ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Analysis and Performance Evaluation
of Decoupling Relationship between Carbon
Emissions and Economic Development
in Chinese Agriculture
More details
Hide details
1
Jiangmen Polytechnic, College of Economics and management, Jiangmen, 529000, China
2
Guangdong Jiangmen Chinese medicine College, College of Marxism, Jiangmen, 529000, China
Submission date: 2024-04-21
Final revision date: 2024-06-18
Acceptance date: 2024-06-30
Online publication date: 2024-10-28
Publication date: 2025-07-05
Corresponding author
Bo He
Jiangmen Polytechnic, College of Economics and management, Jiangmen, 529000, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(5):5123-5133
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This paper addresses temporal characteristics, decoupling relationships, and performance evaluation
concerning agricultural carbon emissions in China, providing a basis for achieving the “dual carbon”
goals and strengthening the construction of an agricultural powerhouse. A comprehensive index
system for agricultural carbon emissions and their performance evaluation is constructed. Based on
the systematic measurement index of provincial agricultural carbon emissions in China from 2007
to 2020, the Tapio model is employed to investigate the decoupling relationship between agricultural
carbon emissions and economic growth. Additionally, a super-efficiency SBM model is constructed
to report the performance and decomposition efficiency of agricultural carbon emissions in China.
The results indicate that, from 2007 to 2020, the overall trend of agricultural carbon emissions in China
follows an inverted “U-shaped” curve, with significant regional disparities and stable grade distribution.
The decoupling relationship between agricultural carbon emissions and agricultural economic
development in China has shifted from weak decoupling to strong decoupling, divided into two
stages: a steady period (2007-2016) and a breakthrough period (2017-2020). The performance
of agricultural carbon emissions shows a trend of “rapid increase-slow decrease-steady improvement,”
with agricultural production technology change (TC) contributing more prominently than technical
efficiency change (EC). It is concluded that since 2017, China’s agricultural carbon emissions have
shown an overall downward trend, and agricultural economic development has gradually reduced
its reliance on agricultural carbon emissions.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (32)
1.
KALIMUTHU T., KALPANA P., KUPPUSAMY S., RAJA SREEDHARAN V. Intelligent decision-making framework for agriculture supply chain in emerging economies: Research opportunities and challenges. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 219, 108766, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
2.
LIU J., FANG Y., WANG G., LIU B., WANG R. The aging of farmers and its challenges for labor-intensive agriculture in China: A perspective on farmland transfer plans for farmers' retirement. Journal of Rural Studies. 100, 103013, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrur....
3.
GAO C., SUN B., ZHANG T.-L. Sustainable Nutrient Management in Chinese Agriculture: Challenges and Perspective1 1Project supported by the Knowledge Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Nos. KZCX3-SW-417 and KZCX2-413). Pedosphere. 16 (2), 253, 2006.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-....
5.
ZHOU H., TAO F., CHEN Y., YIN L., WANG Y., LI Y., ZHANG S. Climate change reduces agricultural total factor productivity in major agricultural production areas of China even with continuously increasing agricultural inputs. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 349, 109953, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrf....
6.
SHAH W.U.H., LU Y., LIU J., REHMAN A., YASMEEN R. The impact of climate change and production technology heterogeneity on China's agricultural total factor productivity and production efficiency. Science of The Total Environment. 907, 168027, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:37898215.
7.
ZHANG L., CAI C., SINGH K., ZHONG K. Green technology innovation, trade deficit and carbon emission transfer in agriculture under the new "dual circulation" development pattern of China. Ecological Indicators. 159, 111757, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
8.
ZHAO L., RAO X., LIN Q. Study of the impact of digitization on the carbon emission intensity of agricultural production in China. Science of The Total Environment. 903, 166544, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:37678528.
9.
WEI Z., WEI K., LIU J., ZHOU Y. The relationship between agricultural and animal husbandry economic development and carbon emissions in Henan Province, the analysis of factors affecting carbon emissions, and carbon emissions prediction. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 193, 115134, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marp... PMid:37379632.
10.
WANG H., QIU T. The effects of farmer cooperatives on agricultural carbon emissions reduction: Evidence from rural China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 450, 141881, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
11.
JI M., LI J., ZHANG M. What drives the agricultural carbon emissions for low-carbon transition? Evidence from China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 105, 107440, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
12.
