ORIGINAL RESEARCH
AHP-Based Analysis of Urban Park
Ecosystem Services: Linking Recreational
Adaptation to Environmental Sustainability
in Xinyang’s Yangshan Park
More details
Hide details
1
School of Forestry, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang464000, China
2
Personnel Section, Xinyang city south Bay Forest Farm, Xinyang 464000, China
3
Meteorological Station, Xinyang Meteorological Bureau, Xinyang 464000, China
4
Students’ Affairs office, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang464000, China
Submission date: 2025-02-08
Final revision date: 2025-05-29
Acceptance date: 2025-06-15
Online publication date: 2025-09-22
Corresponding author
Biyang Zhang
School of Forestry, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang464000, China
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
[Objective] This study aims to establish a scientific and rational evaluation system for assessing
the ecological recreation adaptability of urban parks, thereby providing a solid foundation for
the planning, design, and application of ecological recreation systems within these parks.
[Methods] The study employed the GST (Gray System Theory) method and the AHP (Analytic
Hierarchy Process) method to select and compute the evaluation indices for the ecological recreation
adaptability of urban parks. Internal tourists were chosen as the study subjects, and questionnaires were
randomly distributed to score each index element in the evaluation. [Results] (1) Through gray screening,
15 subjective and objective indicators were determined, including the distribution density of
recreational resources, species richness, etc. Six indicators (recreational resources grade, rainfall, air
quality, health quality, population density, and the proportion of tertiary industry) were excluded due
to their lack of direct relevance to evaluating ecological recreation suitability or their low scalability.
(2) The weight ranking of the criterion layer shows that the ecological environment carrying capacity
(0.5762) is the most important, indicating that in the evaluation of the ecological recreation adaptability
of parks, the ecological environment status is a key consideration factor; ecological recreation behavior
(0.2152) and ecological recreation resources (0.1614) follow next. The social and economic conditions
(0.0472) have a relatively lower weight. (3) Within each index layer, the highest importance was assigned
to the distribution density of recreational resources C1 (0.6334), the species richness C6 (0.4173) of
ecological environment carrying capacity B2, the recreational space layout C11 (0.7134) of ecological
recreation behavior B3, and the traffic accessibility C12 (0.5534) of the social and economic conditions B4. (4) The comprehensive score for the ecological recreation adaptability evaluation of Yangshan Park
was 3.924 points, categorizing it as “good”. The ecological recreation resources were rated as good,
with a comprehensive score of 3.5431 points. The ecological environment carrying capacity was rated
excellent, achieving the highest score among the four dimensions at 4.2364 points. The ecological
recreation behavior was rated as good, with a comprehensive score of 3.8563. Socio-economic conditions
were also rated as good, with a combined score of 3.2695. [Conclusion] The ecological recreation
adaptability of Yangshan Park is generally at a good level, reflecting the characteristics of ecological
recreation adaptability in current urban parks to a considerable extent.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (14)
1.
ZHANG Y.N., CHEN F. Study on the suitability evaluation of recreation in urban comprehensive parks-Take Zhongshan Park in Qingdao as an example. Civic Architecture, 20 (04), 102, 2023.
2.
WANG Z.P., WANG W., XING S.Y. Study on the relationship between urban park green space characteristics and use mode and population health. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 45 (05), 223, 2021.
3.
ZHANG Q., QIU F.M, XU D.M. Evaluation of ecological recreation suitability in Baishan Motherland Home Park based on GIS. Journal of Lishui College, 46 (04), 72, 2024.
4.
WANG F.Y., WANG K.Y., YU H. The spatial differentiation characteristics and correlation factors of ecological recreation in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration. Geographic Research, 39 (09), 2148, 2020.
5.
ZHU M.Y., HUA H.L., SUN Q.Y. The rational layout of urban ecological recreation space from the perspective of spatial justice - Take the main city of Qilin District, Qujing City, Yunnan Province as an example. Journal of Qujing Normal University, 42 (06), 83, 2023.
6.
ZHANG C., ZHANG H.F., WU J.Z. Evaluation of the carrying capacity of ecological recreation resources in Nanling National Park. Environmental Ecology, 5 (11), 53, 2023.
7.
WOZNIAK E., KULCZYK S., DEREK M. From intrinsicto service potential: an approach to assess tourism land.scape potential. Landscape and Urban Planning, 170 (2), 209, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
8.
WANG Z.J. Study on the planning and design of Xinyang Yangshan Park. Henan Agricultural University, 2017.
9.
HAN X., SUN T., CAO T. Study on landscape quality assessment of urban forest parks: Take Nanjing Zijinshan National Forest Park as an example. Ecological Indicators, 120, 106902, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
10.
ZHU S., JIANG W.A. Comprehensive evaluation of environmental quality for health ecotourism in Huangshan National Forest Park. Mobile Information Systems, 1, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8....
11.
WANG K., WANG Z., DENG J., FENG Y., LI Q. Study on the evaluation of emergency management capacity of resilient communities by the AHP-TOPSIS method. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (23), 16201, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
12.
WANG Z., LI, M., ZHANG X., SONG L., MO D.L. the scenic beauty of autumnal tree color at the landscape scale: A case study of Purple Mountain, Nanjing, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 47, 126526, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug....
13.
QI J., ZHANG Y., ZHANG J., CHEN Y., WU C., DUAN C., PAN Z. Research on the evaluation of geological environment carrying capacity based on the AHP-CRITIC Empowerment Method. Land, 11 (8), 1196, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land11....
14.
YANG T., WANG X. Evaluation of the plant landscape suitability in mountain parks based on principal component analysis: A case study of Guiyang City. Agronomy Journal, 113 (2), 760, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.2....