ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Study on the Response of Habitat Quality
to Land Use Change in the Middle and
Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River
Based on the InVEST-GWR Model
More details
Hide details
1
School of Economics and Management, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China
Submission date: 2024-03-15
Final revision date: 2024-05-08
Acceptance date: 2024-07-09
Online publication date: 2024-11-05
Publication date: 2025-08-20
Corresponding author
Ran Yu
School of Economics and Management, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(5):6465-6481
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River are not only the areas with high biodiversity
levels in China, but also the areas with the fastest economic development rate. The continuous change
in regional land use has a profound impact on the structure and quality of the regional ecosystem.
Therefore, to reveal the impacts of land use changes on habitat quality, this study used the InVEST model
and geographically weighted regression (GWR) model to estimate the habitat quality quantitatively and
analyze the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of the habitat quality based on the land use data
in the years of 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 in the area of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze
River. The results showed that the main land use types in the study area were paddy land and forest
land, and the area of the two types accounted for more than 65% of the whole area. From 1990 to 2020,
construction land expanded by 452.68 km2 and was concentrated along the Yangtze River and in the
downtown areas of Maanshan City, Wuhu City, and Tongling City, while the farmland in the study
area was reduced by 1227.92 km2. From the perspective of habitat quality, the area proportion of the
lowest grade of habitat quality increased from 4.85% in 1990 to 8.47% in 2020. The average values of
habitat quality were 0.5918 in 1990, 0.5902 in 2000, 0.5850 in 2010, and 0.5814 in 2020, which showed
a trend of continuous decline in the average value of habitat quality in the study area. The areas with
low values of habitat quality were mainly concentrated along the Yangtze River. From 2010 to 2020, the
impact of paddy land and dry land on habitat quality showed a two-level differentiation trend, and the
lowest regression coefficients were -0.4431 and -0.121, respectively. The impact of forest land on habitat
quality was mainly positive, with the highest value of the regression coefficient of 0.657. The impact of construction land on habitat quality was mainly negative, and it was concentrated along the Yangtze
River and south of it, with the lowest value of -1.0625.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (71)
1.
LEAL W., BARBIR J., SIMA M., KALBUS A., NAGY G.J., PALETTA A., VILLAMIZAR A., MARTINEZ R., AZEITEIRO U.M., PEREIRA M.J., MUSSETTA P.C., IVARS J.D., GUERRA J., NEIVA S.D., MONCADA S., GALDIES C., KLAVINS M., NIKOLOVA M., GOGU R.C., BALOGUN A.L., BOUREDJI A., BONOLI A. Reviewing the role of ecosystems services in the sustainability of the urban environment: A multi-country analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
2.
GU L., YAN J.B., LI Y.R., GONG Z.W. Spatial-temporal evolution and correlation analysis between habitat quality and landscape patterns based on land use change in Shaanxi Province, China. Ecology and Evolution, 13 (11), 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1....
3.
REGOLIN A., OLIVEIRA-SANTOS L.G., RIBEIRO M.C., BAILEY L.L. Habitat quality, not habitat amount, drives mammalian habitat use in the Brazilian Pantanal. Landscape Ecology, 36 (9), 2519, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980....
4.
MULLER K.L., STAMPS J.A., KRISHNAN V.V., WILLITS N.H. The effects of conspecific attraction and habitat quality on habitat selection in territorial birds (Troglodytes aedon). The American Naturalist, 150 (5), 650, 1997.
https://doi.org/10.1086/286087.
5.
MAES D., VAN DYCK H. Habitat quality and biodiversity indicator performances of a threatened butterfly versus a multispecies group for wet heathlands in Belgium. Biological Conservation, 123 (2), 177, 2005.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioc....
6.
HERMOSILLA-PALMA K., PLISCOFF P., FOLCHI M. Sixty years of land-use and land-cover change dynamics in a global biodiversity hotspot under threat from global change. Journal of Land Use Science, 16 (5-6), 467, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1080/174742....
7.
DENG Y., JIANG W.G., WANG W., LV J.X., CHEN K. Urban expansion led to the degradation of habitat quality in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38 (12), 2018.
https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb20....
8.
BAI L., XIU C., FENG X.H., LIU D. Influence of urbanization on regional habitat quality: a case study of Changchun City. Habitat International, 93, 102042, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habi....
9.
LIANG X.Y., YUAN L.H., NING L.X., SONG C.Q., CHENG C.X., WANG X.Y. Spatial pattern of habitat quality and driving factors in Heilongjiang Province. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 56 (06), 864, 2020.
10.
