ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Does Improving Government Auditing Independence Promote Public Environmental Concern? Evidence from Auditing Vertical Management Reform in China
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Zhejiang, China
 
 
Submission date: 2024-06-03
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-09-06
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-10-28
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-01-22
 
 
Publication date: 2025-11-14
 
 
Corresponding author
Hairong Huang   

School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Zhejiang, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(6):8201-8211
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Audit organizations’ independence and supervision function may guide the public’s pro-environmental behavior. Based on panel data from 292 cities in China from 2011 to 2019, we explore the impact of Auditing Vertical Management Reform on public environmental concerns through a difference-in-differences method. The results indicate that Auditing Vertical Management Reform positively affects public environmental concerns in the short term. Auditing Vertical Management Reform enhances public environmental concern by improving government environmental enforcement and corporate environmental information disclosure. We further confirm that Auditing Vertical Management Reform and Public Interest Litigation Reform have a synergistic implementation effect for the long-term enhancement of public environmental concern. Auditing Vertical Management Reform’s impact on public environmental concern is more pronounced in cities with higher legal development and digitization or lower fiscal pressure. These findings complement the scant literature on the environmental effects of Auditing Vertical Management Reform, provide insights into the relationship between the independence of audit offices and public environmental awareness, and provide empirical evidence for other countries concerned with the management model of audit institutions.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (73)
1.
CUI J., HUANG S., WANG C. The impact of air quality on innovation activities in China. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 122, 102893, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem....
 
2.
YANG Y., ZHANG X., WU T. Does Public Participation Reduce Regional Carbon Emissions? A Quasi-Natural Experiment from Environmental Information Disclosure in China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 32 (2), 1899, 2023. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes... PMid:39874030.
 
3.
YU C., LONG H., ZHANG X., TAN Y., ZHOU Y., ZANG C., TU C.-Y. The interaction effect between public environmental concern and air pollution: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 391, 136231, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
4.
LIU X., JI X., ZHANG D., YANG J., WANG Y. How public environmental concern affects the sustainable development of Chinese cities: An empirical study using extended DEA models. Journal of Environmental Management. 251, 109619, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:31574374.
 
5.
LONG F., LIU J., ZHENG L. The Effects of Public Environmental Concern on Urban-Rural Environmental Inequality: Evidence from Chinese Industrial Enterprises. Sustainable Cities and Society. 80, 103787, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.....
 
6.
NEWIG J. Does public participation in environmental decisions lead to improved environmental quality? towards an analytical framework. Communication, Cooperation, Participation. 1 (1), 51, 2007.
 
7.
BERRY J., FISCHER G., GUITERAS R. Eliciting and Utilizing Willingness to Pay: Evidence from Field Trials in Northern Ghana. Journal of Political Economy. 128 (4), 1436, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1086/705374.
 
8.
ITO K., ZHANG S. Willingness to Pay for Clean Air: Evidence from Air Purifier Markets in China. Journal of Political Economy. 128 (5), 1627, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1086/705554.
 
9.
LIU X., MU R. Public environmental concern in China: Determinants and variations. Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions. 37, 116, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloe....
 
10.
WANG Y., MORGAN R.K., CASHMORE M. Environmental Impact Assessment of Projects in the People's Republic of China: New Law, Old Problems. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 23, 543, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-....
 
11.
GREENSTONE M., JACK B. Envirodevonomics: A Research Agenda for an Emerging Field. Journal of Economic Literature. 53 (1), 5, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.53....
 
12.
LI W., LIU J., LI D. Getting their voices heard: Three cases of public participation in environmental protection in China. Journal of Environmental Management. 98, 65, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:22245866.
 
13.
KULIN J., JOHANSSON SEVÄ I. Quality of government and the relationship between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: a cross-national study. Environmental Politics. 30 (5), 727, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/096440....
 
14.
SØNDERSKOV K.M. Environmental group membership, collective action and generalised trust. Environmental Politics. 17 (1), 78, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/096440....
 
15.
TAM K.P., CHAN H.W. Environmental Concern Has a Weaker Association with Pro-environmental Behavior in Some Societies than Others: A Cross-Cultural Psychology Perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 53, 213, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
 
16.
LIN B., ZHU J. Is the implementation of energy saving and emission reduction policy really effective in Chinese cities? A policy evaluation perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production. 220, 1111, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
17.
LIN Y., QIAN W., ZHANG X., YANG Y. The Impact of Auditing Centralization on Carbon Productivity: Evidence From China's Vertical Management Auditing Reform. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 33 (3), 2761, 2024. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes....
 
18.
CAO H., ZHANG L., QI Y., YANG Z., LI X. Government auditing and environmental governance: Evidence from China's auditing system reform. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 93, 106705, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
 
19.
APPUHAMI R., TASHAKOR S. The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on CSR Disclosure: An Analysis of Australian Firms. Australian Accounting Review. 27, 400, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.1....
 
