ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Comparative Analyses of Carbon Footprints
and Economic Benefits: Rice-Shrimp Co-Cropping,
Rice-Crab Co-Cropping and Rice
Monoculture Models
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Plant Protection, Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161, China
Submission date: 2023-08-19
Final revision date: 2023-09-18
Acceptance date: 2023-10-01
Online publication date: 2023-11-27
Publication date: 2024-01-22
Corresponding author
Fengquan Yu
Institute of Plant Protection, Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2024;33(2):1413-1419
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
An objective and complete assessment of the carbon footprint of rice-fishery co-cropping model
is critical for the rice-farming industry’s low-carbon and green growth. Based on field experiments
and the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, a comprehensive carbon footprint assessment of
rice monoculture, rice-shrimp co-cropping, and rice-crab co-cropping models was conducted in this
study, and the NEEB of different rice farming models was calculated based on the economic benefits.
The carbon footprints per unit area of rice monoculture, rice-shrimp co-cropping, and rice-crab
co-cropping models were 14122.65 kg (CO2-eq)·hm-2, 13791.78 kg (CO2-eq)·hm-2, and 15617.13 kg
(CO2-eq)·hm-2, respectively, according to the data. Hotspot analysis revealed that the carbon footprint
composition of the rice-shrimp and rice-crab co-cropping models was influenced more by CH4
emissions, energy use, and feed inputs. Due to the greater economic production values of rice-shrimp
and rice-crab co-cropping modes, the NEEB of these two modes increased by 81.45% and 69.52%,
respectively, as compared to rice monoculture. Overall, rice-shrimp and rice-crab co-cropping models
can reduce emissions and improve paddy field efficiency to some extent when compared to rice
monoculture and rice-crab co-cropping models, but attention should be paid to the point of trade-off
between carbon footprints and economic benefits in order to promote the green and efficient development
of the rice-fishery co-cropping model. The technique utilized in this work can give technical assistance
for a more thorough carbon footprint assessment of multifunctional agricultural production systems.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
CITATIONS (5):
1.
Research on optimization of waste sorting and transportation network in smart cities based on garbage volume prediction
Jiaxin Cui, Yan Yan, Lina Jiang, Lu Zhang, Wei Xu
Discover Computing
2.
Impacts of Long-Term Positional Application
of the Rice-Crab Model on the Field Environment
Mei Yang, Lingyun Shao, Yao Chi, Jin Chu, Hai Dong, Fengquan Yu
Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
3.
Technical Efficiency, Economic Sustainability,
and Environmental Implications
of Dairy Farms in Pakistan
Amar Razzaq, Shengze Qin, Mumtaz Anwar, Yewang Zhou
Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
4.
Frog Density and Growth Stage of Rice Impact Paddy Field and Gut Microbial Communities in Rice–Frog Co-Cropping Models
Zhangyan Zhu, Ran Li, Yunshuang Ma, Anran Yu, Rongquan Zheng
Microorganisms
5.
Straw Biochar Production and Carbon Emission
Reduction Potential in the Yangtze
River Economic Belt Region
Meiqi Shao
Polish Journal of Environmental Studies