ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Do Environmental Information Disclosure Discourage Foreign Direct Investment? Empirical from China
Ye Luo 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Business School, Sias University, Zhengzhou
 
 
Submission date: 2024-05-11
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-06-17
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-07-22
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-11-05
 
 
Publication date: 2025-07-22
 
 
Corresponding author
Ye Luo   

Business School, Sias University, Zhengzhou
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(5):5727-5740
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
As a cutting-edge topic within the realm of international investment, deciphering the influence of informational factors on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is of paramount importance. Due to the difficulty of capturing, identifying, and endogenizing, the “information” factor makes it particularly difficult to draw causal inferences between them. However, the environmental information disclosure policy enacted by China in 2007 has presented a unique opportunity and a natural exogenous variable for examining the influence of local environmental information announcements on the inflow of FDI. This study selects the panel data of prefecture-level cities in China from 2004 to 2021 and, constructs a quasi-natural experiment with the environmental information disclosure approach introduced in 2007. Those cities that disclose environmental information are referred to as the treatment group, while those that do not disclose such information are referred to as the control group. Using propensity score matching (PSM) to match the sample cities and exclude those with large differences, and then choosing difference-in-differences (DID) analysis to explore the net effect of environmental information disclosure on regional FDI. The findings indicate that environmental information disclosure significantly decreases regional FDI inflows, and the policy is not effective until a significant amount of time has passed. The estimation results of the balance trend test, replace the matching method test and, the counterfactual test, and the exclusion of similar policy shocks and verifies the robustness of the empirical findings. In further analysis, it is revealed that environmental information disclosure impacts FDI differently depending on city geographic location, city tiers, and environmental regulation intensity.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (43)
1.
ZENG S., ZHOU Y. Foreign direct investment's impact on China's economic growth, technological innovation and pollution. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (6), 2839, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid:33802232 PMCid:PMC7999935.
 
2.
DHAYAL K.S., AGRAWAL S., AGRAWAL R., KUMAR A., GIRI A.K. Green energy innovation initiatives for environmental sustainability: current state and future research directions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:38656717.
 
3.
DHAYAL K.S., GIRI A.K., ESPOSITO L., AGRAWAL S. Mapping the significance of green venture capital for sustainable development: a systematic review and future research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 396, 136489, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
4.
ONWE J.C., UCHE E., DHAYAL K.S., UWAZIE I.U., ASHIBOGWU K.N. Advocating green economy in India: the tug of war among income inequality, export diversification, and environmental quality. Sustainable Development, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.292....
 
5.
DHAYAL K.S., GIRI A.K., KUMAR A., SAMADHIYA A., AGRAWAL S., AGRAWAL R. Can green finance facilitate industry 5.0 transition to achieve sustainability? A systematic review with future research directions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30 (46), 102158, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:37695480.
 
6.
WALTER I., UGELOW J.L. Environmental policies in developing countries. Ambio, 102, 1979.
 
7.
ALFARO L., CHANDA A., KALEMLI-OZCAN S., SAYEK S. FDI and economic growth: the role of local financial markets. Journal of International Economics, 64 (1), 89, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-....
 
8.
BLONIGEN B.A. Firm-specific assets and the link between exchange rates and foreign direct investment. The American Economic Review, 447, 1997.
 
9.
HAUFLER A., WOOTON I. Country size and tax competition for foreign direct investment. Journal of Public Economics, 71 (1), 121, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-....
 
10.
HEAD K., RIES J. Inter-city competition for foreign investment: static and dynamic effects of China's incentive areas. Journal of Urban Economics, 40 (1), 38, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1....
 
11.
GLASS A.J., SAGGI K. Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Economics, 56 (2), 387, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-....
 
12.
CHENG L.K., KWAN Y.K. What are the determinants of the location of foreign direct investment? The Chinese experience. Journal of International Economics, 51 (2), 379, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-....
 
13.
HEAD K., MAYER T. Market potential and the location of Japanese investment in the European Union. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86 (4), 959, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465....
 
14.
GREENAWAY D., KNELLER R. Firm heterogeneity, exporting and foreign direct investment. The Economic Journal, 117 (517), F134, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468....
 
15.
RIDZUAN A.R., DASH S.K., PORWAL A., DHAYAL K.S., ABD RAHMAN N.H., OMRAN M. The green effect: exploring the impact of innovation and foreign direct investment on environmental quality in Malaysia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13 (5), 54, 2023. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep....
 
16.
DEAN J.M., LOVELY M.E., WANG H. Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, 90 (1), 1, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdev....
 
17.
DOU J., HAN X. How does the industry mobility affect pollution industry transfer in China: empirical test on pollution haven hypothesis and porter hypothesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 105, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
18.
BECKER R.A., PASURKA JR C., SHADBEGIAN R.J. Do environmental regulations disproportionately affect small businesses? Evidence from the pollution abatement costs and expenditures survey. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66 (3), 523, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem....
 
19.
MULATU A. The structure of UK outbound FDI and environmental regulation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68, 65, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640....
 
20.
YANG X., WANG D. Heterogeneous environmental regulation, foreign direct investment, and regional carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from China. Sustainability, 14 (11), 6386, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1411....
 
21.
WANG S., WANG H., SUN Q. The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental pollution in China: corruption matters. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (18), 6477, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid:32899562 PMCid:PMC7559999.
 
22.
CHEN Z., PAUDEL K.P., ZHENG R. Pollution halo or pollution haven: assessing the role of foreign direct investment on energy conservation and emission reduction. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 65 (2), 311, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/096405....
 
23.
KHEDER S.B., ZUGRAVU N. Environmental regulation and French firms' location abroad: an economic geography model in an international comparative study. Ecological Economics, 77, 48, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
24.
REZZA A.A. FDI and pollution havens: evidence from the Norwegian manufacturing sector. Ecological Economics, 90, 140, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
25.
KIM Y., RHEE D. Do stringent environmental regulations attract foreign direct investment in developing countries? Evidence on the "race to the top" from cross-country panel data. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55 (12), 2796, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/154049....
 
26.
WANG H., DONG C., LIU Y. Beijing direct investment to its neighbors: a pollution haven or pollution halo effect? Journal of Cleaner Production, 239, 118062, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
27.
BAE M.G., WANG Y.C., LIU N. Revisiting the relationship between the strength of environmental regulation and foreign direct investment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 899918, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.... PMid:35645892 PMCid:PMC9134937.
 
28.
LI B., ALLEYNE A., ZHANG Z., MU Y. Sustainability and waste imports in China: pollution haven or resources hunting. Sustainability, 13 (2), 932, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1302....
 
29.
WU Q., WANG R. Do environmental regulation and foreign direct investment drive regional air pollution in China? Sustainability, 15 (2), 1567, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1502....
 
30.
CAI X., LU Y., WU M., YU L. Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Journal of Development Economics, 123, 73, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdev....
 
31.
GUAN Y., ZHAI Z., WANG Y., WU D., YU L., LEI Z. Foreign direct investment, environmental regulation, and haze pollution: empirical evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (18), 27571, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:34981383.
 
32.
GE Y., HU Y., REN S. Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: evidence from China's eleventh and twelfth five-year plans. Sustainability, 12 (6), 2528, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1206....
 
33.
REN S., LI L., HAN Y., HAO Y., WU H. The emerging driving force of inclusive green growth: does digital economy agglomeration work? Business Strategy and the Environment, 31 (4), 1656, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.29....
 
34.
YUAN S., PAN X. The effects of digital technology application and supply chain management on corporate circular economy: a dynamic capability view. Journal of Environmental Management, 341, 118082, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:37141715 PMCid:PMC10997068.
 
35.
SHROFF N., VERDI R.S., YU G. Information environment and the investment decisions of multinational corporations. The Accounting Review, 89 (2), 759, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-5....
 
36.
EARNHART D.H., KHANNA M., LYON T.P. Corporate environmental strategies in emerging economies. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/r....
 
37.
D'ASPREMONT C., FERREIRA R.D.S., GÉRARD-VARET L. On the dixit-stiglitz model of monopolistic competition. The American Economic Review, 623, 1996.
 
38.
WANG H., CHEN Z., WU X., NIE X. Can a carbon trading system promote the transformation of a low-carbon economy under the framework of the porter hypothesis? Empirical analysis based on the psm-did method. Energy Policy, 129, 930, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
 
39.
ZHANG S., YANG B., SUN C. Can payment vehicle influence public willingness to pay for environmental pollution control? Evidence from the cvm survey and psm method of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365, 132648, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
40.
ELLIOTT R.J., SUN P., CHEN S. Energy intensity and foreign direct investment: a Chinese city-level study. Energy Economics, 40, 484, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
41.
ZHENG D., SHI M. Multiple environmental policies and pollution haven hypothesis: evidence from China's polluting industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 295, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
42.
DENG X., HUANG B., ZHENG Q., REN X. Can environmental governance and corporate performance be balanced in the context of carbon neutrality? A quasi-natural experiment of central environmental inspections. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, 852286, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.....
 
43.
YOON H., HESHMATI A. Do environmental regulations affect FDI decisions? The pollution haven hypothesis revisited. Science and Public Policy, 48 (1), 122, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top