20.
HAERIDISTIA N., FADJARENIE A. The effect of independence, professional ethics & auditor experience on audit quality. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research. 8 (2), 24, 2019.
 
21.
HOWLETT M., MUKHERJEE I. Policy Design and Non-Design: Towards a Spectrum of Policy Formulation Types. Politics and Governance. 2 (2), 57, 2014. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v....
 
22.
LI L., TAEIHAGH A. An In-Depth Analysis of the Evolution of the Policy Mix for the Sustainable Energy Transition in China from 1981 to 2020. Applied Energy. 263, 114611, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apen....
 
23.
ZHANG Q., YU Z., KONG D. The real effect of legal institutions: Environmental courts and firm environmental protection expenditure. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 98, 102254, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem....
 
24.
LU W., WU H., YANG S., TU Y. Effect of environmental regulation policy synergy on carbon emissions in China under consideration of the mediating role of industrial structure. Journal of Environmental Management. 322, 116053, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:36044823.
 
25.
QIA Y., ZHANG J., CHEN J. Tax incentives, environmental regulation and firms' emission reduction strategies: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 117, 102750, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem....
 
26.
ZHOU A., LI J. Impact of policy combinations on carbon emission performance: evidence from China. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 26 (9), 1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098....
 
27.
LI X., YAO X. Can energy supply-side and demand-side policies for energy saving and emission reduction be synergistic? - A simulated study on China's coal capacity cut and carbon tax. Energy Policy. 138, 111232, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
 
28.
VAN DEN BERGH J., CASTRO J., DREWS S., EXADAKTYLOS F., FORAMITTI J., KLEIN F., KONC T., SAVIN I. Designing an effective climate-policy mix: accounting for instrument synergy. Climate Policy. 21 (6), 745, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/146930....
 
29.
ZHA D., JIANG P., ZHANG C., XIA D., CAO Y. Positive synergy or negative synergy: An assessment of the carbon emission reduction effect of renewable energy policy mixes on China's power sector. Energy Policy. 183, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
 
30.
XIAO J.Z., YANG S., ZHANG X., FIRTH M. Institutional Arrangements and Government Audit Independence in China. Abacus. 52 (3), 532, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.1....
 
31.
ZHOU D. China's Environmental Vertical Management Reform: An Effective and Sustainable Way Forward or Trouble in Itself? Laws. 9, 25, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws90....
 
32.
JIANG Q., TAN Q. National environmental audit and improvement of regional energy efficiency from the perspective of institution and development differences. Energy. 217, 119337, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener....
 
33.
LIU J., NIE S., LIN T. Government auditing and urban energy efficiency in the context of the digital economy: Evidence from China's Auditing System reform. Energy. 296, 131100, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener....
 
34.
GAO Z., ZHAO Y., LI L., HAO Y. The environmental consequences of national Audit governance: An analysis based on county-level data in China. Journal of Environmental Management. 359, 120976, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:38678902.
 
35.
CAO H., LI M., LU Y., XU Y. The impact of strengthening government auditing supervision on fiscal sustainability: Evidence from China's auditing vertical management reform. Finance Research Letters. 47, 102825, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.....
 
36.
LIN X., CHEN S., CHENG X., WANG J. Local government audit and municipal debt risk: Evidence from audit reform in China. Finance Research Letters. 50, 103198, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.....
 
37.
LUBELL M.N., ZAHRAN S., VEDLITZ A. Collective Action and Citizen Responses to Global Warming. Political Behavior. 29, 391, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109....
 
38.
VANSLEMBROUCK I., VAN HUYLENBROECK G., VERBEKE W. Determinants of the Willingness of Belgian Farmers to Participate in Agri-environmental Measures. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 53 (3), 489, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477....
 
39.
ZHANG W., ZHANG Z. Public participation behavior in "Internet plus tree-planting" in China: A comparison between government-led and enterprise-led modes. Journal of Cleaner Production. 433, 139681, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
40.
AJZEN I. Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 32 (4), 665, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559....
 
41.
HAN C., TIAN X.-L. Less pollution under a more centralized environmental system: Evidence from vertical environmental reforms in China. Energy Economics. 112, 106121, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
42.
BONNER S.E., LEWIS B.L. Determinants of Auditor Expertise. Journal of Accounting Research. 28, 1, 1990. https://doi.org/10.2307/249124....
 
43.
DEFOND M.L., ZHANG J. A Review of Archival Auditing Research. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 58 (2), 275, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc....
 
44.
NELSON M.W., TAN H.T. Judgment and Decision Making Research in Auditing: A Task, Person, and Interpersonal Interaction Perspective. Ear and Hearing. 24, 41, 2005. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.20....
 
45.
NURDIONO N., GAMAYUNI R. The effect of internal auditor competency on internal audit quality and its implication on the accountability of local government. European Research Studies Journal. 21 (4), 426, 2018. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/....
 
