About the Journal
In Memory of Professor Jerzy Radecki
Editorial Office
Editorial Board
Scope
Impact Factor
Indexed in...
Journal Impact Factor contributing items
Contact
Subscription
Current issue
Online first
Notes to Authors
Frequently Asked Questions
Editorial policies
PJOES Publication Policy Overview
PJOES Peer Review Policy
PJOES Research Ethics and Malpractice Policy
PJOES Plagiarism Policy
PJOES Conflict of Interest Policy
PJOES Open Access Policy
PJOES Instructions for Reviewers
Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies Policy
Archive
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Bibliometric Analysis of Biological Pretreatments
in Biogas Processes
1
Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Sutculer Prof. Dr. Hasan Gurbuz Vocational School, Isparta/Türki̇y
Submission date: 2024-02-06
Final revision date: 2024-03-01
Acceptance date: 2024-04-08
Online publication date: 2024-06-17
Publication date: 2025-01-09
Corresponding author
Rıfat Yıldırım
Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Sutculer Prof. Dr. Hasan Gurbuz Vocational School, Isparta/Türki̇y
Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Sutculer Prof. Dr. Hasan Gurbuz Vocational School, Isparta/Türki̇y
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(2):1439-1443
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study is to present the time dynamics of biological pretreatment studies used for
biogas processes in a systematic and comprehensive manner. The data obtained from the research articles
is illustrated using a visual mapping approach. In this study, it was understood that bioinformatics
studies on microorganisms used in systems/processes where microorganisms are used in biogas have
recently increased. However, the genetic studies used are generally for the detection of microorganisms
in the consortium and controlled gene exchange with cloning processes in biogas fields. Therefore,
it is concluded that studies on cloning processes, which are required by biological pre-treatments used
in biogas, should be given importance, and studies on these issues should be increased. However,
genetic studies in biogas processes are not used for controlled gene exchange with cloning processes.
It is understood that it is generally used for the species identification of microorganisms. Therefore,
it is concluded that studies on cloning processes, which are required by biological pre-treatments used
in biogas processes, should be given importance, and studies on these issues should be increased.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
JAYAKUMAR M., KARMEGAM N., GUNDUPALLI M.P., BIZUNEH GEBEYEHU K., TESSEMA ASFAW B., CHANG S.W. Heterogeneous base catalysts: Synthesis and application for biodiesel production-A review. *Bioresource Technology*, 331, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bior...> PMid:33832828.
2.
DUAN Y., TARAFDAR A., KUMAR V., GANESHAN P., RAJENDRAN K., GIRI B.S., GÓMEZ-GARCÍA R., LI H., ZHANG Z., SINDHU R., BINOD P., PANDEY A., TAHERZADEH M.J., SARSAIYA S., JAIN A., AWASTHI M.K. Sustainable biorefinery approaches towards circular economy for conversion of biowaste to value-added materials and future perspectives. *Fuel*, 325, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel...>.
3.
AMUSA A.A., AHMAD A.L., ADEWOLE J.K. Mechanism and compatibility of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass and polymeric mixed matrix membranes: A review. *Membranes*, 10 (12), 2020. <https://doi.org/10.3390/membra...> PMid:33255866 PMCid:PMC7760533.
4.
LU H., YADAV V., ZHONG M., BILAL M., TAHERZADEH M.J., IQBAL H.M.N. Bioengineered microbial platforms for biomass-derived biofuel production - A review. *Chemosphere*, 288 (2), 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chem...> PMid:34637864.
5.
KEE S.H., CHIONGSON J.B.V., SALUDES J.P., VIGNESWARI S., RAMAKRISHNA S., BHUBALAN K. Bioconversion of agro-industrial biowaste into biomaterials via microbial factories-A circular economy pathway. *Environmental Pollution*, 271, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envp...> PMid:33383425.
6.
GUPTE A.P., BASAGLIA M., CASELLA S., FAVARO L. Rice waste streams as promising biofuel sources: feedstocks, biotechnologies, and future perspectives. *Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews*, 167, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser...>.
7.
KAFLE G.K., CHEN L. Batch anaerobic digestion comparison of five livestock manures and BMP prediction using statistical models. *Waste Management*, 48, 492, 2016. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasm...> PMid:26531046.
8.
REN Y., YU M., WU C., WANG Q., GAO M., HUANG Q., LIU Y. Food waste anaerobic digestion: updates and tendencies. *Bioresource Technology*, 247, 1069, 2018. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bior...> PMid:28965913.
9.
MITRAKA G.C., KONTOGIANNOPOULOS K.N., TSIVINTZELIS I., ZOUBOULIS A.I., KOUGIAS P.G. Optimization of supercritical CO₂ explosion for sewage sludge pretreatment. *Chemosphere*, 297, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chem...> PMid:35181421.
10.
WAINAINA S., LUKITAWESA M.K., AWASTHI TAHERZADEH M.J. Bioengineering anaerobic digestion for VFAs, H₂, or CH₄: A critical review. *Bioengineered*, 10 (1), 437, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1080/216559...> PMid:31570035 PMCid:PMC6802927.