SHABBIR ALAM M., DURAISAMY P., BAKKAR SIDDIK A., MURSHED M., MAHMOOD H., PALANISAMY M., KIRIKKALELI D. The impacts of globalization, renewable energy, and agriculture on CO2 emissions in India: Contextual evidence using a novel composite carbon emission-related atmospheric quality index. Gondwana Research. 119, 384, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2....
13.
WEST T.O., MARLAND G. A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 91 (1), 217, 2002.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-....
14.
SU L., WANG Y., YU F. Analysis of regional differences and spatial spillover effects of agricultural carbon emissions in China. Heliyon. 9 (6), e16752, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli... PMid:37303571 PMCid:PMC10250807.
17.
HE P., ZHANG J., LI W. The role of agricultural green production technologies in improving low-carbon efficiency in China: Necessary but not effective. Journal of Environmental Management. 293, 112837, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:34102495.
18.
SHESTALOVA V. Sequential Malmquist Indices of Productivity Growth: An Application to OECD Industrial Activities. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 19 (2), 211, 2003.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022....
20.
SHI R., YAO L., ZHAO M., YAN Z. Low-carbon production performance of agricultural green technological innovation: From multiple innovation subject perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 105, 107424, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
21.
GUO Z., ZHANG X. Carbon reduction effect of agricultural green production technology: A new evidence from China. Science of The Total Environment. 874, 162483, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:36858221.
22.
FU J., DING R., ZHU Y.-Q., DU L.-Y., SHEN S.-W., PENG L.-N., ZOU J., HONG Y.-X., LIANG J., WANG K.-X., XIAO W.-Q. Analysis of the spatial-temporal evolution of Green and low carbon utilization efficiency of agricultural land in China and its influencing factors under the goal of carbon neutralization. Environmental Research. 237, 116881, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envr... PMid:37595829.
23.
YANG L., GUAN Z., CHEN S., HE Z. Re-measurement and influencing factors of agricultural eco-efficiency under the 'dual carbon' target in China. Heliyon. 10 (3), e24944, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli... PMid:38318057 PMCid:PMC10839593.
24.
JU H., ZENG G., ZHANG S. Inter-provincial flow and influencing factors of agricultural carbon footprint in China and its policy implication. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 105, 107419, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
25.
DENG Y., LIU J.-Y., XIE W., LIU X., LV J., ZHANG R., WU W., GENG Y., BOULANGE J. Impact of carbon pricing on mitigation potential in Chinese agriculture: A model-based multi-scenario analysis at provincial scale. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 105, 107409, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
26.
WANG W., CHEN Y., PEI X. Can agricultural trade openness facilitate agricultural carbon reduction? Evidence from Chinese provincial data. Journal of Cleaner Production. 441, 140877, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
27.
LI H., JIN X., SHAN W., HAN B., ZHOU Y., TITTONELL P. Optimizing agricultural management in China for soil greenhouse gas emissions and yield balance: A regional heterogeneity perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production. 452, 142255, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
28.
ZHANG Z., SHARIFI A. Analysis of decoupling between CO2 emissions and economic growth in China's provincial capital cities: A Tapio model approach. Urban Climate. 55, 101885, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucli....
29.
TAO M., WEN L., SHENG M.S., YAN Z.J., POLETTI S. Dynamics between energy intensity and carbon emissions: What does the clustering effect of labor and capital play? Journal of Cleaner Production. 452, 142223, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
30.
WANG Y., WANG W., CHEN Y., WU L. Projection of ecological water consumption under carbon emission in Chinese provinces. Journal of Cleaner Production. 448, 141630, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
31.
MORENO J.C., BERENGUEL M., DONAIRE J.G., RODRíGUEZ F., SÁNCHEZ-MOLINA J.A., GUZMÁN J.L., GIAGNOCAVO C.L. A pending task for the digitalisation of agriculture: A general framework for technologies classification in agriculture. Agricultural Systems. 213, 103794, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy....
32.
SHAH W.U.H., HAO G., YASMEEN R., YAN H., SHEN J., LU Y. Role of China's agricultural water policy reforms and production technology heterogeneity on agriculture water usage efficiency and total factor productivity change. Agricultural Water Management. 287, 108429, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwa....