ORIGINAL RESEARCH
An Investigation on Measuring Carbon Emission Efficiency and Its Influencing Elements in the Yangtze River Economic Belt – Based on the SBM-Malmquist-Tobit Model
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Nanjing University of Finance & Economics Hongshan College, China
 
 
Submission date: 2024-07-26
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-09-26
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-11-10
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-01-27
 
 
Publication date: 2026-01-29
 
 
Corresponding author
Weiran Liu   

Nanjing University of Finance & Economics Hongshan College, No. 66 Luming Road, Gaochun District, 211314, Nanjing, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2026;35(1):209-218
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
First, this paper adopts the SBM-Malmquist model, which includes undesired output indicators, to examine the carbon emission efficiency of 11 provinces and municipalities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2004 to 2021 in both a static and dynamic way. Subsequently, this paper utilizes the Tobit regression model to investigate the variables that impact carbon emission efficiency. The empirical results indicate that: (1) Although the data indicates a gradual rise in the carbon emission efficiency of the provinces and municipalities within the Yangtze River Economic Belt, the total level of carbon emission efficiency remains relatively low. (2) Urbanization level and technological progress contribute significantly to carbon efficiency, while two factors, the opening-up level and energy structure, reduce it.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
LI R., JIN W. The role of the Yangtze River Protection Law in the emergence of adaptive water governance in China. Ecology and Society, 28 (1), 280132, 2023. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-136....
 
2.
KAYA Y., YOKOBORI K. Environment, energy, and economy: strategies for sustainability. United Nations University Press, 1997.
 
3.
SHENG P., LI J., ZHAI M., HUANG S. Coupling of economic growth and reduction in carbon emissions at the efficiency level: Evidence from China. Energy, 213, 118747, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener....
 
4.
TRINKS A., MULDER M., SCHOLTENS B. An efficiency perspective on carbon emissions and financial performance. Ecological Economics, 175, 106632, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
5.
FARRELL M.J. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120 (3), 253, 1957. https://doi.org/10.2307/234310....
 
6.
IFTIKHAR Y., HE W., WANG Z. Energy and CO2 emissions efficiency of major economies: A nonparametric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 779, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
7.
LI W.W., WANG W.P., WANG Y., ALI M. Historical growth in total factor carbon productivity of the Chinese industry - A comprehensive analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 471, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
8.
LI Y., CUI Q. Carbon neutral growth from 2020 strategy and airline environmental inefficiency: A network range-adjusted environmental data envelopment analysis. Applied Energy, 199, 13, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apen....
 
9.
LI X.S., SHU Y.X., JIN X. Environmental regulation, carbon emissions and green total factor productivity: a case study of China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24 (2), 2577, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668....
 
10.
LUCIO C., SONIA V., ANTONIO P., MASSIMO C. Environmental efficiency analysis and estimation of CO2 abatement costs in dairy cattle farms in Umbria (Italy): A SBM-DEA model with undesirable output. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 895, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
11.
LI T.X., BALEZENTIS T., MAKUTENIENE D., STREIMIKIENE D., KRISCIUKAITIENE I. Energy-related CO2 emission in European Union agriculture: Driving forces and possibilities for reduction. Applied Energy, 180, 682, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apen....
 
12.
BALEENTIS T., DABKIEN V., TREIMIKIEN D. Eco-efficiency and shadow price of greenhouse gas emissions in Lithuanian dairy farms: An application of the slacks-based measure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 356, 131875, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
13.
CHU J.F., WU J., SONG M.L. An SBM-DEA model with parallel computing design for environmental efficiency evaluation in the big data context: a transportation system application. Annals of Operations Research, 270 (1), 105, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479....
 
14.
KUANG B., LU X., ZHOU M., CHEN D. Provincial cultivated land use efficiency in China: Empirical analysis based on the SBM-DEA model with carbon emissions considered. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119874, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
15.
WANG Y., XIE L., ZHANG Y., WANG C., YU K. Does FDI promote or inhibit the high-quality development of agriculture in China? An agricultural GTFP perspective. Sustainability, 11 (17), 4620, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1117... PMCid:PMC10361532.
 
16.
ZHU Y.Y., ZHANG Y., PIAO H.L. Does agricultural mechanization improve the green total factor productivity of China's planting industry? Energies, 15 (3), 940, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1503....
 
17.
NIU H.T., VATSA P., MA W.L., LI J. Environmental regulation and energy efficiency: empirical evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China. Energy Efficiency, 16 (6), 61, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053....
 
18.
BOAMAH K.B., DU J.G., BOAMAH A.J., APPIAH K. A study on the causal effect of urban population growth and international trade on environmental pollution: evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25 (6), 5862, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:29235027.
 
19.
ZHENG L., NA M. A pollution paradox? The political economy of environmental inspection and air pollution in China. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101773, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss....
 
20.
LI J.B.A., HUANG X.J., CHUAI X.W., YANG H. The impact of land urbanization on carbon dioxide emissions in the Yangtze River Delta, China: A multiscale perspective. Cities, 116, 103275, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.citi....
 
21.
PAN X., WANG M. Does marine ecological compensation policy have improved marine carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from coastal areas in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31 (29), 41502, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:37639100.
 
22.
QIN Q.D., LIU Y., LI X., LI H.A. A multi-criteria decision analysis model for carbon emission quota allocation in China's east coastal areas: Efficiency and equity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 410, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
23.
ZHU B., ZHANG T.L. The impact of cross-region industrial structure optimization on economy, carbon emissions and energy consumption: A case of the Yangtze River Delta. Science of the Total Environment, 778, 146089, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:34030353.
 
24.
RAY S., DESLI E., REVIEW A.E., DUFLO E. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries: Comment. American Economic Review, 87 (5), 1033, 1997.
 
25.
CHUNG Y.H., FÄRE R., GROSSKOPF S. Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51 (3), 229, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1....
 
26.
GOLDSMITH R.W. A perpetual inventory of national wealth. Studies in Income and Wealth, NBER Chapters, Volume 14, 1951.
 
27.
ZHANG J., WU G.Y., ZHANG P.J. The estimation of China's provincial capital stock: 1952-2000. Economic Research Journal, 10 (1), 35, 2003.
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top