About the Journal
In Memory of Professor Jerzy Radecki
Ownership and Management Statement
Editorial Office
Editorial Board
Scope
Impact Factor
Indexed by
Journal Impact Factor contributing items
Publication Frequency
Revenue Sources & Business Model
Contact
Subscription
Current issue
Online first
Instructions for Authors
Copyright & Licensing
Publication Fees
Editorial policies
Publication Policy Overview
Peer Review Policy
Research Ethics and Malpractice Policy
Plagiarism Policy
Conflict of Interest Policy
Open Access Policy
Instructions for Reviewers
Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies Policy
Advertising Policy
Direct Marketing & Manuscript Solicitation
Digital Archiving and Preservation Policy
CrossMark, Correction, and Retraction Policy
Archive
Publication Fees
Copyright & Licensing
Editorial policies
Publication Policy Overview
Peer Review Policy
Research Ethics and Malpractice Policy
Plagiarism Policy
Conflict of Interest Policy
Open Access Policy
Instructions for Reviewers
Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies Policy
Advertising Policy
Direct Marketing & Manuscript Solicitation
Digital Archiving and Preservation Policy
CrossMark, Correction, and Retraction Policy
eISSN: 2083-5906
ISSN: 1230-1485
ISSN: 1230-1485
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Towards a Sustainable Environment:
Understanding Chinese Farmers’
Adoption of Renewable Energy Sources
Through Green Intentions
1
School of Logistics, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610103, China
2
School of Journalism and Communication, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
3
School of Banking and Finance, University of International Business and Economics; Beijing, 100029, China
4
School of Business Administration and Customs Affairs, Shanghai Customs College, Shanghai 201204, China
5
Department of Economics, Division of management and Administrative Science,
University of Education Lahore, Pakistan
Submission date: 2024-01-05
Final revision date: 2024-03-01
Acceptance date: 2024-04-08
Online publication date: 2024-07-19
Publication date: 2025-01-09
Corresponding author
Qi Gao
School of School of Business Administration and Customs Affairs, Shanghai Customs College, Shanghai, China, China
School of School of Business Administration and Customs Affairs, Shanghai Customs College, Shanghai, China, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(2):1425-1437
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Renewable energy is absolutely necessary in order to stop the deterioration of the environment and
to guarantee reliable access to environmentally friendly energy sources. Based on the conformity theory,
logistic regression, propensity score matching, and stepwise regression are all used in the current study
to investigate the mediating role of green intentions in the conformity tendencies of Chinese farmers’
adoption of renewable energy sources. This research was motivated by the notion of the dissemination
of innovations as well as the technological adoption model, and it aims to shed light on how individuals
are socialized and how green intentions mediate their conformity tendencies to adopt renewable energy
sources. The results revealed that the average age of the farmers was 42 years, and they were primary
school graduates. More than 50% were male. Almost 26% of farmers reported that they use renewable
energy sources on their farms. Generally, the farmers were green intended and would like to adopt
renewable energy sources. The regression results disclosed a significant impact of socially inspired peer
adoption (p<0.01) on the farmers’ adoption of renewable energy sources. Renewable energy adoption
is impacted more by the adoption of strong connections than by the adoption of renewable energy by
weak relations, which means that farmers are more likely to adopt renewable energy if their peers also
do so. Nevertheless, the extent to which farmers have green intentions regarding the use of renewable
energy technology had a significant influence on the farmers’ conformity tendencies, influenced by the
different intensities of their social networks.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (78)
1.
ESPINOZA V.S., FONTALVO J., MARTÍ-HERRERO J., MIGUEL L.J., MEDIAVILLA M. Analysis of energy future pathways for Ecuador facing the prospects of oil availability using a system dynamics model. Is degrowth inevitable? *Energy*, 259, 124963, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener...>.
2.
SHAHSAVARI A., AKBARI M. Potential of solar energy in developing countries for reducing energy-related emissions. *Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews*, 90, 275, 2018. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser...>.
3.
SURENDRA K.C., TAKARA D., HASHIMOTO A.G., KHANAL S.K. Biogas as a sustainable energy source for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. *Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews*, 31, 846, 2014. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser...>.
4.
SOVACOOL B.K. The political economy of energy poverty: A review of key challenges. *Energy for Sustainable Development*, 16 (3), 272, 2012. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd....>.
5.
BAILIS R., DRIGO R., GHILARDI A., MASERA O. The carbon footprint of traditional wood-fuels. *Nature Climate Change*, 5 (3), 266, 2015. <https://doi.org/10.1038/nclima...>.
6.
