About the Journal
In Memory of Professor Jerzy Radecki
Ownership and Management Statement
Editorial Office
Editorial Board
Scope
Impact Factor
Indexed by
Journal Impact Factor contributing items
Publication Frequency
Revenue Sources & Business Model
Contact
Subscription
Current issue
Online first
Instructions for Authors
Copyright & Licensing
Publication Fees
Editorial policies
Publication Policy Overview
Peer Review Policy
Research Ethics and Malpractice Policy
Plagiarism Policy
Conflict of Interest Policy
Open Access Policy
Instructions for Reviewers
Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies Policy
Advertising Policy
Direct Marketing & Manuscript Solicitation
Digital Archiving and Preservation Policy
CrossMark, Correction, and Retraction Policy
Archive
Publication Fees
Copyright & Licensing
Editorial policies
Publication Policy Overview
Peer Review Policy
Research Ethics and Malpractice Policy
Plagiarism Policy
Conflict of Interest Policy
Open Access Policy
Instructions for Reviewers
Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies Policy
Advertising Policy
Direct Marketing & Manuscript Solicitation
Digital Archiving and Preservation Policy
CrossMark, Correction, and Retraction Policy
eISSN: 2083-5906
ISSN: 1230-1485
ISSN: 1230-1485
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
The Impact of Environmental Regulation
on Green Innovation of Environmental Enterprises
in China: The Moderating Effect of R&D
Investment and Government Green Subsidies
1
Institute of Environment and Economics, Faculty of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China
2
School of Finance and Trade, Faculty of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China
Submission date: 2023-09-20
Final revision date: 2024-02-06
Acceptance date: 2024-03-05
Online publication date: 2024-06-19
Publication date: 2025-01-02
Corresponding author
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(1):447-461
KEYWORDS
environmental regulationenvironmental industriesgreen innovationR&D investmentgovernment green subsidy
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The implementation of the New Environmental Protection Law (NEPL) in 2015 is a fundamental
and effective way to strengthen environmental governance in China since the original version was
released in 1989. This study explores whether environmental regulations affect the green innovations of
environmental enterprises in China by treating the implementation of the New Environmental Protection
Law (NEPL) as a quasi-natural experiment. Using green patent data from 419 A-share listed enterprises
from 2012 to 2021, we find that the implementation of the NEPL increases the number of both green
invention patent applications and green utility model patent applications in environmental industries.
In addition, there is an accelerating effect because of sufficient R&D investment and a crowding-out
effect because of excessive government subsidies. The research results also show that green patents of
state-owned enterprises, large enterprises, and enterprises located in areas with strong environmental
governance are significantly increased. These findings provide theoretical and empirical basics for
the authorities to formulate more targeted policies to motivate innovations in environmental enterprises.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (55)
1.
JÄNICKE M. Green growth: From a growing ecoindustry to economic sustainability. Energy Policy. 48, 13, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
2.
LI B., WANG Y., WANG Z., CAI W. Current Situation, Problems and Suggestions on the Development of Environmental Protection Industry in China. Environmental Protection. 49 (2), 9, 2021.
3.
HU Y. Development Sequence and Policy Evolution of China's Environmental Protection Industry. Journal of China University of Geosciences, Social Sciences Edition. 18 (1), 95, 2018.
4.
WANG Z., CAO Y., LIN S. The characteristics and heterogeneity of environmental regulation's impact on enterprises' green technology innovation: Based on green patent data of listed firms in China. Studies in Science of Science. 39 (5), 909, 2021.
5.
JIANG T., JI P., SHI Y., YE Z., JIN Q. Efficiency assessment of green technology innovation of renewable energy enterprises in China: a dynamic data envelopment analysis considering undesirable output. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 23 (5), 1509, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098....
6.
SHI Y., LI Y. An Evolutionary Game Analysis on Green Technological Innovation of New Energy Enterprises under the Heterogeneous Environmental Regulation Perspective. Sustainability. 14 (10), 6340, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1410....
7.
LI S., ZHOU X., LI J., WU Z. Effect Mechanism and Path Simulation of Environmental Regulation in the Process of Co-agglomeration Evolution of Environmental Protection Industry and Manufacturing Industry. Science and Technology Management Research. 43 (15), 239, 2023.
8.
BORSATTO J.M.L.S., AMUI L.B.L. Green innovation: Unfolding the relation with environmental regulations and competitiveness. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 149, 445, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resc... PMCid:PMC7592848.
9.
ASHFORD N.A., AYERS C., STONE R.F. Using Regulation to Change the Market for Innovation. Harvard Environmental Law Review. 9 (2), 419, 1985.
