ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Understanding the Carbon Footprint of Chinese Agriculture: An Analysis of Consumption-Driven Environmental Impact
Nan Feng 1,2
,
 
Pei Xu 3
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Economics, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang, Anhui, 236041, China
 
2
School of Economics, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
 
3
Department of Construction Cost, School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Tongling University, Tongling 244061, China
 
 
Submission date: 2024-10-11
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-11-15
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-12-02
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-04-10
 
 
Publication date: 2026-01-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Pei Xu   

Department of Construction Cost, School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Tongling University, 1335 Cuihu 4th Road, Tongling City, Anhui Province, 244061, Tongling, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2026;35(1):601-616
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Agriculture is the link between sustainable development and human nutrition and health. Increasing carbon emissions from agriculture threaten ecosystems and human living conditions. However, the level of agricultural emissions in China and uncertainties in the global supply chain limit the implementation of more sustainable agricultural policies in China. This paper aims to assess the environmental impacts of Chinese agriculture from the perspective of consumption carbon emissions. This paper adopts a multi-regional environmental input-output model, uses the global supply chain to identify major trade partners and key industries, and estimates China’s domestic agricultural carbon emissions from the perspective of intermediate product input industries. Then, from the perspective of the country (region) and intermediate product input industry, we estimate the embodied carbon of China’s agriculture in international trade. Finally, based on the structural decomposition analysis, we factor out the changes in carbon emissions embodied in Chinese agriculture from the demand and supply sides. The findings underscore that energy supply, crop cultivation, livestock farming, machinery and equipment manufacturing, food production, and electrical equipment manufacturing are the primary drivers behind the growth in carbon emissions. According to the SDA decomposition results of the global supply chain, the major partners of China’s agricultural sector, which are also the top ten carbon emission sources, can be roughly divided into four categories: developed countries with a long geographical distance from China, BRIC countries, Asian neighbors and Taiwan region. The results of the factor decomposition analysis reveal that the surge in carbon emissions is primarily attributable to increased demand and decreased production emission efficiency. In contrast, advancements in industry-wide technology play a key role in reducing carbon emissions. Conclusively, this study provides scientific basis and policy recommendations for formulating sustainable agricultural development strategies and protecting the ecological environment, which is expected to provide an important reference for solving the problem of global climate change.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (38)
1.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Energy Statistical Yearbook, 2022.
 
2.
WORLD BANK. World Integrated Trade Solution, 2022.
 
3.
DONG W.Y. Revealing potential of energy-saving behind emission reduction: a dea-based empirical study. Management of Environmental Quality, 30 (4), 714, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07....
 
4.
ZHANG X., WU L., MA X., QIN Y. Dynamic computable general equilibrium simulation of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 345, 131122, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
5.
XUAN X., ZHANG F., DENG X.Z., BAI Y.P. Measurement and spatio-temporal transfer of greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural sources in China: A food trade perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 197, 107100, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resc....
 
6.
LIU M., YANG X., WEN J., WANG H., FENG Y., LU J., WANG J. Drivers of China's carbon dioxide emissions: Based on the combination model of structural decomposition analysis and input-output subsystem method. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 100, 107043, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
 
7.
REN X.C., HE J., HUANG Z.L. Innovation, natural resources abundance, climate change and green growth in agriculture. Resources Policy, 85, 103970, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso....
 
8.
FENG T., XIONG R.Y., HUAN P. Productive use of natural resources in agriculture: The main policy lessons. Resources Policy, 85, 103793, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso....
 
9.
HUAN S.H., LIU X.L. Network modeling and stability improvement of the water-energy-fertilizer-food nexus flows based on global agricultural trade. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 39, 480, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.....
 
10.
TIAN Q., YU Y., XU Y., LI C., LIU N. Patterns and driving factors of agricultural virtual water imports in China. Agricultural Water Management, 281, 108262, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwa....
 
11.
AMOAKO S., ANDOH F.K., ASMAH E.E. Structural change and energy use in Ghana's manufacturing and agriculture sectors. Energy Reports, 8, 11112, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr....
 
12.
WIEDMANN T., LENZEN M. Environmental and social footprints of international trade. Nature Geoscience, 11 (5), 314, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561....
 
13.
GUO Z.D., ZHANG X.N. Carbon reduction effect of agricultural green production technology: A new evidence from China. Science of The Total Environment, 874, 162483, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:36858221.
 