UPADHYAY A.K., SINGH A., KUMAR K., SINGH A. Impact of indoor air pollution from solid fuels on respiratory illness in children in India. *BMC Public Health*, 15 (1), 1, 2015. <https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889...> PMid:25884539 PMCid:PMC4397688.
7.
MITTER S.S., VEDANTHAN R., ISLAMI F., POURSHAMS A., KHADEMI H., KAMANGAR F., ABNET C.C., DAWSEY S.M., PHAROAH P.D., BRENNAN P., FUSTER V., BOFFETTA P., MALEKZADEH R. Household fuel use and cardiovascular disease mortality: Golestan cohort study. *Circulation*, 133 (24), 2360, 2016. <https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCUL...> PMid:27297340 PMCid:PMC4910632.
8.
GIELEN D., BOSHELL F., SAYGIN D., BAZILIAN M.D., WAGNER N., GORINI R. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. *Energy Strategy Reviews*, 24, 38, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr....>.
9.
BROWN P.R., O’SULLIVAN F.M. Spatial and temporal variation in the value of solar power across U.S. electricity markets. *Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews*, 121, 109594, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser...>.
10.
LI L., ZHOU J. Application of solar heating technology in rural buildings in Western Sichuan Plateau. *Energy Reports*, 8, 295, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr...>.
11.
SAILOR D.J., ANAND J., KING R.R. Photovoltaics in the built environment: A critical review. *Energy and Buildings*, 253, 111479, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbu...>.
12.
SUN H., AWAN R.U., NAWAZ M.A., MOHSIN M., RASHEED A.K., IQBAL N. Assessing the socio-economic viability of solar commercialization in South Asia. *Environment, Development and Sustainability*, 23, 9875, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668...>.
13.
National Bureau of Statistics. Main Data Bulletin of the Third National Agricultural Census of National, China Statistics Press, Beijing, 2017.
14.
LI Y., QING C., GUO S., DENG X., SONG J., XU D. When my friends and relatives go solar, should I go solar too? Rural Sichuan evidence. *Renewable Energy*, 203, 753, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene...>.
15.
TAELE B.M., MOKHUTŠOANE L., HAPAZARI I., TLALI S.B., SENATLA M. Electrification challenges and photovoltaic progress in Lesotho. *Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews*, 16 (1), 973, 2012. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser...>.
16.
ABD ELBAR A.R., YOUSEF M.S., HASSAN H. 4E evaluation of solar still with photovoltaic panel. *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 233, 665, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...>.
17.
AWAN A.B., ZUBAIR M., MOULI K.V.C. Solar tower vs. photovoltaic power plants design & optimization. *Energy*, 199, 117450, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener...>.
18.
MANJU S., SAGAR N. Solar photovoltaic systems in India: Status and barriers. *Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews*, 70, 298, 2017. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser...>.
19.
LI A., XU Y., SHIROYAMA H. Solar lobby and energy transition in Japan. *Energy Policy*, 134, 110950, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo...>.
20.
NAG S.K., GANGOPADHYAY T.K., PASERBA J. Solar Photovoltaics: A Brief History. *IEEE Power and Energy Magazine*, 20 (3), 77, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1109/MPE.20...>.
21.
HAYAT M.B., ALI D., MONYAKE K.C., ALAGHA L., AHMED N. Solar energy: power generation challenges & future. *International Journal of Energy Research*, 43 (3), 1049, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1002/er.425...>.
22.
CHEN Y., CHEN Z., CHEN Z., YUAN X. Dynamic modeling of solar-assisted ground source heat pump using Modelica. *Applied Thermal Engineering*, 196, 117324, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appl...>.
23.
ZHONG Q., TONG D. Spatial layout optimization for PV installation. *Renewable Energy*, 150, 1, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene...>.
24.
HOSSAIN R., AHMED A.J., ISLAM S.M.K.N., SAHA N., DEBNATH P., KOUZANI A.Z., MAHMUD M.P. PV–thermal hybrid system design. *International Journal of Photoenergy*, 1–6, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8...>.
25.
YADAV P., DAVIES P.J., SARKODIE S.A. Decentralised solar energy in rural communities. *Energy Strategy Reviews*, 26, 100424, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr....>.
26.
JAN I., ULLAH W., ASHFAQ M. Social acceptability of photovoltaic systems in Pakistan. *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 274, 123140, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...>.
27.
ELAHI E., KHALID Z., ZHANG Z. Farmers’ willingness to install renewable technology. *Applied Energy*, 309, 118459, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apen...>.
28.
WANG X., GUAN Z., WU F. Solar adoption in rural China. *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 168, 1312, 2017. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...>.
29.
KETLOGETSWE C., MOTHUDI T.H. Solar home systems in Botswana. *Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews*, 13 (6–7), 1675, 2009. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser...>.