10.
PORTER M., VAN DER LINDE C. Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. The Dynamics of the eco-efficient economy: environmental regulation and competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review. 73 (5), 1995.
11.
DECHEZLEPRÊTRE A., KOŹLUK T., KRUSE T., NACHTIGALL D., SERRES A. D. Do Environmental and Economic Performance Go Together? A Review of Micro-level Empirical Evidence from the Past Decade or So. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics. 13 (1-2), 1, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00....
12.
AMBEC S., COHEN M.A., ELGIE S., LANOIE P. The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 7 (1), 2, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/r... .
13.
PALMER K., OATES W. E., PORTNEY P.R. Tightening environmental standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 9 (4), 119, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.....
14.
BEL G., JOSEPH S. Policy stringency under the European Union Emission trading system and its impact on technological change in the energy sector. Energy Policy. 117, 434, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
15.
ACAR O. A., TARAKCI M., VAN KNIPPENBERG D. Creativity and Innovation Under Constraints: A Cross-Disciplinary Integrative Review. Journal of Management. 45 (1), 96, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920....
16.
CAI X., ZHU B., ZHANG H., LI L., XIE M. Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Science of The Total Environment. 746, 140810, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:32750583.
17.
DU K., CHENG Y., YAO X. Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: The road to the green transformation of Chinese cities. Energy Economics. 98, 105247, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
18.
OUYANG X., LI Q., DU K. How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data. Energy Policy. 139, 111310, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
19.
ZHANG J., OUYANG Y., BALLESTEROS-PÉREZ P., LI H., PHILBIN S. P., LI Z., SKITMORE M. Understanding the impact of environmental regulations on green technology innovation efficiency in the construction industry. Sustainable Cities and Society. 65, 102647, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.....
20.
KHADDAGE-SOBOH N., SAFI A., FAISAL RASHEED M., HASNAOUI A. Examining the role of natural resource rent, environmental regulations, and environmental taxes in sustainable development: Evidence from G-7 economies. Resources Policy. 86, 104071, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso....
21.
RAMANATHAN R., HE Q., BLACK A., GHOBADIAN A., GALLEAR D. Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 155, 79, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
22.
JIN C., TSAI F.-S., GU Q., WU B. Does the porter hypothesis work well in the emission trading schema pilot? Exploring moderating effects of institutional settings. Research in International Business and Finance. 62, 101732, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riba....
23.
DE MEDEIROS J.F., RIBEIRO J.L.D., CORTIMIGLIA M.N. Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 65, 76, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
24.
LODI C., BERTARELLI S. Eco-innovation and exports in heterogeneous firms: pollution haven effect and Porter hypothesis as competing theories. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 32 (7), 923, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/104385....
25.
HOJNIK J., RUZZIER M. What drives eco-innovation? A review of an emerging literature. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 19, 31, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist....
26.
LU Z., LI H. Does environmental information disclosure affect green innovation? Economic Analysis and Policy. 80, 47, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.....
27.
KARIMI TAKALO S., SAYYADI TOORANLOO H., SHAHABALDINI PARIZI Z. Green innovation: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 279, 122474, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
28.
SAUNILA M., UKKO J., RANTALA T. Sustainability as a driver of green innovation investment and exploitation. Journal of Cleaner Production. 179, 631, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
29.
CHEN L., LI K., CHEN S., WANG X., TANG L. Industrial activity, energy structure, and environmental pollution in China. Energy Economics. 104, 105633, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
30.
BERRONE P., FOSFURI A., GELABERT L. Does Greenwashing Pay Off? Understanding the Relationship Between Environmental Actions and Environmental Legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics. 144 (2), 363, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551....
31.
TONG T.W., HE W., HE Z.-L., LU J. Patent Regime Shift and Firm Innovation: Evidence from the Second Amendment to China's Patent Law. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2014 (1), 14174, 2014. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.....
32.
TRUONG Y., MAZLOOMI H., BERRONE P. Understanding the impact of symbolic and substantive environmental actions on organizational reputation. Industrial Marketing Management. 92, 307, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indm....
33.
LIAN G., XU A., ZHU Y. Substantive green innovation or symbolic green innovation? The impact of ER on enterprise green innovation based on the dual moderating effects. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 7 (3), 100203, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.....
34.
LIU X. Substantial Innovation or Strategic Innovation: The Influence of ESG Performance on Corporate Innovation Strategy. SHS Web of Conferences. 169, 01063, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1051/shscon....
35.
PENG C., JIANG H., ZHANG T. Does the national risk of overseas investment affect the strategic innovation behavior of enterprises? Evidence from China. Managerial and Decision Economics. 43 (5), 1548, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.34....