46.
ZEYN E. The Effect of Internal Audit Quality on Financial Accountability Quality at Local Government. Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research. 4 (2), 2018. https://doi.org/10.20448/2002.....
 
47.
AGARWAL S., DING Y., KUANG W., ZHU X. Are environmental punishments good news or bad news? Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 120, 102847, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem....
 
48.
JAGGI B., ALLINI A., MACCHIONI R., ZAMPELLA A. Do investors find carbon information useful? Evidence from Italian firms. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 50, 1031, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156....
 
49.
AMELIA R.W., SUHARDJANTO D., PROBOHUDONO A.N., HONGGOWATI S. Environmental disclosures in mining companies: are there any stakeholder demands? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 1248, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1....
 
50.
YU W., JIN X. Does environmental information disclosure promote the awakening of public environmental awareness? Insights from Baidu keyword analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 375, 134072, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
51.
MALTBY J. Environmental audit: theory and practices. Managerial Auditing Journal. 10, 15, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1108/026869....
 
52.
XIE T., YUAN Y., ZHANG H. Information, awareness, and mental health: Evidence from air pollution disclosure in China. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 120, 102827, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem....
 
53.
LANGPAP C., SHIMSHACK J. Private citizen suits and public enforcement: Substitutes or complements? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 59, 235, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem....
 
54.
ZHAI T., CHANG Y.-C. Standing of Environmental Public-Interest Litigants in China: Evolution, Obstacles and Solutions. Journal of Environmental Law. 30 (3), 369, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eq....
 
55.
GUO G. China's Local Political Budget Cycles. American Journal of Political Science. 53 (3), 621, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540....
 
56.
KAY S., ZHAO B., SUI D.Z. Can Social Media Clear the Air? A Case Study of the Air Pollution Problem in Chinese Cities. The Professional Geographer. 67 (3), 351, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/003301....
 
57.
WANG J., JIA Y. Social media's influence on air quality improvement: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 298, 126769, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
58.
GUO M., KUAI Y., LIU X. Stock market response to environmental policies: Evidence from heavily polluting firms in China. Economic Modelling. 86, 306, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ....
 
59.
OUADGHIRI I.E., GUESMI K., PEILLEX J., ZIEGLER A. Public Attention to Environmental Issues and Stock Market Returns. Ecological Economics. 180, 106836, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
60.
TAO Y., WANG D., YE Y., WU H., ZHANG Y. The role of public environmental concern on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from search index of web users. Energy Economics. 126, 107041, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
61.
YANG X., DONG X., JIANG Q., LIU G. Factors Influencing Public Concern about Environmental Protection: An Analysis from China. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society. 2019, 1, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5....
 
62.
YANG Y., ZHANG J., LI Y. The effects of environmental information disclosure on stock price synchronicity in China. Heliyon. 9 (5), e16271, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli... PMid:37251833 PMCid:PMC10213183.
 
63.
MARWA M., SALHI B., JARBOUI A. Environmental Audit and Environmental Disclosure Quality. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business. 67 (1), 93, 2020. https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-....
 
64.
DE CHAISEMARTIN C., D'HAULTFOEUILLE X. Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. American Economic Review. 110 (9), 2964, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20....
 
65.
ABRAHAM S., SUN L. Estimating Dynamic Treatment Effects in Event Studies With Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. Journal of Econometrics. 225 (2), 175, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeco....
 
66.
CENGIZ D., DUBE A., LINDNER A., ZIPPERER B. The Effect of Minimum Wages on Low-Wage Jobs*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 134 (3), 1405, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qj....
 
67.
BAGINSKI S.P., HASSELL J., KIMBROUGH M.D. The Effect of Legal Environment on Voluntary Disclosure: Evidence from Management Earnings Forecasts Issued in U.S. and Canadian Markets. The Accounting Review. 77 (1), 25, 2002. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2....
 
68.
JIAO H., KOO C.K., CUI Y. Legal environment, government effectiveness and firms' innovation in China: Examining the moderating influence of government ownership. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 96, 15, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
69.
ZHANG L., YUE M., WANG S., WAN Y., QU L. Research on public participation in environmental litigation: empirical evidence in China. Environmental Research Communications. 5 (11), 2023. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7....
 
70.
FENG T., WU X., GUO J. Racing to the bottom or the top? Strategic interaction of environmental protection expenditure among prefecture-level cities in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 384, 135565, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
71.
ILIOPOULOS P., DE WITTE K. The expenditure composition and trade-offs in local government budgets. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 93, 101900, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps....
 
72.
ZHANG J., ZHANG H., GONG X. Government's environmental protection expenditure in China: The role of Internet penetration. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 93, 106706, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
 
73.
GRITSUK N., GAMULINSKAYA N.V., PETROVA E.V. The innovative approach to managing the product quality in the digital economy: intellectual accounting and audit. International Journal for Quality Research. 14 (2), 543, 2020. https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR1....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top