ORIGINAL RESEARCH
The Environmental Status Assessment Model
of Artificial Wetlands Based
on Big Data Technology
More details
Hide details
1
School of Automobile Business, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shiyan, 442002, China
2
School of Physical Education, Hanjiang Normal University, Shiyan, 442002, China
Submission date: 2024-10-31
Final revision date: 2025-02-12
Acceptance date: 2025-03-04
Online publication date: 2025-04-18
Publication date: 2026-04-21
Corresponding author
Na Zheng
School of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, 442002, Shiyan, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2026;35(2):2977-2993
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
With the strengthening of environmental protection awareness, constructed wetlands are
an important part of urban ecosystems, and their environmental status assessment is paid more
attention. This study aims to construct and validate a new model for the environmental state assessment
of constructed wetlands, which integrates the analytic hierarchy process and backpropagation
neural network to improve the accuracy and efficiency of assessment. This study collects a large
amount of wetland environmental data, uses the analytic hierarchy process to determine the weights
of key evaluation indicators, and then uses an improved backpropagation neural network to carry
out in-depth learning and prediction to accurately assess the environmental state of constructed
wetlands. An adaptive variation genetic algorithm was used to optimize the BP neural network model,
along with L1 and L2 regularization techniques and Adam and RMSprop optimization algorithms
were used to further improve the model performance. The results show that the model converges
at the 20th iteration, the convergence speed is increased by 34%, 80% of the data falls within the error
range of plus or minus 0.2, the R2 value is as high as 0.99163, and the mean square error is close to
zero, which shows that the model has significant advantages in improving the evaluation accuracy and
efficiency. The comprehensive score shows that the overall environmental status of the constructed
wetland is not ideal; there may be pollution problems, and improvement measures need to be taken.
This model provides a scientific basis for wetland environmental protection and management, helps
optimize protection measures, and realizes the sustainable development of wetland ecosystems.
It is also of great significance for improving the efficiency and effect of wetland management.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (32)
1.
DUMAX N., ROZAN A. Valuation of the environmental benefits induced by a constructed wetland. Wetlands Ecology and Management. 29 (6), 809, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273....
2.
HASSAN I., CHOWDHURY S.R., PRIHARTATO P.K., RAZZAK S.A. Wastewater treatment using constructed wetland: Current trends and future potential. Processes. 9 (11), 1917, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111....
3.
AMPOFO S., ISSIFU J.S., KUSIBU M.M., MOHAMMED A.S., ADIALI F. Selection of the final solid waste disposal site in the Bolgatanga municipality of Ghana using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-criteria evaluation (MCE). Heliyon. 9 (8), 1, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli... PMid:37576321 PMCid:PMC10413006.
4.
WUBALEM A., TESFAW G., DAWIT Z., GETAHUN B., MEKURIA T., JOTHIMANI M. Comparison of statistical and analytical hierarchy process methods on flood susceptibility mapping: In a case study of the lake Tana sub-basin in northwestern Ethiopia. Open Geosciences. 13 (1), 1668, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-20....
5.
ABBUSSUM R., DAR A.Q. Performance evaluation of artificial intelligence paradigms-artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for flood prediction. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28 (20), 25265, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:33453033.
6.
UNVER S., ERGENC I. Safety risk identification and prioritize of forest logging activities using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Alexandria Engineering Journal. 60 (1), 1591, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.....
7.
DAR T., RAI N., BHAT A. Delineation of potential groundwater recharge zones using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies. 5 (4), 292, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1080/247495....
9.
WANG L., BI X. Risk assessment of knowledge fusion in an innovation ecosystem based on a GA-BP neural network. Cognitive Systems Research. 66, 201, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogs....
10.
ZHANG Y.G., TANG J., LIAO R.P., ZHANG M.F., ZHANG Y., WANG X.M., Su Z.Y. Application of an enhanced BP neural network model with water cycle algorithm on landslide prediction. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 35 (1), 1273, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477....
11.
MOUSAVI Z., VARAHRAM S., ETTEFAGH M.M., SADEGHI M.H., RAZAVI S.N. Deep neural networks-based damage detection using vibration signals of finite element model and real intact state: An evaluation via a lab-scale offshore jacket structure. Structural Health Monitoring. 20 (1), 379, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1177/147592....
12.
ZENG L., DAI Y., ZHANG X., MAN Y., TAI Y., YANG Y., TAO R. Keystone species and niche differentiation promote microbial N, P, and COD removal in pilot scale constructed wetlands treating domestic sewage. Environmental Science & Technology. 55 (18), 12652, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.es... PMid:34478283.
13.
KUMAR S., AGARWAL A., VILLURI V.G.K., PASUPULETI S., KUMAR D., KAUSHAL D.R., GOSAIN A.K, SIVAKUMAR B. Constructed wetland management in urban catchments for mitigating floods. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 35, 2105, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477....