36.
WANG F., LI A., GAO W. Whether Carbon Finance Promotes the Green Innovation: Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on Carbon Emission Trading Policy. Journal of Lanzhou University, Social Sciences. 50 (6), 59, 2022.
37.
SUN T., LI R. Development Status of China's Environmental Protection Industry Chain and Operation Mode of Its Sub-industries. Science and Technology Management Research. 42 (2), 209, 2022.
38.
ZHANG X., XU W., LI B., WANG Y., JIA P. Construction and Evaluation of China's Environmental Protection Industry Development Index. Environmental Protection. 46 (2), 35, 2018.
39.
HUANG H., MBANYELE W., WANG F., SONG M., WANG Y. Climbing the quality ladder of green innovation: Does green finance matter? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 184, 122007, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
40.
NEUMANN T. Does it pay for new firms to be green? An empirical analysis of when and how different greening strategies affect the performance of new firms. Journal of Cleaner Production. 317, 128403, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
41.
LIU R., JIN T. Performance Appraisal, Exchange Effect and Economic Development: The Short-termism of Local Governments. Modern Economic Science. 37 (3), 9, 2015.
42.
GHEITARANI F., GUEVARA R., NAWASER K., JAHANSHAHI A. A. Identifying Dimensions of Dynamic Technological Capability: A Systematic Review of the Last Two Decades of Research. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management. 19 (04), 2230002, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1142/S02198....
43.
MENDOZA-SILVA A. Innovation capability: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Innovation Management. 24 (3), 707, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-0....
44.
ZHANG Y., WANG Y. Do Managerial Ties Help or Hinder Corporate Green Innovation? The Moderating Roles of Contextual Factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (7), 4019, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid:35409701 PMCid:PMC8998266.
45.
LIAO Z., LIU Y. What drives environmental innovation? A meta-analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment. 30 (4), 1852, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.27....
46.
ZHANG D. Do heterogenous subsides work differently on environmental innovation? A mechanism exploration approach. Energy Economics. 114, 106233, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
47.
HU D., QIU L., SHE M., WANG Y. Sustaining the sustainable development: How do firms turn government green subsidies into financial performance through green innovation? Business Strategy and the Environment. 30 (5), 2271, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.27....
48.
LI Y., TONG Y., YE F., SONG J. The choice of the governement green subsidy scheme: innovation subsidy vs. product subsidy. International Journal of Production Research. 58 (16), 4932, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075....
49.
REN S., SUN H., ZHANG T. Do environmental subsidies spur environmental innovation? Empirical evidence from Chinese listed firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 173, 121123, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
50.
XUE F., CHEN Q., CHAN K. C., YI Z. Is corporate social responsibility value relevant? Evidence from a quasinatural experiment of anti-corruption campaign. Journal of Business Research. 140, 520, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
51.
YU Z. Environmental Protection Interview, Government Environmental Protection Subsidies and Enterprise Green Innovation. Foreign Economics & Management. 43 (7), 22, 2021.
52.
WEN S., SHI H., GUO J. Research on the Emission Reduction Effect of Green Finance from the Perspective of General Equilibrium Theory: Modeling and Empirical Test. Chinese Journal of Management Science. 30 (12), 173, 2022.
53.
WANG X., LIU J., ZHAO Y. Effectiveness Measurement of Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zone. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics. 38 (10), 107, 2021.
54.
FU Y., HE C., LUO L. Does the low-carbon city policy make a difference? Empirical evidence of the pilot scheme in China with DEA and PSM-DID. Ecological Indicators. 122, 107238, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
55.
YANG Y., WANG Y. Research on the Impact of Environmental Regulations on the Green Innovation Efficiency of Chinese Industrial Enterprises. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 30 (2), 1433, 2021. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes....
CITATIONS (2):
1.
The more government subsidies, the lower the green innovation efficiency? Evidence from China's energy-intensive industries
Feng Peng, Cong Yu, Shuzhen Zhou
Energy Strategy Reviews
Feng Peng, Cong Yu, Shuzhen Zhou
Energy Strategy Reviews
2.
Institutional Contexts and the Dialectical Dynamics of Government Subsidies How Environmental Regulation and Market Competition Shape Green Innovation Outcomes
Hongsheng Zhang, Yang Wang, Shaojing Zhang, Xinyi Jiang
International Review of Economics & Finance
Hongsheng Zhang, Yang Wang, Shaojing Zhang, Xinyi Jiang
International Review of Economics & Finance
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2083-5906 |
| ISSN: | 1230-1485 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
