ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Study on the Sector Coverages
in the National Carbon Market – From
the Perspective of Synergistic Emission
Reduction of CO2 and Air Pollutants
More details
Hide details
1
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200082, China
2
Zhejiang Province Key Think Tank: Institute of Ecological Civilization, Zhejiang A&F University,
Hangzhou 311300, China
Submission date: 2024-06-07
Final revision date: 2024-08-09
Acceptance date: 2024-10-28
Online publication date: 2024-12-02
Publication date: 2025-11-14
Corresponding author
Xingwang Zhu
Zhejiang Province Key Think Tank: Institute of Ecological Civilization, Zhejiang A&F University,
Hangzhou 311300, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(6):8391-8403
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Promoting synergistic governance of CO2 emissions and air pollutant emissions reduction
in the carbon market is crucial for China’s transition towards sustainable development. This study
combines complete forward and backward linkages coefficients from input-output analysis with costeffective
analysis to show how to enhance the synergistic effects of the national carbon market in CO2
emissions and air pollutant emissions reduction from a sectoral selection perspective and discuss
the optimal sector inclusion sequence under different policy objectives using the 2020 non-competitive
input-output table of 29 sectors. The results demonstrate that to enhance the synergistic effects
of the national carbon market, sectors such as Coal Mining and Dressing, Oil and Gas Extraction,
Petroleum and Coal Processing, Metal Smelting and Pressing, Electricity and Heat Production, as
well as Transportation, should be included; sectors like Papermaking, Non-metallic Mineral Products,
and Chemicals should not be included, which have low synergistic effects. The optimal sector inclusion
sequence should be determined by combining different emission constraints
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
LI Z., WANG J., CHE S. Synergistic Effect of Carbon Trading Scheme on Carbon Dioxide and Atmospheric Pollutants. Sustainability. 13 (10), 5403, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su1310....
2.
ZHAO Y., SU S., XING Y., YU L., CUI S., JIANG D., XIAO Z. The Green Bonus: Carbon Reduction Effect of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Trading Pilot Scheme. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 10, 917887, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.....
3.
LIN B., JIA Z. Does the different sectoral coverage matter? An analysis of China's carbon trading market. Energy Policy. 137, 111164, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
4.
CHEN L., WANG D., SHI R. Can China's Carbon Emissions Trading System Achieve the Synergistic Effect of Carbon Reduction and Pollution Control? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (15), 8932, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid:35897297 PMCid:PMC9330243.
5.
ZENG Q., HE L. Study on the synergistic effect of air pollution prevention and carbon emission reduction in the context of "dual carbon": Evidence from China's transport sector. Energy Policy. 173, 113370, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
6.
CHEN Y., ZHAO Z., YI W., HONG J., ZHANG B. Has China achieved synergistic reduction of carbon emissions and air pollution? Evidence from 283 Chinese cities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 103, 107277, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
7.
LIU H., GUO L., QIAO L. Quantitative Evaluation of Co-Benefits of Air Pollution Reduction and Carbon Emission Reduction: Based on Marginal Abatement Cost. Statistical Research. 40, 19, 2023.
8.
FAN H., LIANG C. The pollutant and carbon emissions reduction synergistic effect of green fiscal policy: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters. 58 (2), 104446, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.....
9.
WU Q. Price and scale effects of China's carbon emission trading system pilots on emission reduction. Journal of Environmental Management. 314 (17), 115054, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:35430515.
10.
ZHANG Y., HUANG Y. Killing Two Birds with One Stone or Missing One of Them? The Synergistic Governance Effect of China's Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme on Pollution Control and Carbon Emission Reduction. Sustainability. 15 (13), 10147, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su1513....
13.
QIAN H., ZHOU Y., WU L. Evaluating various choices of sector coverage in China's national emissions trading system (ETS). Climate Policy. 18, 7, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1080/146930....
14.
HU Y., YU Y., MARDANI A. Selection of carbon emissions control industries in China: An approach based on complex networks control perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 172, 121030, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
15.
SHEN L., LOU Y., HUANGN Y., CHEN J. A driving-driven perspective on the key carbon emission sectors in China. Natural Hazards. 93 (1), 349, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069....
16.
CHEN H., CHEN W., HE J. Pathway to meet carbon emission peak target and air quality standard for China. China Population, Resources and Environment. 30, 12, 2020.
17.
ZHOU L., XIA Y., CHEN W. Review of low carbon development targets and relative co-benefits in China. China Population, Resources and Environment. 30, 10, 2020.
18.
DONG F., YU B., PAN Y. Examining the synergistic effect of CO₂ emissions on PM₂.₅ emissions reduction: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 223, 759, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
19.
CHAE Y. Co-benefit analysis of an air quality management plan and greenhouse gas reduction strategies in the Seoul metropolitan area. Environmental Science and Policy. 13 (3), 205, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envs....
20.
SHIH Y., TSENNG C. Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable energy development using life-cycle co-benefits assessment and the system dynamics approach. Applied Energy. 119 (15), 57, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apen....
21.
CHANG N. Changing industrial structure to reduce carbon dioxide emissions: a Chinese application. Journal of Cleaner Production. 103, 40, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
22.
LEONTIEF W. Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic Systems of the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 18 (3), 105, 1936.
https://doi.org/10.2307/192783....