30.
GAO S., GREBITUS C., SCHMITZ T. Risk preferences & social networks in genomics adoption. *Journal of Rural Studies*, 94, 111, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrur...>.
31.
TANKO M. Risk preference, culture & religion in rice variety adoption. *Land Use Policy*, 115, 106040, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land...>.
32.
MENGISTU M.G., SIMANE B., ESHETE G., WORKNEH T.S. Factors affecting biogas technology adoption. *Renewable Energy*, 93, 215, 2016. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene...>.
33.
AKER J.C. Dial “A” for agriculture: ICTs for agricultural extension. *Agricultural Economics*, 42 (6), 631, 2011. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574...>.
34.
BANERJEE A. A simple model of herd behavior. *Quarterly Journal of Economics*, 107, 1992. <https://doi.org/10.2307/211836...>.
35.
SACERDOTE B. Experimental and quasi-experimental analysis of peer effects: two steps forward? *Annual Review of Economics*, 6 (1), 253–272, 2014. <https://doi.org/10.1146/annure...>.
36.
SHEN X.L., ZHANG K.Z., ZHAO S.J. Herd behavior in consumers' adoption of online reviews. *Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology*, 67 (11), 2754, 2016. <https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23...>.
37.
BREWER A.J., SAUNDERS R., FEARON P., FONAGY P., COTTRELL D., KRAAM A., PILLING S., SIMES E., ANOKHINA A., BUTLER S. Anti-social cognition as a mediator of peer influence and peer selection effects in antisocial adolescents. *European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry*, 31 (1), 177, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787...> PMid:33330952 PMCid:PMC8816781.
38.
KIM M.H., GIM T.H.T. Spatial characteristics of the diffusion of residential solar photovoltaics in urban areas: Seoul, South Korea. *International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health*, 18 (2), 644, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph...> PMid:33451153 PMCid:PMC7828634.
39.
KRISHNAN P., PATNAM M. Neighbors and extension agents in Ethiopia: Who matters more for technology adoption? *American Journal of Agricultural Economics*, 96 (1), 308, 2014. <https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/a...>.
40.
MAERTENS A. Who cares what others think? Social learning & social pressures in cotton farming in India. *American Journal of Agricultural Economics*, 99 (4), 988, 2017. <https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/a...>.
41.
ZENG Y., ZHANG J., HE K. Conformity tendencies & willingness to adopt crop-straw energy: Evidence from rural China. *Renewable Energy*, 138, 573, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene...>.
42.
LAN H., CHENG B., GOU Z., YU R. Evaluation of feed‑in tariffs promoting household solar adoption in Queensland, Australia. *Sustainable Cities and Society*, 53, 101942, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs....>.
43.
COIBION O., GORODNICHENKO Y., KAMDAR R. Expectations, inflation & the Phillips curve. *Journal of Economic Literature*, 56 (4), 1447, 2018. <https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20...>.
44.
WOLSKE K.S., GILLINGHAM K.T., SCHULTZ P.W. Peer influence on household energy behaviours. *Nature Energy*, 5 (3), 202, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560...>.
45.
TAN Q., ZHAN Y., GAO S., FAN W., CHEN J., ZHONG Y. Kinship effects on self–other overlap. *Personality and Individual Differences*, 73, 2015. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid...>.
46.
GRANOVETTER M. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. *Sociological Theory*, 1, 201, 1983. <https://doi.org/10.2307/202051>.
47.
WEENIG M.W., MIDDEN C.J. Communication network influences on diffusion & persuasion. *Journal of Personality and Social Psychology*, 61 (5), 734, 1991. <https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-...>.
48.
ZHANG Y., QIU C., ZHANG J. Strong vs weak ties on online medical consultation behavior. *Healthcare*, 10 (6), 977, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.3390/health...> PMid:35742028 PMCid:PMC9222327.
49.
GEE L.K., JONES J., BURKE M. Strong ties & job finding on Facebook. *Journal of Labor Economics*, 35 (2), 485, 2017. <https://doi.org/10.1086/686225>.
50.
HU H.H., WANG L., JIANG L., YANG W. Strong vs weak ties in word‑of‑mouth marketing. *BRQ Business Research Quarterly*, 22 (4), 245, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq....>.
51.
KRÄMER N.C., SAUER V., ELLISON N. Strong ties & online social support. *Social Media + Society*, 7 (2), 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1177/205630...>.
52.
FEI H.T., FEI X., HAMILTON G.G., ZHENG W. *From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society*. Univ. of California Press, 1992. <https://doi.org/10.1525/978052...>.
53.