WANG L.Z., LYONS J., KANEHL P., GATTI R. Influences of watershed land use on habitat quality and biotic integrity in Wisconsin streams. Fisheries, 22 (6), 6, 1997.
https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8...<0006:IOWLUO>2.0.CO;2
11.
FENG T., MEICHEN F., LI W., PENGTAO Z. Land-use change in Changli County, China: Predicting its spatiotemporal evolution in habitat quality. Ecological Indicators, 117, 106719, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
12.
YANG L.Y., PAN S.P., CHEN W.X., ZENG J., XU H., GU T.C. Spatially non-stationary response of habitat quality to land use activities in World's protected areas over 20 years. Journal of Cleaner Production, 419, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
13.
ALBERT C.H., RAYFIELD B., DUMITRU M., GONZALEZ A. Applying network theory to prioritize multispecies habitat networks that are robust to climate and land-use change. Conservation Biology, 31 (6), 1383, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.1....
14.
ZHENG Y.P., ZHANG J.H., TIAN H.W., ZHU H.C., LIU S., DING Y.P. Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Habitat Quality and Natural-human Driven Mechanism in Dabie Mountain Area. Environmental Science, 1, 2023.
15.
HAO J.Y., ZHI L.H., LI X.W., DONG S.K., LI W. Temporal and spatial evolution characteristics and relationships of land use pattern and ecosystem services in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1, 2023.
16.
WANG J., LIU H.Y., LI Y.F., LIU L., XIE F.F., LOU C.R., ZHANG H.B. Effects of Spartina alterniflora invasion on quality of the red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis) wintering habitat. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26 (21), 21546, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
17.
ZHANG Y., WANG R.H., LIU C.W., ZHOU L.M. Simulation and prediction of habitat quality in Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 1, 2023.
18.
ROCHA-ORTEGA M., RODRÍGUEZ P., CÓRDOBA-AGUILAR A. Spatial and temporal effects of land use change as potential drivers of odonate community composition but not species richness. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28 (2), 451, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531....
19.
MUHAR S., SCHWARZ M., SCHMUTZ S., JUNGWIRTH M. Identification of rivers with high and good habitat quality: methodological approach and applications in Austria. Hydrobiologia, 422, 343, 2000.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
20.
TOLVANEN H., RÖNKÄ M., VIHERVAARA P., KAMPPINEN M., ARZEL C., AARRAS N., THESSLER S. Spatial information in ecosystem service assessment: data applicability in the cascade model context. Journal of Land Use Science, 11 (3), 350, 2016.
21.
GIL-GONZÁLEZ S., ALVIS-ZAPATA N., RODRÍGUEZ-HURTADO C., DIAS L.G. Diversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates and habitat quality in tributaries of the national natural park Selva Florencia. Acta Biologica Colombiana, 28 (2), 319, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.15446/abc.v....
22.
ZHU C.X., ZHONG Z.Z., LONG Y., YAN D. Spatiotemporal variation of ecosystem services and their drivers in the Yellow River Basin, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 42 (10), 2502, 2023.
23.
GEBRELIBANOS T., ASSEN M. Land use/land cover dynamics and their driving forces in the Hirmi watershed and its adjacent agro-ecosystem, highlands of Northern Ethiopia. Journal of Land Use Science, 10 (1), 81, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1080/174742....
24.
BOUMANS R., COSTANZA R., FARLEY J., WILSON M.A., PORTELA R., ROTMANS J., VILLA F., GRASSO M. Modeling the dynamics of the integrated earth system and the value of global ecosystem services using the GUMBO model. Ecological Economics, 41 (3), 529, 2002.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-....
25.
PHILLIPS S.J., DUDÍK M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography, 31 (2), 161, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906....
26.
ZHANG Z., ZHANG H., FENG J., WANG Y.R., LIU K. Evaluation of Social Values for Ecosystem Services in Urban Riverfront Space Based on the SolVES Model: A Case Study of the Fenghe River, Xi'an, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (5), 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
27.
SALLUSTIO L., DE TONI A., STROLLO A., DI FEBBRARO M., GISSI E., CASELLA L., GENELETTI D., MUNAFÒ M., VIZZARRI M., MARCHETTI M. Assessing habitat quality in relation to the spatial distribution of protected areas in Italy. Journal of Environmental Management, 201, 129, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
28.
MA L., JIN T.T., WEN Y.H., WU X.Q., LIU G.H. The Research Progress of InVEST Model. Ecological Economy, 31 (10), 126, 2015.
29.
WANG X.M., LIU X.C., X.L.Y., ZHANG Y.B. Spatial-temporal changes and influencing factors of ecosystem services in Shaoguan City based on improved InVEST. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 27 (05), 381, 2020.
