REVIEW PAPER
Bibliometric Analysis of Mercury Removal
from Flue Gas Based on Web of Science
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500,
China
2
National-Regional Engineering Center for Recovery of Waste Gases from Metallurgical and Chemical Industries,
Kunming 650500, China
3
Kunming Econ Technology Co., Ltd., Kunming 650607, China
Submission date: 2025-03-16
Final revision date: 2025-06-30
Acceptance date: 2025-08-03
Online publication date: 2025-09-24
Corresponding author
Dongdong Zhang
Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500,
China
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This study utilized HistCite, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace analytical tools to generate visualizations
of data retrieved from the Web of Science (WOS) database, aiming to comprehensively understand
current research status and frontier trends in flue gas mercury removal. A systematic analysis was
conducted on 2,489 publications spanning 1998 to 2024, involving contributions from 4,496 authors at
1,245 institutions across 64 countries, published in 290 journals. The results indicate that the number
of publications in the field of flue gas mercury removal has demonstrated an overall upward trend
over the past two decades. Currently, China and Huazhong University of Science and Technology
are identified as the most productive country and research institution, respectively, in this research
domain. Environmental Science & Technology emerges as the most influential and authoritative journal
in flue gas mercury removal studies. Keyword cluster analysis reveals three predominant research
themes: adsorption-based mercury removal technologies utilizing activated carbon and other adsorbent
materials, catalytic oxidation mercury removal technologies, and oxidation-based mercury removal
technologies. Furthermore, keyword burst detection analysis highlights that the simultaneous removal
of SO2, NOx, and Hg0 has become a current research focus in this field.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (58)
1.
MA Y.P., WANG J.D., GU W.T., ZHANG X.J., XU H.M., HUANG W.J., GUO Y.H., WANG S.B. New insights into elemental mercury removal from flue gas by a MoS₂ heterogeneous system. Chemical Engineering Journal, 433, 8, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.....
2.
WEI Z., TANG M., HUANG Z., JIAO H. Mercury removal from flue gas using nitrate as an electron acceptor in a membrane biofilm reactor. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16 (2), 20, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783....
3.
ZHAO B., WANG S., HAO J. Challenges and perspectives of air pollution control in China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 18 (6), 68, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783....
4.
WANG Z., PAN L., LI Y., XU W., NIE T., SUN Z. Effect of emission standard of air pollutants for thermal power plants on regional acid deposition: a numerical simulation. China Environmental Science, 34 (9), 2420, 2014.
5.
ZHAO Z., YANG J., ZHAO M., ZHU J. Mercury waste management in China: implications on the implementation of the Minamata Convention on Mercury. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 25 (5), 2584, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163....
6.
LI S., GAO L., HE S., YANG D., WANG C., ZHENG Y. Carbon capture in power sector of China towards carbon neutrality and its comparison to renewable power. Fundamental Research, 4 (4), 916, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre....
7.
YUAN P., MA H., SHEN B., JI Z. Abatement of NO/SO₂/Hg⁰ from flue gas by advanced oxidation processes (AOPs): Tech-category, status quo and prospects. Science of the Total Environment, 806, 150958, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
8.
AO R., MA L., DAI Q., GUO Z., LIU H., LI W. Promotional effect of acetic acid on simultaneous NO and Hg⁰ oxidation over LaCoO₃ perovskite. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47 (6), 3741, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhy....
9.
LIU Y., SHI S., WANG Y. Removal of pollutants from gas streams using Fenton (-like)-based oxidation systems: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 416, 125927, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhaz....
10.
GEORGE A., SHEN B., KANG D., YANG J., LUO J. Emission control strategies of hazardous trace elements from coal-fired power plants in China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 93, 66, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.....
11.
WAN Q., YAO Q., DUAN L., LI X., ZHANG L., HAO J. Comparison of elemental mercury oxidation across vanadium and cerium based catalysts in coal combustion flue gas: catalytic performances and particulate matter effects. Environmental Science & Technology, 52 (5), 2981, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.es....
12.
HARDYANTI N., SUSANTO H., KUSUMA F.A., BUDIHARDJO M.A. A bibliometric review of adsorption treatment with an adsorbent for wastewater. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 32 (2), 981, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes....
13.
PAULINO J., SILVA A., SANTOS D., NAGLIATE P., MEILI L. Hotspots and trends of layered double hydroxide-based adsorbents for polluted water treatment: insights from bibliometric analysis. Environmental Management, 71 (5), 1098, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267....
14.
GAO J., HUANG X., ZHANG L. Comparative analysis between international research hotspots and national-level policy keywords on artificial intelligence in China from 2009 to 2018. Sustainability, 11 (23), 6574, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su1123....
15.
KAO X., WANG W., KAO Q., ZHANG J. Visualization of energy-environment-economy system research characteristics and hotspots evolution trends based on CiteSpace. Environmental Research Communications, 4 (5), 055004, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7....
16.
GRUSS A.F. Mercury removal from simulated coal-fired power plant flue gas using UV irradiation and silica-titania composites, 2011.
