ORIGINAL RESEARCH
The Effects of Environmental Regulation on Environmental Equity: Evidence from China
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Economics and Management, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi 541006, China
 
 
Submission date: 2024-02-05
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-03-30
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-04-13
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-11-21
 
 
Publication date: 2025-01-09
 
 
Corresponding author
Chenyang Guo   

School of Economics and Management, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi 541006, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(2):1621-1639
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Sustainable development plays a decisive role in achieving the Chinese government's goal of "carbon peaking and carbon neutrality". Taking panel data from 31 provinces in China from 2003-2021, we constructed a fixed-effects econometric model to study the effect of environmental regulation (ER) on environmental equity (EE). The link between ER and EE was explored. The results show that the ER indeed has a beneficial effect on EE and exhibits significant regional and individual characteristics heterogeneity. Particularly, the effect of ER on EE is stronger in Chinese eastern and middle regions and in provinces with lower incomes, higher tax costs, and higher innovation levels. In addition, mechanism analysis reveals that the favorable effect of ER on EE is affected in three ways: government greening services, energy industrial investment, and public environmental attention. Finally, our findings provide an important decision-making reference for advancing the development of ecological civilization and implementing the new development philosophy of a green economy.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (70)
1.
CHARLEUX L. Contingencies of environmental justice: the case of individual mobility and Grenoble's Low-Emission Zone. *Urban Geography*, 35(2), 197, 2014. <https://doi.org/10.1080/027236...>.
 
2.
ITO K., ZHANG S. Willingness to Pay for Clean Air: Evidence from Air Purifier Markets in China. *Journal of Political Economy*, 128(5), 1627, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1086/705554>.
 
3.
YUAN H., ZOU L., LUO X., FENG Y. How Does Manufacturing Agglomeration Affect Green Development? A Spatial and Nonlinear Perspective. *International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health*, 19(16), 2022. <https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph...> PMid:36012039 PMCid:PMC9408180.
 
4.
LI Y., CHIU Y.-H., WANG L., ZHOU Y., LIN T.-Y. Dynamic and network slack-based measure analysis of China's regional energy and air pollution reduction efficiencies. *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 251, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...>.
 
5.
LI Y., WU H., SHEN K., HAO Y., ZHANG P. Is environmental pressure distributed equally in China? Empirical evidence from provincial and industrial panel data analysis. *Science of the Total Environment*, 718, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit...> PMid:32325619.
 
6.
WANG H., LU X., DENG Y., SUN Y., NIELSENS C.P., LI Y., ZHU G., BU M., BI J., MCELROY M.B. China's CO₂ peak before 2030 implied from characteristics and growth of cities. *Nature Sustainability*, 2(8), 748, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893...>.
 
7.
ZHANG W\.-W., ZHAO B., DING D., SHARP B., GU Y., XU S.-C., XING J., WANG S.-X., LIOU K.-N., RAO L.-L. Co-benefits of subnationally differentiated carbon pricing policies in China: Alleviation of heavy PM₂.₅ pollution and improvement in environmental equity. *Energy Policy*, 149, 112060, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo...>.
 
8.
WANG J., WANG W., RAN Q., IRFAN M., REN S., YANG X., WU H., AHMAD M. Analysis of the mechanism of the impact of internet development on green economic growth: Evidence from 269 prefecture cities in China. *Environmental Science and Pollution Research*, 29(7), 9990, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356...> PMid:34510353.
 
9.
FENG Y., ZOU L., YUAN H., DAI L. The spatial spillover effects and impact paths of financial agglomeration on green development: Evidence from 285 prefecture-level cities in China. *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 340, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...>.
 
10.
YASUMOTO S., NAKAYA T., JONES A.P. Quantitative Environmental Equity Analysis of Perceived Accessibility to Urban Parks in Osaka Prefecture, Japan. *Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy*, 14(2), 337, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061...>.
 
11.
SCHLENKER W., WALKER W\.R. Airports, Air Pollution, and Contemporaneous Health. *Review of Economic Studies*, 83(2), 768, 2016. <https://doi.org/10.1093/restud...>.
 
12.
CHALFIN A., DANAGOULIAN S., DEZA M. More sneezing, less crime? Health shocks and the market for offenses. *Journal of Health Economics*, 68, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhea...> PMid:31585379.
 
13.
UNFRIED K., KIS-KATOS K., POSER T. Water scarcity and social conflict. *Journal of Environmental Economics and Management*, 113, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem...>.
 