30.
ANESEYEE B., NOSZCZYK T., SOROMESSA T., ELIAS E. The InVEST habitat quality model associated with land use/cover changes: A qualitative case study of the Winike Watershed in the Omo-Gibe Basin, Southwest Ethiopia. Remote Sensing, 12 (7), 2020.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs1207....
31.
HU J.Y., ZHANG J.X., LI Y.Q. Exploring the spatial and temporal driving mechanisms of landscape patterns on habitat quality in a city undergoing rapid urbanization based on GTWR and MGWR: The case of Nanjing, China. Ecological Indicators, 143, 109333, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
32.
WU J.Y., LUO J.A., ZHANG H., QIN S., YU M.J. Projections of land use change and habitat quality assessment by coupling climate change and development patterns. Science of the Total Environment, 847, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
33.
YANG H.F., YANG S.L., XU K.H., MILLIMAN J.D., WANG H., YANG Z., CHEN Z., ZHANG C.Y. Human impacts on sediment in the Yangtze River: A review and new perspectives. Global and Planetary Change, 162, 8, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glop....
34.
HAAS J., BAN Y.F. Urban growth and environmental impacts in Jing-Jin-Ji, the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 30, 42, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.....
35.
ZHAO J.H., WANG S.S., TU G.J., ZHOU Y.K., WU X.B. Morphological and molecular characterization of Ortleppascaris sinensis sp. nov. (Nematoda: Ascaridoidea) from the Chinese alligator Alligator sinensis. Journal of Helminthology, 90 (3), 303, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S00221....
36.
FANG J., WANG Z., ZHAO S., LI Y., TANG Z., YU D., NI L. Biodiversity changes in the lakes of the Central Yangtze. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4 (9), 369, 2006.
https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9....
37.
YANG X.D., DONG X.H., CHEN X., WANG R., WANG Q., LIN Q., XU M. Past environmental changes and management suggestions for lakes in the Yangtze River economic belt. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 35 (08), 977, 2020.
38.
LIU Y.T., YANG Z., XU G.L., LIU B., ZHANG P., CHI J.Y. Impacts of urbanization on habitat quality using MGWR models in Wanjiang City Belt. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 43 (02), 280, 2023.
39.
CHEN Z.J., LIU Y.M., ZHANG Y.J., ZHONG Z.Q. Interregional economic spillover and carbon productivity embodied in trade: empirical study from the Pan-Yangtze River Delta Region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28 (6), 7390, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
40.
DENG X., LI Z. A review on historical trajectories and spatially explicit scenarios of land-use and land-cover changes in China. Journal of Land Use Science, 11 (6), 709, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1080/174742....
41.
DIAZ-PACHECO J., GUTIÉRREZ J. Exploring the limitations of CORINE Land Cover for monitoring urban land-use dynamics in metropolitan areas. Journal of Land Use Science, 9 (3), 243, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1080/174742....
42.
LI Y.F., LUO Y.C., LIU G., OUYANG Z.Y., ZHENG H. Effects of land use change on ecosystem services: a case study in Miyun reservoir watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33 (03), 726, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb20....
43.
YANG H., LI X.N., DENG Z.J., ZHANG Z.Y., PAN H.P. Spatial and temporal evolution of habitat quality in Dianchi Lake basin based on the land use/cover change. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 1, 2023.
44.
PAN H., YIN Y.H., HOU W.J., HAN H.S. Spatiotemporal variation of habitat quality in the Source Region of the Yellow River based on land use and vegetation cover changes. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42 (19), 7978, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb20....
45.
HAN Y.L., CHEN K.L., YU D.Y. Evaluation on the Impact of Land Use Change on Habitat Quality in Qinghai Lake Basin. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 28 (10), 2035, 2019.
46.
CHEN S., CHEN Y., FENG T.Z., CHAO L. Evaluation of the Status of Natural Habitat Restoration in the Liao River's Riparian Zone. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 30 (3), 2509, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes....
47.
HE J., HUANG J., LI C. The evaluation for the impact of land use change on habitat quality: A joint contribution of cellular automata scenario simulation and habitat quality assessment model. Ecological Modelling, 366, 58, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
48.
WANG H.K., GAO B., DING B.Y. Temporal and spatial distribution of food security production and total water resources in western Jilin: based on center of the gravity model. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 1, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8....
49.
LONG Y., JIANG F.G., SUN H., WANG T.H., ZOU Q., CHEN C.S. Estimating vegetation carbon storage based on optimal bandwidth selected from geographically weighted regression model in Shenzhen City. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42 (12), 4933, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb20....
50.