17.
LIU Z. Heterogeneous catalytic elemental mercury oxidation in coal combustion flue gas, 2017.
18.
BISSON T.M., XU Z., GUPTA R., MAHAM Y., LIU Y., YANG H., CLARK I., PATEL M. Chemical-mechanical bromination of biomass ash for mercury removal from flue gases. Fuel, 108, 54, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel....
19.
PUDASAINEE D., SEO Y.C., SUNG J.H., JANG H.N., GUPTA R. Mercury co-beneficial capture in air pollution control devices of coal-fired power plants. International Journal of Coal Geology, 170, 48, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal....
20.
LEE W., BAE G.N. Removal of elemental mercury (Hg⁰) by nanosized V₂O₅/TiO₂ catalysts. Environmental Science & Technology, 43 (5), 1522, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es8024....
21.
PUDASAINEE D., KIM J.H., YOON Y.S., SEO Y.C. Oxidation, reemission and mass distribution of mercury in bituminous coal-fired power plants with SCR, CS-ESP and wet FGD. Fuel, 93 (1), 312, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel....
22.
PUDASAINEE D., LEE S.J., LEE S.-H., KIM J.H., JANG H.N., CHO S.J., SEO Y.C. Effect of selective catalytic reactor on oxidation and enhanced removal of mercury in coal-fired power plants. Fuel, 89 (4), 804, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel....
23.
BARNEA Z., SACHS T., CHIDAMBARAM M., SASSON Y. A novel oxidative method for the absorption of Hg⁰ from flue gas of coal fired power plants using task specific ionic liquid scrubber. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 244, 495, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhaz....
24.
ZHANG Y., YOU X., HUANG S., WANG M., DONG J. Knowledge atlas on the relationship between water management and constructed wetlands: a bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace. Sustainability, 14 (14), 8288, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su1414....
25.
MELAKU A., IVARS J.P., SAHLE M. The state-of-the-art and future research directions on sacred forests and ecosystem services. Environmental Management, 71 (6), 1255, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267....
26.
XU W., HUSSAIN A., LIU Y. A review on modification methods of adsorbents for elemental mercury from flue gas. Chemical Engineering Journal, 346, 692, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.....
27.
ZHOU Q., DUAN Y.F., HONG Y.G., ZHU C., SHE M., ZHANG J., WEI H.Q. Experimental and kinetic studies of gas-phase mercury adsorption by raw and bromine modified activated carbon. Fuel Processing Technology, 134, 325, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fupr....
28.
LIU X., JIANG S., LI H., YANG J., YANG Z., ZHAO J., PENG H., SHIH K. Elemental mercury oxidation over manganese oxide octahedral molecular sieve catalyst at low flue gas temperature. Chemical Engineering Journal, 356, 142, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.....
29.
GUAN Y., LIU Y., LV Q., WU J. Bismuth-based photocatalyst for photocatalytic oxidation of flue gas mercury removal: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 418, 126280, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhaz....
30.
MA Y., MU B., ZHANG X., YUAN D., MA C., XU H., QU Z., FANG S. Graphene enhanced Mn-Ce binary metal oxides for catalytic oxidation and adsorption of elemental mercury from coal-fired flue gas. Chemical Engineering Journal, 358, 1499, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.....
31.
LIU K., LIANG J., ZHANG N., LI G., XUE J., ZHAO K., LI Y., YU F. Global perspectives for biochar application in the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil: a bibliometric analysis over the past three decades. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 25 (8), 1052, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1080/152265....
32.
OUYANG W., WANG Y., LIN C., HE M., HAO F., LIU H., ZHU W. Heavy metal loss from agricultural watershed to aquatic system: A scientometrics review. Science of the Total Environment, 637, 208, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
33.
DOU Z., WANG Y., LIU Y., ZHAO Y., HUANG R. Enhanced adsorption of gaseous mercury on activated carbon by a novel clean modification method. Separation and Purification Technology, 308, 122885, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepp....
34.
LIU Y., WANG Q. Removal of elemental mercury from flue gas by thermally activated ammonium persulfate in a bubble column reactor. Environmental Science & Technology, 48 (20), 12181, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es5019....
35.
ZHENG J.R., YUAN C.S., IE I.R., SHEN H. S-scheme heterojunction CeO₂/TiO₂ modified by reduced graphene oxide (rGO) as charge transfer route for integrated photothermal catalytic oxidation of Hg⁰. Fuel, 343, 127973, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel....
36.
ZHOU C., SONG Z., YANG H., WU H., WANG B., YU J., SUN L. Insight into elemental mercury (Hg⁰) removal from flue gas using UV/H₂O₂ advanced oxidation processes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25 (21), 21097, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
37.
OCHEDI F.O., LIU Y., HUSSAIN A. A review on coal fly ash based adsorbents for mercury and arsenic removal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 267, 122143, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
38.
