IOBC/wprs Bulletin, 76, 47, 2012 [In French].
 
15.
ZRIBI L., CHAAR H., KHALDI A., HANCHI B., MOUILLOT F., GHARBI F. Estimate of biomass and carbon pools in disturbed and undisturbed oak forests in Tunisia. Forest Systems, 25 (2), e060, 2016.
 
16.
RADHOUAN N,, REJEB H. Essai méthodologique pour le maintien et la valorisation d'une ressource naturelle sise en Kroumirie. Conference: Alternatives éco paysagères dans les régions méditerranéennes at UR "HPE" ISA-IRESA- Univ Sousse, 2015 [In French].
 
17.
HAMDI M., LEMPERIERE G., PETIT-BERGHEM Y. Les montagnes de Kroumirie (Tunisie): entre patrimoine naturel et patrimoine paysager. Actes du 135e Congrès National des Sociétés Historiques et Scientifiques, «Paysages», Neuchâtel, 231, 2014 [In French].
 
18.
MATA F., DOS-SANTOS M. Modeling Cork Yield, Thickness, Price, and Gross Income in the Portuguese Cork Oak Montado. Forests, 15(12), 2163, 2024.
 
19.
DGF. Aménagement intégré et participatif de la VIIIème série forestière d'Ain Draham (1968,7 ha). Rapport de la deuxième phase de planification. PV d'aménagement (version définitive). Période de la validité du PV d'aménagement 2019/2042. Publication Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Ressources Hydrauliques et de la Pêche, Tunisie, 32 p, 2019 [In French].
 
20.
SANAA F., IMANE S., MOHAMED B., KENZA A.E.K., SOUHAIL K., LFALAH H., KHADIJA M. Biomass and Carbon Stock Quantification in Cork Oak Forest of Maamora Using a New Approach Based on the Combination of Aerial Laser Scanning Carried by Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data. Forests, 13(8), 1211, 2022.
 
21.
OUBRAHIM H., BOULMANE M.,BAKKER M., AUGUSTO L., HALIM M. Carbon Storage in Degraded Cork Oak (Quercus Suber) Forests on Flat Lowlands in Morocco. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 9(1), 125, 2015.
 
22.
MAKHLOUFI M., ABOUROUH M., EL HARCHAOUI H. Structure Du Peuplement, Tarifs de Cubage et Essai de Traitements Sylvicoles Dans La Subéraie de Chefchaouen. In Annales de la Recherche Forestière au Maroc; National Center of Forestery Research: Rabat, Morocco, 39, 175, 2008 [In French].
 
23.
RUIZ-PEINADO GERTRUDIX R., MONTERO G., DEL RIO M. Biomass Models to Estimate Carbon Stocks for Hardwood Tree Species. Forest System, 21 (1), 42, 2012.
 
24.
RUIZ-PEINADO R., RÍO M., MONTERO G. New models for estimating the carbon sink capacity of Spanish soft wood species. Forest Systems, 20 (1), 176, 2011.
 
25.
ZAHER H., RHOUFACHA M., DAHMANI H. Carbon stock dynamics along a cork oak stand chronosequence: implications for climate-smart forest management. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 24, 45, 2025.
 
26.
CAO Y., CHEN Y. Biomass, carbon and nutrient storage in a 30-year-old Chinese cork oak (Quercus variabilis) forest on the south slope of the Qinling Mountains, China. Forests, 6 (4), 1239, 2015.
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top