AN A., ZHANG Y., CAO L., JIA Q., WANG X. A potential distribution map of wintering Swan Goose (Anser cygnoides) in the middle and lower Yangtze River floodplain, China. Avian Research, 9, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657....
51.
HE S.K. A study on the coordination mechanism and policy system of environmental governance and green development in the Yangtze River economic belt. Contemporary Economic Management, 41 (08), 57, 2019.
52.
LI M.Y., ZHOU Y., XIAO P.N., TIAN Y., HUANG H., XIAO L. Evolution of habitat quality and its topographic gradient effect in northwest Hubei Province from 2000 to 2020 based on the InVEST model. Land, 10 (8), 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land10....
53.
YANG J., ZHANG D.G., CHEN J.G. Analysis on spatial-temporal variation of habitat quality in China based on land use change. Grassland and Turf, 40 (05), 36, 2020.
54.
TIAN Y., ZHANG J.B., HE K., FENG J.H. Analysis of farmers' low-carbon agricultural production behavior and its influencing factors: A case study of fertilizer application and pesticide use. China Rural Survey, (04), 61, 2015.
55.
WIEGAND T., NAVES J., GARBULSKY M.F., FERNÁNDEZ N. Animal habitat quality and ecosystem functioning: Exploring seasonal patterns using NDVI. Ecological Monographs, 78 (1), 87, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.1890/06-187....
56.
LI J., LI S., ZHANG Y., PANG J.C. Spatio-temporal variation of biodiversity maintenance function and its driving factors in the Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2020. China Environment Science, 43 (09), 4780, 2023.
57.
LISHAWA S.C., DUNTON E.M., PEARSALL D.R., MONKS A.M., HIMMLER K.B., CARSON B.D., LOGES B., ALBERT D.A. Wetland waterbird food resources increased by harvesting invasive cattails. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 84 (7), 1326, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.2....
58.
GREET J. The potential of soil seed banks of a eucalypt wetland forest to aid restoration. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 24 (5), 565, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273....
59.
IGNACIO P., BERTA M.L., MARION P. National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosystem Services, 4, 104, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecos....
60.
XIAO S.C., WU W.J., GUO J., OU M.H., PUEPPKE S.G., OU W.X., TAO Y. An evaluation framework for designing ecological security patterns and prioritizing ecological corridors: application in Jiangsu Province, China. Landscape Ecology, 35 (11), 2517, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980....
61.
VAN DER WINDT H.J., SWART J.A.A. Ecological corridors, connecting science and politics: the case of the Green River in the Netherlands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45 (1), 124, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
63.
LIN Q.Y., SEKAR R., MARRS R., ZHANG Y.X. Effect of river ecological restoration on biofilm microbial community composition. Water, 11 (6), 2019.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061....
64.
BAI Z.L., WANG S.D., FAN Q.H., ZHANG H.B. Identification of key areas for ecological protection and restoration in territorial space based on ecological security pattern: A case study in Haicheng city. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 1, 2023.
65.
PERKINS O., MILLINGTON J.D.A. The importance of agricultural yield elasticity for indirect land use change: a Bayesian network analysis for robust uncertainty quantification. Journal of Land Use Science, 15 (4), 509, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1080/174742....
66.
ZHOU Y., TAN J.Y., DENG W., SUN X.Y. Monitoring and evaluation of cultivated land quality in the rotation and fallow pilot areas of Hunan Province. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, (08), 17, 2023.
67.
MACCHI L., GRAU H.R., PHALAN B. Agricultural production and bird conservation in complex landscapes of the dry Chaco. Journal of Land Use Science, 11 (2), 188, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1080/174742....
68.
CAO Y., WANG C., SU Y., DUAN H.L., WU X.M., LU R., SU Q., WU Y.T., CHU Z.J. Study on spatiotemporal evolution and driving forces of habitat quality in the basin along the Yangtze River in Anhui Province based on InVEST model. Land, 12 (5), 1092, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land12....
69.
MARTÍNEZ-RAMOS M., PINGARRONI A., RODRÍGUEZ-VELÁZQUEZ J., TOLEDO-CHELALA L., ZERMEÑO-HERNÁNDEZ I., BONGERS F. Natural forest regeneration and ecological restoration in human-modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica, 48 (6), 745, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12....
70.
BROWNE C.L., HECNAR S.J. Species loss and shifting population structure of freshwater turtles despite habitat protection. Biological Conservation, 138 (3-4), 421, 2007.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioc....
71.
MA K.P. Biodiversity monitoring relies on the integration of human observation and automatic collection of data with advanced equipment and facilities. Biodiversity Science, 24 (11), 1201, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.17520/biods....