Introduction

Soil heavy metal pollution, characterized by strong toxicity, irreversibility, and persistence, currently poses one of the most serious global environmental problems [1, 2]. Soil pollution, exacerbated by human activities, continues to worsen [3, 4], especially for heavy metals such as Cd, Cu, and Pb [5]. Given the foundational importance of soil in human production and life, contamination poses substantial risks and hazards to both humans and ecosystems [6, 7]. Accordingly, addressing soil heavy metal pollution is an urgent issue. Current remediation methods primarily comprise physical remediation, chemical remediation, and phytoremediation [8]. Despite their effectiveness, physical and chemical approaches carry numerous disadvantages, such as high costs, substantial energy consumption, risk of secondary pollution, and disruption of soil physical and chemical properties [9-11]. In contrast, the study of phytoremediation – an economical and green technology – is gaining wider traction [12]. This method employs hyperaccumulating plants and their respective rhizosphere microbial systems to absorb or stabilize heavy metals in the soil, thereby mitigating soil heavy metal pollution [13-15]. Despite the many advantages of phytoremediation – including environmental sustainability, in-situ remediation, and low cost [16, 17] – hyperaccumulating plants are often stunted, exhibit low biomass, and require prolonged remediation cycles under heavy metal stress, resulting in a slow, inefficient process [14, 18]. As such, enhancing the efficiency of hyperaccumulating plants in remedying soil heavy metal pollution currently galvanizes interest in plant remediation research.

Many studies have aimed to augment the tolerance and remediation capabilities of hyperaccumulators to soil heavy metals through the addition of chelating agents, inoculating agents, fertilization, and other methods [19-22]. Among these, fertilizers are often used to remediate heavy metal-contaminated soil because of their cost-effectiveness and availability. Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are typically the limiting nutrients in most ecosystems [23]. Applying N and P significantly spurs plant growth and boosts plant biomass [24-26]. Concurrently, adding N or P fertilizers to the soil can diminish the toxicity of heavy metals [27]. Research affirms that applying N fertilizer to heavy metal-polluted soil augments the transpiration rate and net photosynthetic efficiency of plants, elevates antioxidant enzymatic activity, and increases antioxidant matter in plants, thus strengthening cellular resistance to heavy metals and increasing biomass [28-30]. A moderate application of N fertilizer can further activate heavy metal ions in the soil by amending soil pH and conductivity, thereby enhancing plants’ remediation efficiency for soil heavy metal pollution. This deems it an efficacious enhancer of plant remediation for soil heavy metal pollution [31, 32]. Conversely, P is another plant-limiting element [33]. P application can invigorate root formation and growth in early stages, enhance plant stress resistance, and escalate heavy metal accumulation, thereby facilitating the remediation of heavy metal-polluted soil [34, 35]. Studies also discovered that the addition of N and P elements augments the shoot biomass of plant communities, and when both are added, they significantly increase plant shoot biomass [36, 37]. Our previous research also ascertained that N and P fertilizers in soils deficient in N and P can recuperate plant diversity in heavy metal-polluted soil [38], possibly attributed to the fact that N and P fertilizer increased plant tolerance to soil heavy metals [39]. Consequently, the addition of N and P fertilizers can enhance plant growth and alleviate the stress caused by heavy metals on plants. This implies that applying N and P fertilizers can ameliorate the remediation efficiency of soil heavy metal pollution by hyperaccumulators.

