ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Comparative Analyses of Carbon Footprints and Economic Benefits: Rice-Shrimp Co-Cropping, Rice-Crab Co-Cropping and Rice Monoculture Models
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Plant Protection, Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161, China
 
 
Submission date: 2023-08-19
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-09-18
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-10-01
 
 
Online publication date: 2023-11-27
 
 
Publication date: 2024-01-22
 
 
Corresponding author
Fengquan Yu   

Institute of Plant Protection, Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2024;33(2):1413-1419
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
An objective and complete assessment of the carbon footprint of rice-fishery co-cropping model is critical for the rice-farming industry’s low-carbon and green growth. Based on field experiments and the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, a comprehensive carbon footprint assessment of rice monoculture, rice-shrimp co-cropping, and rice-crab co-cropping models was conducted in this study, and the NEEB of different rice farming models was calculated based on the economic benefits. The carbon footprints per unit area of rice monoculture, rice-shrimp co-cropping, and rice-crab co-cropping models were 14122.65 kg (CO2-eq)·hm-2, 13791.78 kg (CO2-eq)·hm-2, and 15617.13 kg (CO2-eq)·hm-2, respectively, according to the data. Hotspot analysis revealed that the carbon footprint composition of the rice-shrimp and rice-crab co-cropping models was influenced more by CH4 emissions, energy use, and feed inputs. Due to the greater economic production values of rice-shrimp and rice-crab co-cropping modes, the NEEB of these two modes increased by 81.45% and 69.52%, respectively, as compared to rice monoculture. Overall, rice-shrimp and rice-crab co-cropping models can reduce emissions and improve paddy field efficiency to some extent when compared to rice monoculture and rice-crab co-cropping models, but attention should be paid to the point of trade-off between carbon footprints and economic benefits in order to promote the green and efficient development of the rice-fishery co-cropping model. The technique utilized in this work can give technical assistance for a more thorough carbon footprint assessment of multifunctional agricultural production systems.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
 
CITATIONS (5):
1.
Research on optimization of waste sorting and transportation network in smart cities based on garbage volume prediction
Jiaxin Cui, Yan Yan, Lina Jiang, Lu Zhang, Wei Xu
Discover Computing
 
2.
Impacts of Long-Term Positional Application of the Rice-Crab Model on the Field Environment
Mei Yang, Lingyun Shao, Yao Chi, Jin Chu, Hai Dong, Fengquan Yu
Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
 
3.
Technical Efficiency, Economic Sustainability, and Environmental Implications of Dairy Farms in Pakistan
Amar Razzaq, Shengze Qin, Mumtaz Anwar, Yewang Zhou
Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
 
4.
Frog Density and Growth Stage of Rice Impact Paddy Field and Gut Microbial Communities in Rice–Frog Co-Cropping Models
Zhangyan Zhu, Ran Li, Yunshuang Ma, Anran Yu, Rongquan Zheng
Microorganisms
 
5.
Straw Biochar Production and Carbon Emission Reduction Potential in the Yangtze River Economic Belt Region
Meiqi Shao
Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top