14.
WU H., XIA Y., YANG X., HAO Y., REN S. Does environmental pollution promote China's crime rate? A new perspective through government official corruption. *Structural Change and Economic Dynamics*, 57, 292, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stru...>.
 
15.
XIE G., CUI Z., REN S., LI K. Pathways to carbon neutrality: how do government corruption and resource misallocation affect carbon emissions? *Environmental Science and Pollution Research*, 30(14), 40283, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356...> PMid:36609759.
 
16.
KARPLUS V.J., WU M. Dynamic responses of SO₂ pollution to China's environmental inspections. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences*, 120(17), 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2...> PMid:37068224 PMCid:PMC10151602.
 
17.
KARPLUS V.J., ZHANG J., ZHAO J. Navigating and Evaluating the Labyrinth of Environmental Regulation in China. *Review of Environmental Economics and Policy*, 15(2), 300, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1086/715582>.
 
18.
YAN C., LI H., LI Z. Environmental pollution and economic growth: Evidence of SO₂ emissions and GDP in China. *Frontiers in Public Health*, 10, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh....> PMid:36438209 PMCid:PMC9684716.
 
19.
BU W., REN S. Does economic growth target constraint put pressure on green energy efficiency? Evidence from China. *Environmental Science and Pollution Research*, 30(11), 31171, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356...> PMid:36445521.
 
20.
LIU Y., WANG J. Environmental pollution, environmental regulation, and labor income share. *Environmental Science and Pollution Research*, 27(36), 45161, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356...> PMid:32779069.
 
21.
BROWN J.R., MARTINSSON G., THOMANN C. Can Environmental Policy Encourage Technical Change? Emissions Taxes and R\&D Investment in Polluting Firms. *The Review of Financial Studies*, 35(10), 4518, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hh...>.
 
22.
WU L.B., YANG M.M., SUN K.G. Impact of public environmental attention on environmental governance of enterprises and local governments. *China Population, Resources and Environment*, 32(02), 1, 2022.
 
23.
KATO-HUERTA J., GENELETTI D. A distributive environmental justice index to support green space planning in cities. *Landscape and Urban Planning*, 229, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land...>.
 
24.
SILVA L.T., FONSECA F., PIRES M., MENDES B. SAUS: A tool for preserving urban green areas from air pollution. *Urban Forestry & Urban Greening*, 46, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug...>.
 
25.
VIEIRA J., MATOS P., MEXIA T., SILVA P., LOPES N., FREITAS C., CORREIA O., SANTOS-REIS M., BRANQUINHO C., PINHO P. Green spaces are not all the same for the provision of air purification and climate regulation services: The case of urban parks. *Environmental Research*, 160, 306, 2018. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envr...> PMid:29040950.
 
26.
DONOVAN G.H. Including public-health benefits of trees in urban-forestry decision making. *Urban Forestry & Urban Greening*, 22, 120, 2017. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug...>.
 
27.
SCHEBELLA M.F., WEBER D., SCHULTZ L., WEINSTEIN P. The Wellbeing Benefits Associated with Perceived and Measured Biodiversity in Australian Urban Green Spaces. *Sustainability*, 11(3), 2019. <https://doi.org/10.3390/su1103...>.
 
28.
ZHOU X., PARVES RANA M. Social benefits of urban green space. *Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal*, 23(2), 173, 2012. <https://doi.org/10.1108/147778...>.
 
29.
MARCHEGGIANI S., TINTI D., PUCCINELLI C., MANCINI L. Urban green space and healthy living: an exploratory study among Appia Antica parks users (Rome-Italy). *Fresenius Environmental Bulletin*, 28(6), 4984, 2019.
 
30.
RUBASHKINA Y., GALEOTTI M., VERDOLINI E. Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. *Energy Policy*, 83, 288, 2015. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo...>.
 
31.
ALBERTINI E. The Contribution of Management Control Systems to Environmental Capabilities. *Journal of Business Ethics*, 159(4), 1163, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551...>.
 
32.
PAN D., TANG J. The effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on water pollution control: Quasi-natural experimental evidence from China. *Science of The Total Environment*, 751, 141550, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit...> PMid:32871310.
 
33.
ZHANG Q., YU Z., KONG D. The real effect of legal institutions: Environmental courts and firm environmental protection expenditure. *Journal of Environmental Economics and Management*, 98, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem...>.
 