Bidens pilosa (B. pilosa) is an annual herbaceous plant found worldwide [40]. Studies have indicated that B. pilosa is a Cd hyperaccumulator plant with specific enrichment capacities for Cu and Pb [41-43]. Compared to other hyperaccumulator plants, B. pilosa showcases stronger tolerance to harsh environments, a faster growth rate, and a higher biomass [44]. These traits make it an ideal hyperaccumulator for remedying soil heavy metal pollution. Chen et al. reported that B. pilosa has a potent absorption and utilization rate of N and P elements in the soil, and certain levels of N and P can enhance root system growth and biomass accumulation [45]. Recent studies have demonstrated that the application of N fertilizer influences the evolution of photosynthetic products, antioxidant enzymes, and lipid peroxidation in B. pilosa, consequently affecting Cd extraction from the soil [46]. As a result, B. pilosa is more sensitive to N and P fertilizers, and a slight increase in N and P elements will enhance its biomass accumulation [47], which may improve its effectiveness in remediating soil heavy metal pollution. However, there is currently limited research on the influence of N, P, and NP fertilizers on the remediation of soil heavy metal pollution by B. pilosa. To address this knowledge gap, we carried out comparative experiments in a greenhouse to study the effects of these fertilizers on the soil heavy metal remediation efficiency of B. pilosa. Our findings serve as a guide for employing N and P fertilizers in the phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil, as well as offering technical assistance for phytoremediation in mining sites, abandoned lands, and industrial pollution areas.

Material and Methods

Material

Soil samples were collected from abandoned land in the Chenggong District of Kunming City at a depth of 0-10 cm. This soil was classified as acidic red soil. The samples were thoroughly cleared of debris, as well as animal and plant residues, before they were dried, crushed, and sieved through a 5-mesh screen to achieve a uniform mixture for subsequent use. The physicochemical background values of the experimental soil are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Physicochemical background values of experimental soil.

PropertiesValues
pH6.4
Cd(mg·kg-1)/
Cu(mg·kg-1)/
Pb(mg·kg-1)/
NO3--N(mg·kg-1)3.75
NH4+-N (mg·kg-1)0.82
Available P(mg·kg1)4.1

Experimental Design

To simulate conditions of heavy metal pollution, Cd, Cu, and Pb were incorporated into planting soils to achieve total concentrations of 10, 50, and 20 mg·kg-1, respectively. The soils were then deposited into 20 pots (45 cm × 20 cm× 20 cm), each pot filled with soil weighing 6.31 kg. The greenhouse experiments were divided into four treatments: CK treatment (control – only watered), NF treatment (urea added to achieve 30 mgN·kg-1), PF treatment (disodium hydrogen phosphate added to achieve 10 mgP·kg-1), and NPF treatment (both urea and disodium hydrogen phosphate added to achieve 30 mgN·kg-1 and 10 mgP·kg-1, respectively). Each treatment was replicated five times. Seeds of B. pilosa with similar morphologies were used in the experiments, with ten seeds evenly distributed in each pot – a density exceeding the natural population of B. pilosa. All treatments received the same watering and weeding methods. After approximately one year of growth, B. pilosa were harvested and measured. The experiment commenced in September 2021 and concluded in September 2022.

Indicator Measurement

We gently shook off the soil attached to the roots of B. pilosa and obtained intact plants at harvest time. Then, we rinsed the residual soil off of the plants using tap water, and measured the shoot height and root length after air drying. The plants were then placed into an envelope and dried in an oven at 70ºC for 72 hours. We weighed the shoot and root biomass of B. pilosa separately. After drying, we used the B. pilosa plants to determine the heavy metal content in their respective shoots and roots. To do this, we cut the shoots and roots into approximately 1 cm pieces, ground them into powder, and passed the powder through a 100-mesh sieve. Then we weighed 0.3 g of plant powder and digested it using a 10ml HNO3-HCl mixture (HNO3: HCl = 1:3, v/v). After the sample digestion solution was clarified, we diluted it to a constant volume of 50 ml using 5% HNO3 and determined the heavy metal content of Cu, Cd, and Pb using ICP-MS.

Data Compilation and Analysis

(1)
Shoot root ratio (SRR)=Lshoot/Lroot

SRR represented the ratio of shoot height to root length, where Lshoot is the shoot height (cm), and Lroot is the root length (cm).

