ORIGINAL RESEARCH
World Heritage Beech Forests and Regional Socio-Economic Policy at the Slovak-Ukrainian Border
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of High Mountain Biology, University of Zilina, Tatranska Javorina, Slovakia Republic
 
 
Submission date: 2019-01-28
 
 
Final revision date: 2019-03-05
 
 
Acceptance date: 2019-03-28
 
 
Online publication date: 2019-12-05
 
 
Publication date: 2020-02-13
 
 
Corresponding author
Jaroslav Solár   

Institute of High Mountain Biology, University of Zilina, Tatranska Javorina 7, 059 56, Tatranska Javorina, Slovak Republic
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2020;29(2):1869-1878
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The trilateral biosphere reserve in the Eastern Carpathians borders Poland, Slovakia and Ukraine and represents a key model for conserving biological diversity with respect to socio-economic and sustainable development. It is the regional representative of much diversity (language, history, culture, legal framework, and land use and management), and ecological studies are more accessible than data on the mutual effect of nature conservation on the local economy. Our study compares demography, land use, revenue of local stakeholders and the development of eco-tourism using data from the Slovakian and Ukrainian UNESCO World Heritage regions, where both Slovak and Ukrainian stakeholders profit mainly from the forestry industry, though additional but small incomes are derived from local recreation. Incomes from tourism are higher in Ukraine than in Slovakia, while in Slovakia significantly higher income comes in from local taxes than in Ukraine. These factors lead to depopulation (especially of young people) and marginalization of nature conservancy in the region. The forestry industry, with few and less sophisticated job opportunities, and a generally negative impact on the environment (intensive logging, soil erosion, etc.), casually suppresses the creation and development of eco-tourism essentials to the region. To mitigate this effect, this study suggests several steps toward the development of eco-tourism in the Eastern Carpathians–Poloniny region.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
 
CITATIONS (7):
1.
In what context do scholars differentiate recreation and tourism in park studies?
Yefeng Xie, Bihu Wu, Yan Fang, Linsheng Zhong
Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism
 
2.
The Potential of European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in the Hemiboreal Baltic Region: A Review
Kaspars Liepiņš, Alise Bleive
Forests
 
3.
Tourism in Depopulation Contexts: A Hybrid Bibliometric and Narrative Systematic Review
Adrián Oliver-Esteban, Raúl Romero-Calcerrada
World
 
4.
Nature-Based Tourism in National and Natural Parks in Europe: A Systematic Review
Delia S. Donici, Diana E. Dumitras
Forests
 
5.
Applying Q-methodology to investigate the perception of the social and economic role of the national park by local stakeholders. Cases of national parks in the Carpathians
Bernadetta Zawilińska, Janetta Nestorová Dická, Elena Matei, Juraj Švajda, Mariusz Łapczyński, Karol Majewski, Balázs Megyeri, Alexandru Cosmin Călin, Alena Gessert
Journal for Nature Conservation
 
6.
Geoheritage and Geodiversity of Cenozoic Volcanic Fields in Saudi Arabia
Károly Németh, Mohammed Rashad H. Moufti
 
7.
Carpathian Forests: Past and Recent Developments
Dariia Kholiavchuk, Wolfgang Gurgiser, Stefan Mayr
Forests
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top