34.
LIU J., XUE Y., MAO Z., IRFAN M., WU H. How to improve total factor energy efficiency under climate change: does export sophistication matter? *Environmental Science and Pollution Research*, 30(10), 28162, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356...> PMid:36399290 PMCid:PMC9672658.
 
35.
OUYANG X., LIN B. An analysis of the driving forces of energy-related carbon dioxide emissions in China's industrial sector. *Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews*, 45, 838, 2015. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser...>.
 
36.
WEN H., JIANG M., ZHENG S. Impact of information and communication technologies on corporate energy intensity: evidence from cross-country micro data. *Journal of Environmental Planning and Management*, 67(4), 897, 2024. <https://doi.org/10.1080/096405...>.
 
37.
XIAO S.S., LEW Y.K., PARK B.I. International Network Searching, Learning, and Explorative Capability: Small and Medium-sized Enterprises from China. *Management International Review*, 60(4), 597, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575...>.
 
38.
XU L., YANG L., LI D., SHAO S. Asymmetric effects of heterogeneous environmental standards on green technology innovation: Evidence from China. *Energy Economics*, 117, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec...>.
 
39.
YAN Z., ZHOU Z., DU K. How does environmental regulatory stringency affect energy consumption? Evidence from Chinese firms. *Energy Economics*, 118, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec...>.
 
40.
KRAMARZ T. Extractive industry disasters and community responses: a typology of vulnerable subjects. *Environmental Politics*, 31(1), 89, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1080/096440...>.
 
41.
SAHANI J., KUMAR P., DEBELE S., SPYROU C., LOUPIS M., ARAGAO L., PORCU F., SHAH M.A.R., DI SABATINO S. Hydro-meteorological risk assessment methods and management by nature-based solutions. *Science of The Total Environment*, 696, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit...>.
 
42.
LU Y., WANG Y., ZUO J., JIANG H., HUANG D., RAMEEZDEEN R. Characteristics of public concern on haze in China and its relationship with air quality in urban areas. *Science of The Total Environment*, 637, 1597, 2018. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit...> PMid:29801253.
 
43.
WEN H., LEE C.-C. Impact of environmental labeling certification on firm performance: Empirical evidence from China. *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 255, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...>.
 
44.
DENG F., LI H., YANG M., ZHAO W., GAI Z., GUO Y., HUANG J., HAO Y., WU H. On the nonlinear relationship between energy consumption and economic and social development: evidence from Henan Province, China. *Environmental Science and Pollution Research*, 28(25), 33192, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356...> PMid:33638078.
 
45.
CAI X., LI Z., SCOTT E.M., LI X., TANG M. Short-term effects of atmospheric particulate matter on myocardial infarction: a cumulative meta-analysis. *Environmental Science and Pollution Research*, 23(7), 6139, 2016. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356...> PMid:26846245.
 
46.
DASTOORPOOR M., GOUDARZI G., KHANJAN N., IDANI E., AGHABABAEIAN H., BAHRAMPOUR A. Lag Time Structure Of Cardiovascular Deaths Attributed To Ambient Air Pollutants In Ahvaz, Iran, 2008–2015. *International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health*, 31(4), 459, 2018. <https://doi.org/10.13075/ijome...> PMid:29546882.
 
47.
ERBAS B., SHRESTHA S.K., DHARMAGE S.C., KATELARIS C., DAVIES J., ABRAMSON M.J. The effects of Air Pollution on asthma Hospital admissions in Adelaide, South Australia, 2003–2013: time series and case-crossover analysis. *Clinical and Experimental Allergy*, 46(12), 1623, 2016. <https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.12...> <https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.12...> PMid:27797423.
 
48.
HE X., SHI J. The effect of air pollution on Chinese green bond market: The mediation role of public concern. *Journal of Environmental Management*, 325, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv...> <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv...> PMid:36306625.
 
49.
LI G., WEN H. The low-carbon effect of pursuing the honor of civilization? A quasi-experiment in Chinese cities. *Economic Analysis and Policy*, 78, 343, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap....> <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap....>.
 
50.
YANG M., YAN X.H., LI Q.Y. Study on the impact of environmental regulation on the efficiency of industrial pollution control in China. *China Population, Resources and Environment*, 30(09), 54, 2020.
 
51.
KUEHNEL N., HUANG W\.-C., MOECKEL R. Environmental Equity Analysis in Agent-Based Transport Simulations: A Study on Causation and Exposure. *Procedia Computer Science*, 184, 650, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proc...>.
 