(2)
Root tolerance index (RTI)=Ltreatment/LCK

RTI represented the root tolerance index, which reflected the plant tolerance to heavy metals, where Ltreatment is the root length (cm) of the plant for each treatment and LCK is the root length (cm) of the control group.

(3)
Accumulation (A)=Cplant*Mplant

A represented accumulation, which was one of the most important indicators of phytoremediation of soil heavy metal pollution, and it is closely related to plant growth and biomass accumulation, where Cplant is the concentration of heavy metals in plant tissues (mg·kg-1) and Mplant is the biomass of plants (kg).

(4)
Transfer Coefficient (TC)=Cshoots/Croots

TC represented the transfer coefficient, which reflected the ability of plants to transport and enrich heavy metals from below to above ground, where Cshoots is the concentration of heavy metals in the shoots part of the plant (mg·kg-1) and Croots is the concentration of heavy metals in the roots part of the plant (mg·kg-1).

Microsoft Excel 2021 was used to sort the data and draw the charts, and IBM SPSS Statistics 26 was used to analyze the differences in growth status, biomass, heavy metal content, accumulation, and the transfer coefficient of B. pilosa under different treatments.

Results

Effects of Different Treatments on the Growth of B. pilosa

We found that the shoot height and root length of B. pilosa were significantly higher in the NF and NPF treatments than in CK (P<0.05), with shoot height being higher by 107.6% and 145.9%, respectively (Fig. 1). The PF treatment had no significant effect on shoot height or root length. The SRR in the PF, NF and NPF treatments was significantly higher (P<0.05), especially for the NF treatment where SSR was 81.1% higher. There were significant differences (P<0.05) in the RTI between PF, NF, and NPF treatments. These results indicated that N and NP fertilization increased shoot height, root length, SRR, and RTI, and that NP fertilization had the strongest overall effect.

Fig. 1.

Effects of different treatments on shoot height a), root length b), SRR c), and RTI d) of B. pilosa. The values of different lowercase letters on the bars indicate a statistically significant difference between different treatments, with P<0.05.

https://www.pjoes.com/f/fulltexts/183161/PolJEnvironStud-2024-33-5-5991-6000_Fig_1_min.jpg

Effects of Different Treatments on the Biomass of B. pilosa

We also found that both biomass and the root-shoot ratio of B. pilosa exhibited significant differences among various treatments (P<0.05) (Fig. 2). In comparison to the CK treatment, the NF and NPF treatments notably augmented the shoot biomass of B. pilosa (P<0.05) – the NPF treatment even boosted the shoot biomass of B. pilosa by a factor of 4.22. Conversely, the root-shoot ratio from the NF and NPF treatments was significantly lower (P<0.05). The PF treatment did not significantly influence either the biomass or the root-shoot ratio. These findings suggested that N and NP fertilization significantly encouraged biomass accumulation – particularly the shoot biomass – whereas P fertilization did not have a substantial impact on the biomass of B. pilosa.

Effects of Different Treatments on the Contents of Heavy Metals Cd, Cu, and Pb in Each Part of B. pilosa

As demonstrated in Fig. 3, the NPF treatment had significantly lower Cd, Cu, and Pb contents in both the roots and shoots of B. pilosa (P<0.05). While the NF treatment also had lower Cd contents in the roots and shoots and lower Cu and Pb contents in the roots of B. pilosa (P<0.05), it did not have a significant effect on the Cu and Pb levels in the plant’s shoots. In contrast, the PF treatment had significantly lower Cu content across all components and lower Pb content within the shoots, the PF treatment did not significantly affect Cd content. However, the PF treatment did have notably higher Pb content within the roots of B. pilosa (P<0.05). These findings suggest that NP fertilization methods considerably decrease the content of Cd, Cu, and Pb in each component of the plant, and P fertilization methods simultaneously increase Pb levels within the root system of B. pilosa.

Fig. 2.