14.
PINNINTI R., KASI V., SALLANGI L.P., LANDA S.R., RATHINASAMY M., SANGAMREDDI C., DANDU RADHA P.R. Performance of Canna Indica based microscale vertical flow constructed wetland under tropical conditions for domestic wastewater treatment. International Journal of Phytoremediation. 24 (7), 684, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1080/152265... PMid:34428391.
15.
ABDELHAY A., ABUNASER S.G. Modeling and economic analysis of greywater treatment in rural areas in Jordan using a novel vertical-flow constructed wetland. Environmental Management. 67 (1), 477, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267... PMid:32856093.
16.
SAEED T, MIAH M.J., KHAN T. Intensified constructed wetlands for the treatment of municipal wastewater: Experimental investigation and kinetic modeling. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28 (1), 30908, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:33594561.
17.
SHUKLA R., GUPTA D., SINGH G., MISHRA V.K. Performance of horizontal flow constructed wetland for secondary treatment of domestic wastewater in a remote tribal area of Central India. Sustainable Environment Research. 31 (1), 1, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834....
18.
HUANG Y., LI T., JIN Y. Wetland water quality assessment of eco-engineered landscaping practices: a case study of constructed wetland parks in Hangzhou. Water Practice and Technology. 18 (11), 2561, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.20....
19.
SOUMYADEEP B., MANASWINI B. Advancement in constructed wetland microbial fuel cell process for wastewater treatment and electricity generation: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 31 (38), 50056, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:39102132.
20.
JEON M., GUERRA H.B., CHOI H., KIM L.H. Long-term monitoring of an urban stormwater infiltration trench in South Korea with assessment using the analytic hierarchy process. Water. 14 (21), 3529, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w14213....
21.
BAGHERI M., ZAITON IBRAHIM Z., MANSOR S., MANAF L.A., AKHIR M.F., TALAAT W.I.A.W., BEIRANVAND POUR A. Land-use suitability assessment using Delphi and analytical hierarchy process (D-AHP) hybrid model for coastal city management: Kuala Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 10 (9), 621, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10....
22.
LYU C., LIU R., LI X., SONG Y., GAO H. Degradation of dissolved organic matter in effluent of municipal wastewater plant by a combined tidal and subsurface flow constructed wetland. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 106 (1), 171, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.... PMid:34210433.
23.
ROSHANI S.H., RAHAMAN M.H., REHMAN S., MASROOR M., AHMED R. Assessing forest health using remote sensing-based indicators and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in Valmiki Tiger Reserve, India. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 20 (8), 8579, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762....
25.
COBOS-MORA S.L., GUAMÁN-AUCAPIÑA J., ZÚÑIGA-RUIZ J. Suitable site selection for transfer stations in a solid waste management system using analytical hierarchy process as a multi-criteria decision analysis: A case study in Azuay-Ecuador. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 25 (2), 1944, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668....
26.
AL-HANBALI A., SHIBUTA K., ALSAAIDEH B., TAWARA Y. Analysis of the land suitability for paddy fields in Tanzania using a GIS-based analytical hierarchy process. Geo-spatial Information Science. 25 (2), 212, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1080/100950....
27.
DING H., WANG J., LIAO W., LIANG T., DAI H. Site selection of self-driving and recreational vehicle camps in China: An investigation using analytic hierarchy process and entropy. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition). 8 (5), 762, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte....
28.
SULIMAN M., ALI M. Identification of potential groundwater recharge sites in a semi-arid region of Pakistan using saaty's analytical hierarchical process (AHP). Geomatics and Environmental Engineering. 16 (1), 53, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.7494/geom.2....
29.
FATAHI NAFCHI R., YAGHOOBI P., REAISI VANANI H., OSTAD‑ALI‑ASKARI K., NOURI J., MAGHSOUDLOU B. Eco-hydrologic stability zonation of dams and power plants using the combined models of SMCE and CEQUALW2. Applied Water Science. 11 (7), 109, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201....
30.
TSENG P.H., YIP T.L. An evaluation model of cruise ports using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Maritime Business Review. 6 (1), 22, 2021.
31.
MA Z., GUO X. Ecological environment value assessment and ecological civilization in the Changjiang River basin. Water and Environment Journal. 38 (1), 178, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12....
32.
CHOUDHURI S., ADENIYE S., SEN A. Distribution alignment using complement entropy objective and adaptive consensus-based label refinement for partial domain adaptation. Artificial Intelligence and Applications. 1 (1), 43, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.47852/bonvi....
CITATIONS (1):
1.
Big Data Processing Methods in GIS
Irada Seyidova, Elgun Gamzaev
Land and Architecture