LI C., DUAN Y., TANG H., ZHU C., ZHENG Y., HUANG T. Mercury emissions monitoring in a coal-fired power plant by using the EPA method 30B based on a calcium-based sorbent trap. Fuel, 221, 171, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel....
39.
ZHANG S., ZHANG Q., ZHAO Y., YANG J., XU Y., ZHANG J. Enhancement of CeO₂ modified commercial SCR catalyst for synergistic mercury removal from coal combustion flue gas. RSC Advances, 10 (42), 25325, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA04....
40.
MA Y., WANG J., ZHANG X., ZHANG X., MU B., ZHANG H. Enhancement of Hg⁰ oxidation removal in chloride-free flue gas over FeOCl-modified commercial selective catalytic reduction catalyst. Colloid and Interface Science Communications, 44, 100472, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colc....
41.
BYUN Y., KIM J., SHIN D. Reaction of SO₂ with sodium chlorate powder triggering oxidation of NO and Hg⁰. Chemical Engineering Journal, 189, 5, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.....
42.
FANG P., CEN C.P., TANG Z.J. Experimental study on the oxidative absorption of Hg⁰ by KMnO₄ solution. Chemical Engineering Journal, 198, 95, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.....
43.
ZHAO S., QU Z., YAN N., LI Z., ZHU W., PAN J., XU J., LI M. Ag-modified AgI-TiO₂ as an excellent and durable catalyst for catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury. RSC Advances, 5 (39), 30841, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA00....
44.
FENG L., VAN HULLEBUSCH E.D., RODRIGO M.A., ESPOSITO G., OTURAN M.A. Removal of residual anti-inflammatory and analgesic pharmaceuticals from aqueous systems by electrochemical advanced oxidation processes: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 228, 944, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.....
45.
LIU Y., ZHOU J., ZHANG Y., PAN J., WANG Q., ZHANG J. Removal of Hg⁰ and simultaneous removal of Hg⁰/SO₂/NO in flue gas using two Fenton-like reagents in a spray reactor. Fuel, 145, 180, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel....
46.
WANG Z.H., JIANG S.D., ZHU Y.Q., ZHOU J.S., ZHOU J.H., LI Z.S., CEN K.F. Investigation on elemental mercury oxidation mechanism by non-thermal plasma treatment. Fuel Processing Technology, 91 (11), 1395, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fupr....
47.
WU J., LI C., CHEN X., ZHANG J., ZHAO L., HUANG T., HU T., ZHANG C., NI B., ZHOU X., LIANG P., ZHANG W. Photocatalytic oxidation of gas-phase Hg⁰ by carbon spheres supported visible-light-driven CuO-TiO₂. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 46, 416, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec....
48.
ZHAO Y., MA X., XU P., WANG H., LIU Y., HE A. Elemental mercury removal from flue gas by CoFe₂O₄ catalyzed peroxymonosulfate. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 341, 228, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhaz....
49.
JI M., LI H., HU K., HU J. Effects of chlorine addition on nitrogen oxide reduction and mercury oxidation over selective catalytic reduction catalysts. ACS Omega, 7 (14), 12098, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsome....
50.
ZHAO S., PUDASAINEE D., DUAN Y., GUPTA R., LIU M., LU J. A review on mercury in coal combustion process: content and occurrence forms in coal, transformation, sampling methods, emission and control technologies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 73, 26, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs....
51.
LUO J., NIU Q., XIA Y., CAO Y., DU R., SUN S., LU C. Investigation of gaseous elemental mercury oxidation by non-thermal plasma injection method. Energy & Fuels, 31 (10), 11013, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.en....
52.
LIU Y., ADEWUYI Y.G. A review on removal of elemental mercury from flue gas using advanced oxidation process: chemistry and process. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 112, 199, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cher....
53.
LIU Z., SRIRAM V., LEE J.-Y. Heterogeneous oxidation of elemental mercury vapor over RuO₂/rutile TiO₂ catalyst for mercury emissions control. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 207, 143, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apca....
54.
DONG S., WANG J., LI C., LIU H., GAO Z., WU C., YANG W. Simultaneous catalytic oxidation mechanism of NO and Hg⁰ over single-atom iron catalyst. Applied Surface Science, 609, 155298, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsu....
55.
MA Y., WANG J., ZHANG X., GU W., HAN L., LI Y. Mercury removal from flue gas by a MoS₂/H₂O heterogeneous system based on its absorption kinetics. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30 (11), 29043, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
56.
ZHAO Y., HAO R., QI M. Integrative process of preoxidation and absorption for simultaneous removal of SO₂, NO and Hg⁰. Chemical Engineering Journal, 269, 159, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.....
57.
SHEN B., ZHU S., ZHANG X., CHI G., PATEL D., SI M., WU C. Simultaneous removal of NO and Hg⁰ using Fe and Co co-doped Mn-Ce/TiO₂ catalysts. Fuel, 224, 241, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel....
58.
JU F. Mapping the knowledge structure of image recognition in cultural heritage: A scientometric analysis using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix. Journal of Imaging, 10 (11), 272, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jimagi....