Effects of different treatments on the shoots a), roots biomass b), and root-shoot ratio c) of B. Pilosa. The values of different lowercase letters on the bars indicate a statistically significant difference between different treatments, with P<0.05.

https://www.pjoes.com/f/fulltexts/183161/PolJEnvironStud-2024-33-5-5991-6000_Fig_2_min.jpg
Fig. 3.

Effects of different treatments on the contents of Cd, Cu, and Pb in the shoots and roots of B. pilosa. The values of different lowercase letters on the bars indicate a statistically significant difference between different treatments, with P<0.05.

https://www.pjoes.com/f/fulltexts/183161/PolJEnvironStud-2024-33-5-5991-6000_Fig_3_min.jpg

Effects of Different Treatments on the Accumulation Of Cd, Cu and Pb in Each Part of B. pilosa

As shown in Table 2, the NPF treatment had significantly higher accumulations of Cd, Cu, and Pb in the shoots of B. pilosa (P<0.05) – levels were 2.60, 3.58, and 3.49 times higher, respectively. When compared to the control group (CK), NPF treatment did not significantly affect the accumulation of Cd, Cu, and Pb in B. pilosa roots. The NF treatment had higher accumulations of Cd, Cu, and Pb in the shoots, but lower accumulations of these elements in the roots (P<0.05). The PF treatment did not significantly impact Cd, Cu, or Pb accumulation in the shoots, or Cd accumulation in the roots. When comparing the PF treatment with the CK group, the PF treatment had significantly lower Cu accumulation in the roots, but higher Pb accumulation (P< 0.05). Our results indicated that both N and NP fertilization caused B. pilosa to have significantly higher Cd, Pb, and Cu accumulation in the shoots, with NP fertilization having the strongest effect. P fertilization, in contrast, did not have a significant effect on Cd, Pb, and Cu accumulation in the shoots, but led to higher Pb accumulation in the roots.

Table 2.

Effects of different treatments on the accumulation of heavy metals Cd, Cu, and Pb in the shoots and roots parts of B. pilosa.

TreatmentAccumulation of shoots/mgAccumulation of roots/ug
CdCuPbCdCuPb
CK0.11±0.01c0.18±0.02c0.13±0.01c11.73±1.57a46.15±4.72a2.74±0.38b
PF0.13±0.02c0.16±0.02c0.15±0.01c12.67±0.96a33.04±2.39b3.69±0.30a
NF0.19±0.03b0.52±0.09b0.38±0.07b6.46±0.37b23.40±2.71c2.14±0.17c
NPF0.27±0.03a0.63±0.04a0.47±0.02a11.62±1.19a41.36±3.59a2.53±0.24b

[i] Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 4. The different lowercase letters after the same column of numbers indicate a statistically significant difference between different treatments, with P<0.05.

Table 3.

Effects of different treatments on the transfer coefficient of Cd, Cu, and Pb of B. pilosa.

TreatmentTransfer coefficient (TC)
CdCuPb
CK1.37±0.09b0.58±0.02d7.46±0.39c
PF1.39±0.07b0.68±0.05c5.57±0.44d
NF1.81±0.10a1.44±0.04a10.74±0.78b
NPF1.52±0.11b0.99±0.06b12.00±0.66a

[i] Data are expressed as mean±SD, n = 4. The different lowercase letters after the same column of numbers indicate a statistically significant difference between different treatments, with P<0.05.

Effects of Different Treatments on the Transfer Coefficient of Cd, Cu and Pb of B. pilosa

Table 3 shows that the TC of Cd and Cu in B. pilosa rose under different treatments. In comparison with the control group, NF and NPF treatments had significantly higher TC of Cu and Pb in B. pilosa (P<0.05), with NF treatment yielding the highest TC of 1.44 for Cu, whereas the NPF treatment produced a maximum Pb TC of 12.00. No significant difference was observed in the Cd TC when B. pilosa was treated with PF, although the Cu TC was notably higher. However, the Pb TC was significantly lower in the PF treatment (P<0.05). Our results suggested that N and NP fertilization significantly enhanced the absorption of Cd, Cu, and Pb by B. pilosa and their subsequent transfer to the shoot parts. Of these treatments, N application most robustly facilitated the transfer of Cd and Cu by B. pilosa, while the concurrent application of NP most forcefully promoted the transfer of Pb by B. pilosa.