11.
LEE J.T.E., DUTTA N., ZHANG L., TSUI T.T.H., LIM S., KAI T.Z., LIM E.Y., JIACHEN S., ZHANG J., WANG C., OK Y.S., AHRING B.K., TONG Y.W. Bioaugmentation of *Methanosarcina thermophila* grown on biochar during thermophilic food waste anaerobic digestion. *Bioresource Technology*, 360, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bior...> PMid:35811056.
12.
KUMAR V., RAWAT J., PATIL R.C., BARIK C.R., PUROHIT S., JAISWAL H., FARTYAL N., GOUD V.V., KALAMDHAD A.S. Novel cellulolytic bacteria for anaerobic digestion of rice straw. *Renewable Energy*, 169, 485, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene...>.
13.
PRASERTSAN P. Enhanced biogas by co-digesting crude glycerol & ethanol with palm oil mill effluent. *Biomass and Bioenergy*, 148, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biom...>.
14.
TUKANGHAN W., HUPFAUF S., BRANDÓN M.G., INSAM H., SALVENMOSER W., PRASERTSAN P., CHEIRSILP B., THONG S. Bacteroides‑ and Clostridium‑rich methanogenic consortia enhance high-solid AD biogas. *Bioresource Technology Reports*, 14, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bite...>.
15.
YILDIRIM E., INCE O., AYDIN S., INCE B. Biogas improvement using rumen fungi. *Renewable Energy*, 109, 346, 2017. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene...>.
16.
CHRISTY P.M., GOPINATH L.R., DIVYA D. Anaerobic decomposition and biogas enhancement via enzymes and microbes. *Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews*, 34, 167, 2014. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser...>.
17.
WEIß S., TAUBER M., SOMITSCH W., MEINCKE R., MULLER H., BERG G., GUEBITZ G.M. Hemicellulolytic bacteria on zeolite to enhance biogas. *Water Research*, 44 (6), 1970, 2010. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watr...> PMid:20022352.
18.
GUN S., KILIÇ G.D. Bibliometric analysis of organic food marketing. *Journal of Gastronomy, Hospitality and Travel*, 5 (2), 785, 2022.
19.
OZGUR C. Bibliometric analysis of disinfection byproduct research in Türkiye. *Environmental Research and Technology*, 6 (3), 173, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1...>.
20.
MULLER H.W., TROSCH W. White‑rot fungi screening for wheat straw pretreatment in biogas. *Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology*, 24, 180, 1986. <https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0093...>.
21.
KAMINSKA K.H., BARANIAK U., BONIECKI M., NOWACZYK K., CZERWONIEC A., BUJNICKI J.M. Bioinformatics of hypermodified nucleoside ms2io6A37 biosynthesis enzymes. *Proteins*, 70 (1), 1, 2008. <https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.2...> PMid:17910062.
22.
WELANDER P.V., SUMMONS R.E. Discovery & diversity of 3‑methylhopanoid production gene. *PNAS*, 109 (32), 12905, 2012. <https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1...> PMid:22826256 PMCid:PMC3420191.
23.
WANG W\.G., LI R., LIU B., LI L., WANG S.H., CHEN F. LEA protein variants from *Pogonatherum paniceum* confer abiotic stress tolerance in *E. coli*. *Journal of Plant Physiology*, 169 (15), 1559, 2012. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplp...> PMid:22902206.
24.
LI P., WANG L., FENG L. Novel Rieske‑type alkane monooxygenase in *Pusillimonas* sp. T7‑7. *Journal of Bacteriology*, 195 (9), 2013. <https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.021...> PMid:23417490 PMCid:PMC3624578.
25.
YAN X., GENG A., ZHANG J., WEI Y., ZHANG L., CHANGLI Q., WANG Q., WANG S., ZHOU Z. Discovery of (hemi‑)cellulase genes from a biogas digester metagenome. *Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology*, 97 (18), 2013. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253...> PMid:23653123.
26.
KUMAR A.K., KUMAR R.S., YENNAWAR N.H., YENNAWAR H., FERRY J. Structural & biochemical characterization of a ferredoxin:thioredoxin reductase‑like enzyme from *Methanosarcina acetivorans*. *Biochemistry*, 54 (19), 2015. <https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bi...> PMid:25915695.
27.
DEMIDENKO A., AKBERDIN I., ALLEMANN M., ALLEN E.E., KALYUZHNAYA M.G. Fatty acid biosynthesis pathways in *Methylomicrobium buryatense* 5G(B1). *Frontiers in Microbiology*, 1 (7), 2017. <https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb....> PMid:28119683 PMCid:PMC5222806.
28.
STOYANCHEVA G., KABAIVANOVA L., HUBENOV V., CHORUKOVA E. Metagenomic analysis of bacteria, archaea & fungi in two‑stage anaerobic biodegradation of corn steep liquor. *Microorganisms*, 11 (5), 2023. <https://doi.org/10.3390/microo...> PMid:37317237 PMCid:PMC10223338.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2083-5906 |
| ISSN: | 1230-1485 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