52.
MIAO Z., BALEZENTIS T., SHAO S., CHANG D. Energy use, industrial soot and vehicle exhaust pollution—China's regional air pollution recognition, performance decomposition and governance. *Energy Economics*, 83, 501, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec...> <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec...>.
 
53.
XIONG W., HAN Y., CRABBE M.J.C., YUE X.-G. Fiscal Expenditures on Science and Technology and Environmental Pollution: Evidence from China. *International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health*, 17(23), 2020. <https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph...> <https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph...> PMid:33255740 PMCid:PMC7728311.
 
54.
ZHENG S., ZHOU F., WEN H. The Relationship between Trade Liberalization and Environmental Pollution across Enterprises with Different Levels of Viability in China. *Emerging Markets Finance and Trade*, 58(8), 2125, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1080/154049...> <https://doi.org/10.1080/154049...>.
 
55.
XIA F., XING J., XU J., PAN X. The short-term impact of air pollution on medical expenditures: Evidence from Beijing. *Journal of Environmental Economics and Management*, 114, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem...> <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem...>.
 
56.
CHEN J.-X., ZHANG Y., ZHENG S. Ecoefficiency, environmental regulation opportunity costs, and interregional industrial transfers: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China. *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 233, 611, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...> <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...> PMCid:PMC7592848.
 
57.
LU Y., YU L. Trade Liberalization and Markup Dispersion: Evidence from China's WTO Accession. *American Economic Journal: Applied Economics*, 7(4), 221, 2015. <https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20...> <https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20...>.
 
58.
CHEN Z., KAHN M.E., LIU Y., WANG Z. The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China. *Journal of Environmental Economics and Management*, 88, 468, 2018. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem...>.
 
59.
CHEN S.Y., CHEN D.K. Haze pollution, Government Governance and High-Quality Economic Development. *Economic Research*, 53(02), 20, 2018.
 
60.
ANDERSON J.E., YOTOV Y.V. Terms of trade and global efficiency effects of free trade agreements, 1990–2002. *Journal of International Economics*, 99, 279, 2016. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jint...>.
 
61.
GAO O.H., KLEIN R.A. Environmental equity in participation of the Clean Air School Bus Program: The case of New York State. *Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment*, 15(4), 220, 2010. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd....> <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd....>.
 
62.
ZHOU F., WANG X. The carbon emissions trading scheme and green technology innovation in China: A new structural economics perspective. *Economic Analysis and Policy*, 74, 365, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap....> <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap....>.
 
63.
CAO K., ZHANG W., LIU S., HUANG B., HUANG W. Pareto law-based regional inequality analysis of PM2.5 air pollution and economic development in China. *Journal of Environmental Management*, 252, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv...> <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv...> PMid:31610446 PMCid:PMC7592848.
 
64.
GRAY S.C., EDWARDS S.E., MIRANDA M.L. Race, socioeconomic status, and air pollution exposure in North Carolina. *Environmental Research*, 126, 152, 2013. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envr...> <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envr...> PMid:23850144.
 
65.
BARYSHNIKOVA N.V. Pollution abatement and environmental equity: A dynamic study. *Journal of Urban Economics*, 68(2), 183, 2010. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue....> <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue....>.
 
66.
HAVARD S., DEGUEN S., ZMIROU-NAVIER D., SCHILLINGER C., BARD D. Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Socioeconomic Status: A Spatial Autocorrelation Study to Assess Environmental Equity on a Small-Area Scale. *Epidemiology*, 20(6), S33, 2009. <https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b...> <https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede...>.
 
67.
MEARS M., BRINDLEY P., MAHESWARAN R., JORGENSEN A. Understanding the socioeconomic equity of publicly accessible greenspace distribution: The example of Sheffield, UK. *Geoforum*, 103, 126, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geof...> <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geof...>.
 
68.
ZHANG H., XU T., FENG C. Does public participation promote environmental efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of environmental information disclosure in China. *Energy Economics*, 108, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec...> <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec...>.
 
69.
ZHANG K., ZHANG Z.-Y., LIANG Q.-M. An empirical analysis of the green paradox in China: From the perspective of fiscal decentralization. *Energy Policy*, 103, 203, 2017. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo...> <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo...>.
 
70.
ZHAO X., LIU C., SUN C., YANG M. Does stringent environmental regulation lead to a carbon haven effect? Evidence from carbon-intensive industries in China. *Energy Economics*, 86, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec...> <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec...>.
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top