Discussion

Fertilization Increases Shoot Height and Biomass of B. pilosa

Our study found that nitrogen (N) application promoted the growth of B. pilosa, increasing both plant height and shoot biomass (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). Other studies have reported similar findings; for instance, N application increased the heavy-metal cadmium (Cd) resistance of Solanum nigrum L. and promoted biomass accumulation [30]. This effect can be attributed to N being a vital element for plants. Its application, through fertilization, boosts the synthesis of plant stress-resistant substances, enhancing plants’ resilience to heavy-metal stress and, hence, fostering growth [19,48]. The coupling of N and phosphorus (P) nutrients is commonplace in natural ecosystems. A significant interaction exists between the soil availability of N and P [49] and adding N and P nutrients results in a synergistic effect on plant growth. The accumulation of plant biomass under the combined application of NP is greater than that under the individual addition of N or P [50]. Our research results suggest that the combined application of NP significantly influences the growth and biomass of B. pilosa (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). For example, the mixed application of N and P has a greater impact on the biomass of grass plants [51,52], alpine meadow plants [53], and angiosperms [54] than the application of N or P fertilizers. This difference might be because N and P enhance plant photosynthesis [55], promoting organic matter accumulation in plant shoot parts [56]. Furthermore, N and P fertilizers can reduce heavy metal toxicity to plants [57] or inhibit oxidative stress caused by heavy metal stress, enhance the enzyme activity of plant antioxidants [30], subsequently increasing plant biomass.

Given that roots are the principal organs that plants utilize to absorb both water and nutrients, their growth and development directly impact plant growth and yield accumulation [58]. The root tolerance index (RTI) is the ratio of root length in each treatment relative to that of the control, and reflects plant tolerance to heavy metals [59,60]. Roots are the first to come into contact with heavy metals during plant growth, which then absorb or reject them. Concurrently, there exist numerous sites on the root cell wall that can exchange, absorb, or fix heavy metal ions – ultimately promoting or inhibiting further transportation of heavy metal ions to the aboveground part [61]. In our study, under NF and NPF treatment, the root length of B. pilosa significantly increased by 14.6% and 62.7%, respectively, and displayed a high RTI (Fig. 1). Consequently, it can be inferred that the addition of N and NP fertilizers expanded the nutrient absorption space of B. pilosa in soil, bolstering its tolerance to heavy metals and thus contributing to the increase in B. pilosa biomass.

Fertilization Decreased Heavy Metal Content but Increased Heavy Metal Accumulation in B. pilosa

Our research results demonstrate that the combined application of NP decreases the content of Cd, Cu, and Pb in B. pilosa, notably the Cd content. The use of N fertilizer reduced the content of Cd in the shoot portion and Cd, Cu, and Pb in the root portion of B. pilosa (Fig. 3). Previous studies have established that N and P differentially impact the absorption of heavy metals by plants. The addition of N and P either promoted the absorption of Cd by Brassica napus [62] or inhibited the content of Cd in corn [63]. Utilizing N fertilizer decreased the Cd and Zn content in Triticum polonicum L. [64]. A combination of low N fertilizer and high P fertilizer significantly reduced the Cu content in the shoot portions of castor (Ricinus communis L.) [65], aligning with our findings. This reduction may be due to N and P fertilizer reducing the bioavailability of heavy metals in soil by affecting the morphology and complexation of heavy metals, thereby reducing the movement of heavy metals and absorption by plant roots [66, 67].

