ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Evaluation of Carbon Reduction Effect
of the Low-Carbon Policy: Evidence
from 47 Low-Carbon Pilot Cities of China
More details
Hide details
1
School of Management, Anhui University, He Fei 230601, China
Submission date: 2024-05-11
Final revision date: 2024-06-12
Acceptance date: 2024-07-19
Online publication date: 2024-11-05
Publication date: 2025-07-05
Corresponding author
Zijun Wu
School of Management, Anhui University, He Fei 230601, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(5):5455-5466
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Based on panel data from 204 prefecture-level cities in China spanning from 2010 to 2019, this
study examines the low-carbon city pilot program as a quasi-natural experiment. The propensity score
matching-double difference model (PSM-DID) is utilized to analyze the effects of the low-carbon city
pilot policy on carbon emission intensity. The research findings found: Firstly, the low-carbon city pilot
policy has significantly reduced the intensity of urban carbon emissions. Secondly, the primary factors
contributing to the reduction in urban carbon emissions intensity due to the low-carbon city pilot policy
include adjustments in industrial structure, energy consumption control, and advancements in green
technology innovation. Thirdly, heterogeneity analysis indicates that the impacts of the low-carbon city
pilot policy differ across various regions. Resource cities, eastern cities, as well as cities in the southeast
and northwest regions, experience significant effects.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (31)
1.
WU Y., LIU P., HUANG L., GE Y., CHEN L. Heat transfer performance of supercritical CO2 in a vertical U-tube. Applied Thermal Engineering, 250 (1), 123505, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appl....
2.
KAO X., LIU Y., WANG W., WEN Q., ZHANG P. The pressure of coal consumption on China's carbon dioxide emissions: A spatial and temporal perspective. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 15 (8), 102188, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.....
3.
WANG L., ZHA S., ZHANG S., JIN J. Sulfonated Chitosan Gel Membrane with Confined Amine Carriers for Stable and Efficient Carbon Dioxide Capture. ChemSusChem, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.2... PMid:38596908.
4.
YUAN S., GE Y., SU P., CHENG H., WANG Z., YU F. Green technology for carbon dioxide utilization: Vermiculite based hydrotalcite for methane dry reforming. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 12 (2), 112308, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece....
5.
XIAO D., FAN J., WANG W., WANG J., HOU L. Innovation city and low-carbon future: a quasi-natural experiment from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30 (43), 98004, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:37603247.
6.
LU Y., GUO J., AHMAD M., ZHANG H. Can Sci-Tech Finance Pilot Policies Reduce Carbon Emissions? Evidence from 252 Cities in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 933162, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.....
7.
LI J., FANG L., CHEN S., MAO H. Can low-carbon pilot policy improve atmospheric environmental performance in China? A quasi-natural experiment approach. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 96, 106807, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
8.
YIN K., LIU L., GU H. Green paradox or forced emission reduction-the dual effects of environmental regulation on carbon emissions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 11058, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid:36078773 PMCid:PMC9518542.
10.
NIU S., LUO X., YANG T., LIN G., LI C. Does the Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy Improve the Urban Land Green Use Efficiency? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20, 2704, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid:36768070 PMCid:PMC9915865.
11.
WANG X., ZHANG X., SONG J. The analysis of solar energy investment, digital economy, and carbon emissions in China. Frontiers in Energy Research, 11, 1183857, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.....
12.
MCALISTER S., MORTON R.L., BARRATT A. Incorporating carbon into health care: adding carbon emissions to health technology assessments. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6 (12), e993, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-... PMid:36495894.
13.
HASEEB A., XIA E.J., SAUD S., AHMAD A., KHURSHID H. Does information and communication technologies improve environmental quality in the era of globalization? Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26 (9), 8594, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:30710332.
14.
CARROLL J., BRAZIL W., HOWARD M., DENNY E. Imperfect emissions information during flight choices and the role of CO2 labelling. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 165, 112508, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser....
15.
AMIN N., SONG H., ALI M. Role of information and communication technology, economic growth, financial development and renewable energy consumption towards the sustainable environment: Insights from ASEAN countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30 (38), 89381, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:37452245.
16.
BOEDEKER P. Propensity Score Methods and Difference-in-Differences with an Exogenous Time-Varying Confounder: Evaluation of Methods. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 16 (3), 377, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1080/193457....
17.
ADAM L., JIN J., KHAN A. Does the Indonesian farmer empowerment policy enhance the professional farmer? Technology in Society, 68, 101924, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
18.
LI J., PENG R., LI Y., CHI Y. Environmental Benefits of the Central China Rise Strategy; Empirical Analysis Based on the PSM-DID Model. Recent Patents on Engineering, 17 (2), 2022.
https://doi.org/10.2174/187221....
19.
MIRZIYOYEVA Z., SALAHODJAEV R. Renewable energy and CO2 emissions intensity in the top carbon intense countries. Renewable Energy, 192, 507, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene....
20.
ASHOORI S., GATES I.D. Carbon intensity of in-situ oil sands operations with direct contact steam generation lower than that of once-through steam generation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 367, 133046, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
21.
MENG Z., LI W., CHEN C., GUAN C. Carbon Emission Reduction Effects of the Digital Economy: Mechanisms and Evidence from 282 Cities in China. Land, 12 (4), 12040773, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land12....
22.
AN K., WANG X. Optimizing the Development Area to take the lead in Peaks-based on Location Quotient Analysis. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 295 (2), 012062, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1....
23.
LIU L., ZHANG Y., LIU B., XIU P., SUN L. How to Achieve Carbon Neutrality: From the Perspective of Innovative City Pilot Policy in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (24), 16539, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid:36554421 PMCid:PMC9779227.
24.
TANG Y., JIANG H. Analysis of the decoupling effect and driving factors of carbon emissions from the transportation sector in Guangdong Province. Scientific Reports, 13 (1), 18744, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598... PMid:37907481 PMCid:PMC10618480.
25.
WEN L., SUN S. Can China's new rural pension scheme alleviate the relative poverty of rural households? Australian Economic Papers, 62 (3), 396, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8....
26.
REN H., OU X., ZHU H. Spatial characteristics and coupling coordination between carbon emission efficiency and industrial structure in three metropolitan areas of Jiangsu Province, China. Science Progress, 106 (2), 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1177/003685... PMid:37291886 PMCid:PMC10358629.
27.
VERHEUVEL N., WITTEMAN J., VLAANDEREN M. Synthetic Control Method for Dutch Policy Evaluation. De Economist, 171 (1), 31, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645... PMid:36620520 PMCid:PMC9806815.
28.
BETHGE M., FAUSER D., ZOLLMANN P., STREIBELT M. Utilisation of rehabilitation due to mental disorders during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a difference-in-differences analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 23 (1), 137, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888... PMid:36879211 PMCid:PMC9987356.
29.
LI L., BAI Y., YANG X., GAO Z., QIAO F., LIANG J., ZHANG C. A Low-Carbon Land Use Management Framework Based on Urban Carbon Metabolism: A Case of a Typical Coal Resource-Based City in China. Sustainability, 14 (21), 13854, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su1421....
30.
DU X., YU Y., AHENKORA B.F., PANG Y. Decoupling economic growth from building embodied carbon emissions in China: A nighttime light data-based innovation approach. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 43, 34, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.....
31.
LI Z., CAI Y., LIN G. Pathways for sustainable municipal energy systems transition: A case study of Tangshan, a resource-based city in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129835, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....