QING C., HE J., GUO S., ZHOU W., DENG X., XU D. Peer effects on biogas adoption in Sichuan, China. *Environmental Science and Pollution Research*, 29 (40), 61488, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356...> PMid:35445303.
54.
BIAN Y., LI Y. Social network capital of Chinese urban families. *Tsinghua Sociological Review*, 2, 1, 2001.
55.
ROGERS E.M., SINGHAL A., QUINLAN M.M. Diffusion of innovations. In *Communication Theory & Research*, Routledge, 432, 2014.
56.
DAVIS F.D. Perceived usefulness, ease of use & IT acceptance. *MIS Quarterly*, 13 (3), 319, 1989. <https://doi.org/10.2307/249008>.
57.
SULAIMAN J., AZMAN A., SABOORI B. Solar energy development in Sabah: Trudgill’s perception. *Int. J. Sustainable Energy & Environmental Research*, 3 (2), 90, 2014.
59.
HUNECKE C., ENGLER A., JARA-ROJAS R., POORTVLIET P.M. Social capital & irrigation technology adoption. *Agricultural Systems*, 153, 221, 2017. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy...>.
60.
DESPOTOVIĆ J., RODIĆ V., CARACCIOLO F. Farmers' environmental awareness: measurement & use. *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 295, 126378, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...>.
61.
FARZANEH H., DASHTI M., ZUSMAN E., LEE S.Y., DAGVADORJ D., NIE Z. Solar electricity co-benefits in Mongolia. *IJERPH*, 19 (11), 6931, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph...> PMid:35682514 PMCid:PMC9180112.
62.
CHEN H., CHEN W. Household solar PV impacts from a subnational model. *Applied Energy*, 303, 117616, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apen...>.
63.
BANDIERA O., RASUL I. Social networks & technology adoption in Mozambique. *Economic Journal*, 116 (514), 869, 2006. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468...>.
64.
XU L., WANG Y., SOLANGI Y.A., ZAMEER H., SHAH S.A.A. Off‑grid solar PV feasibility in Sindh, Pakistan. *Processes*, 7 (5), 308, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7050...>.
65.
JAYARAMAN K., PARAMASIVAN L., KIUMARSI S. Low purchase penetration of PV systems in Malaysia. *Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews*, 80, 562, 2017. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser...>.
66.
IRFAN M., ELAVARASAN R.M., HAO Y., FENG M., SAILAN D. Willingness to utilize solar energy in China. *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 292, 126008, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...>.
67.
WANG C., SHUAI J., DING L., LU Y., CHEN J. Solar PV project evaluation with grey relation projection. *Energy*, 238, 121654, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener...>.
68.
ANENBERG S.C., HENZE D.K., LACEY F., et al. Health & climate benefits of clean cookstove programs in Mozambique. *Environmental Research Letters*, 12 (2), 025006, 2017. <https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9...>.
69.
HU Y., HUANG W., WANG J., CHEN S., ZHANG J. Renewable energy development in Sichuan, China. *Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews*, 57, 1373, 2016. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser...>.
71.
NATIONAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION. PV Construction & Operation Report — Q1–Q3 2022 (Chinese).
72.
HEIMAN A., LOWENGART O. Health hazard information & consumer demand. *International Journal of Research in Marketing*, 25 (4), 310, 2008. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijre...>.
73.
ROSENBAUM P.R., RUBIN D.B. The central role of the propensity score. *Biometrika*, 70 (1), 41, 1983. <https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet...> PMCid:PMC12925047.
74.
BARON R.M., KENNY D.A. The moderator–mediator distinction. *Journal of Personality and Social Psychology*, 51 (6), 1173, 1986. <https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-...> PMid:3806354.
75.
BUSIC-SONTIC A., FUERST F. Personality & neighbor influence on solar panel diffusion. *Energy and Buildings*, 158, 1275, 2018. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbu...>.
76.
AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior: unresolved issues. *Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes*, 1985.
77.
SHAHBAZ P., HAQ S.U., ABBAS A., BATOOL Z., ALOTAIBI B.A., NAYAK R.K. Women’s involvement, empowerment, and CSA adoption. *Agriculture*, 12, 1161, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.3390/agricu...> PMCid:PMC11723601.
78.
HAQ S.U., BOZ I., SHAHBAZ P. Climate-smart agriculture adoption & nutritional outcomes in Pakistan. *Food Security*, 13, 913, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571...>.
CITATIONS (1):
1.
Determinants of green energy adoption for sustainable agriculture development in district Swabi, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
Arshad Ullah Jadoon, Yan Yunxian, Liu Chao
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Arshad Ullah Jadoon, Yan Yunxian, Liu Chao
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2083-5906 |
| ISSN: | 1230-1485 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