14.
HUANG L.Y., ZHAO X.L. Impact of financial development on trade-embodied carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from 30 provinces in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 721, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
15.
JI M., LI J., ZHANG M. What drives the agricultural carbon emissions for low-carbon transition? Evidence from China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 105, 107440, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
 
16.
JU H., ZENG G., ZHANG S. Inter-provincial flow and influencing factors of agricultural carbon footprint in China and its policy implication. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 105, 107419, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
 
17.
CHEN X., SHUAI C., ZHANG Y., WU Y. Decomposition of energy consumption and its decoupling with economic growth in the global agricultural industry. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 81, 106364, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
 
18.
CUI Y., KHAN S.U., SAUER J., ZHAO M. Exploring the spatiotemporal heterogeneity and influencing factors of agricultural carbon footprint and carbon footprint intensity: Embodying carbon sink effect. Science of The Total Environment, 846, 157507, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:35870582.
 
19.
LONG Y., YOSHIDA Y., LIU Q., ZHANG H., FANG K. Comparison of city-level carbon footprint evaluation by applying single- and multi-regional input-output tables. Journal of Environmental Management, 260, 110108, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:32090821.
 
20.
HAN Z., CHEN Y.H., SHI Y. To measure and decompose consumption-based carbon emission from the perspective of international final demand. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 35 (7), 114, 2018.
 
21.
FRANZEN A., MADER S. Consumption-based versus production-based accounting of CO2 emissions: is there evidence for carbon leakage? Environmental Science & Policy, 84, 34, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envs....
 
22.
FAN J.L., PAN X., LI J.Q. Production-based and consumption-based CO2 transfers among major economies: a flow chart analysis. Energy Procedia, 105, 3499, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyp....
 
23.
ROCCO M.V., GOLINUCCI N., RONCO S.M., COLOMBO E. Fighting carbon leakage through consumption-based carbon emissions policies: empirical analysis based on the world trade model with bilateral trades. Applied Energy, 274, 115301, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apen....
 
24.
HOU H., WANG J., YUAN M., LIANG S., LIU T., WANG H., XU H. Estimating the mitigation potential of the Chinese service sector using embodied carbon emissions accounting. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 86, 106510, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
 
25.
FENG W., CAI B., ZHANG B. A Bite of China: food consumption and carbon emission from 1992 to 2007. China Economic Review, 59, 100949, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chie....
 
26.
GUO J., ZHANG Y.J., ZHANG K.B. The key sectors for energy conservation and carbon emissions reduction in China: evidence from the input-output method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 180, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
27.
LÓPEZ L.A., ARCE G., JIANG X. Mapping China's flows of emissions in the world's carbon footprint: a network approach of production layers. Energy Economics, 87, 104739, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
28.
RADWAN A., HONGYUN H., ACHRAF A., MUSTAFA A.M. Energy use and energy-related carbon dioxide emissions drivers in Egypt's economy: focus on the agricultural sector with a structural decomposition analysis. Energy, 258, 124821, 2022a. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener....
 
29.
LIN B.Q., GUAN C.X. Assessing consumption-based carbon footprint of China's food industry in global supply chain. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35, 365, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.....
 
30.
JIANG T., LI S., YU Y., PENG Y. Energy-related carbon emissions and structural emissions reduction of China's construction industry: the perspective of input-output analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (26), 39515, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:35102513.
 
31.
HU J., WANG Z., HUANG Q., HU M. Agricultural trade shocks and carbon leakage: Evidence from China's trade shocks to the Belt & Road economies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 90, 106629, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
 
32.
ZHENG J., MI Z., COFFMAN D.M., SHAN Y., GUAN D., WANG S. The slowdown in China's carbon emissions growth in the new phase of economic development. One Earth, 1 (2), 240, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onee....
 
33.
LIU X.Y., XIN L.J. Spatial and temporal evolution and greenhouse gas emissions of China's agricultural plastic greenhouses. Science of The Total Environment, 863, 160810, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:36496028.
 
34.
MENG G., LIU H., LI J., SUN C. Determination of driving forces for China's energy consumption and regional disparities using a hybrid structural decomposition analysis. Energy, 239, 122191, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener....
 
35.
ZHAO H., MILLER T.R., ISHII N., KAWASAKI A. Global spatio-temporal change assessment in interregional water stress footprint in China by a high resolution MRIO model. Science of The Total Environment, 841, 156682, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:35710018.
 
36.
MA R., ZHENG X., ZHANG C., LI J., MA Y. Distribution of CO2 emissions in China's supply chains: A sub-national MRIO analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 345, 130986, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
37.
CORSATEA T.D., LINDNER S., ARTO I., ROMÁN M.V., RUEDA-CANTUCHE J.M., VELÁZQUEZ AFONSO A., NEUWAHL F. World input-output database environmental accounts. Update, 2016, 54, 2000.
 
38.
SHI R., YAO L., ZHAO M., YAN Z. Low-carbon production performance of agricultural green technological innovation: From multiple innovation subject perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 105, 107424, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top