Additionally, our results indicated that applying N fertilizer and NP fertilizer facilitates the increase of heavy metal accumulation in the shoots of B. pilosa, with the combined application of NP producing the best results (Table 2). Other studies have yielded similar results, such as the application of N fertilizer enhancing the accumulation of heavy metals Zn and Cd in hyperaccumulators of Sedum alfredii Hance [68], and boosting the accumulation of heavy metals Pb in Cannabis sativa L. [48]. Research has also discovered that the combined application of NP amplifies the accumulation of heavy metals in the shoot portions of plant communities [39]. In our study, applying NP together reduced the content of heavy metals Cd, Cu, and Pb in the shoot portion of B. pilosa (Fig. 3). Conversely, the accumulation of heavy metals Cd, Cu, and Pb in the shoot portion of B. pilosa increased by 2.0-3.5 times when NP fertilizer was applied (Table 2).This accumulation is attributed to NP fertilizers significantly stimulating the shoot biomass of B. pilosa, which was 4.2 times higher than the control (Fig. 2). The contents of Cd, Cu, and Pb in plants only decreased by 1.1-1.6 times, leading to the accumulation of heavy metals in the shoot portions of B. pilosa treated with NP.

Efficiency of Fertilization on Improving the Remediation Efficiency of B. pilosa

The remediation efficiency of plants for heavy metal pollution in soil is primarily mirrored in components such as biomass, heavy metal enrichment, and the transfer coefficient [69-71]. This is because phytoremediation primarily focuses on remediating soil pollution by extracting heavy metals from plant shoot tissues [72]. This study demonstrated that applying nitrogen (N) fertilizer and nitrogen-phosphorus (NP) fertilizer significantly enhanced biomass accumulation in the shoot portion of the B. pilosa plant and increased the enrichment of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, and Pb) in the same part (Fig. 2, Table 2). Fertilizers may indirectly influence the accumulation of heavy metals in plants by affecting soil pH, ion strength, rhizosphere chemistry, and microbial activity, thus altering the uptake of heavy metals by the plants [73, 74].

We also showed that applying N and NP fertilizers combined increased the transfer coefficients of Cd, Cu, and Pb in B. pilosa, with transfer coefficients for Cd and Pb all exceeding 1 (Table 3). Similar studies have shown that N or phosphorus (P) fertilizers increase the transfer coefficients of heavy metals in various species, including B. pilosa [75], rice [76], and wheat [77]. Thus, applying N and P fertilizer allows for a larger harvest of B. pilosa per unit area each growing season, enabling greater Cd, Cu, and Pb transfer to the shoot portion, enriching this part with more heavy metals, and thus enhancing the remediation efficiency for Cd, Cu, and Pb heavy metal pollution in soil by B. pilosa.

Overall, we found that applying N fertilizer and NP combined can enhance the efficiency and feasibility of remediating Cd, Cu, and Pb heavy metal pollution in soil using B. pilosa. Given the increasing soil pollution of these heavy metals, our research holds guidance value for remediating them with B. pilosa, and even for remediating heavy metal pollution in soil with other hyperaccumulators. Further study is needed on the mechanics of the antagonistic and synergistic effects of heavy metals within plants, and the interactions between heavy metals and N and P.

Conclusions

Our findings indicated that nitrogen (N) and nitrogen-phosphorous (NP) fertilization may enhance the growth of B. pilosa shoot height and root length, augment its biomass, and improve the remediation efficiency of B. pilosa concerning heavy metals such as Cd, Cu, and Pb. This improvement could be attributed to the manner in which N and NP fertilization strengthens the B. pilosa root system’s tolerance, encourages biomass accumulation in its shoots, and increases the accumulation of heavy metals Cd, Cu, and Pb in soil by the shoots, thus advancing the remediation efficiency of these heavy metals in B. pilosa. Therefore, incorporating N and NP fertilization may significantly contribute to improving the remediation efficiency of soil heavy metal pollution by hyperaccumulators, providing technical guidance for remediating soil heavy metal pollution. Further study is needed on the mechanics of the antagonistic and synergistic effects of heavy metals within plants, and the interactions between heavy metals and N and P.