ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Technical Knowledge Base and R&D Investment
Leap: The Moderating Role of Environment Shock
More details
Hide details
1
School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan)
No. 68 Jincheng Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430070, China
Submission date: 2023-09-06
Final revision date: 2023-10-13
Acceptance date: 2023-11-23
Online publication date: 2024-02-23
Publication date: 2024-04-09
Corresponding author
Ying Chen
School of Economics and management, China University of Geosciences(Wuhan), 430074, Wuhan, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2024;33(3):3325-3335
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
R&D investment leap is the behavior of an organization to significantly increase or decrease R&D
investment in a specific period. Existing literature on R&D investment leap does not pay enough
attention to the antecedents. This paper analyzes and tests the knowledge base antecedents of R&D
investment leap based on the Punctuated Equilibrium payoff and risk perspective, using a panel data
of Chinese listed companies from 2009-2018 as a sample. The results show that technical knowledge
base has an opposite effect on R&D investment leap in different directions. Technical diversity
and technical complexity have significant positive effects on upward R&D investment leap from
exploitation to exploration, technical diversity has significant negative effects on downward R&D
investment leap from exploration to exploitation, but technical complexity does not have significant
negative effects on downward R&D investment leap. Moreover, environment shock moderate their
relationship. When environment shock is advantage, organizations with stronger technical knowledge
base are more likely to carry out upward R&D investment; otherwise, organizations with stronger
technical knowledge base will slow down the downward R&D investment leap. The results help to
enrich and deepen the theoretical study of R&D investment volatility, and have implications for R&D
investment decisions in the VUCA environment.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.