ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Performance Evaluation of Water
Management in the Yellow River Basin
More details
Hide details
1
School of Public Administration, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264000, China
2
Dongying Luxing Water affairs limited company, Dongying 257000, China
3
Dongying Research Institute for Oceanography Development, Dongying 257000, China
4
Shandong Land Group digital technology limited company, Jinnan 250014, China
Submission date: 2024-09-07
Final revision date: 2024-11-25
Acceptance date: 2024-12-16
Online publication date: 2025-02-11
Publication date: 2026-01-30
Corresponding author
Beibei Chen
Shandong Land Group digital technology limited company, Jinnan 250014, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2026;35(1):1415-1426
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
On the basis of the “combined management of Three Waters”, this paper constructs a water
management performance evaluation system that includes three dimensions: the utilization of water
resources, water environment management, and the rehabilitation of water ecosystems. It evaluates
the water management performance of the Yellow River Basin from 2006 to 2022 using entropy weight
TOPSIS. This includes characterizing the dynamic evolution of water management performance
in the Yellow River Basin with the help of kernel density curves, exploring the differences in water
management performance between the upper, middle, and lower reaches of the Yellow River Basin with
the help of the Tyrell’s index, and assessing the development trend of the Yellow River Basin using
the GM (1,1) prediction model. The results show that the overall water management performance
of the Yellow River Basin shows a decreasing trend and then a stable upward trend, and the dimension
of the utilization of water resources of the Yellow River Basin shows a spatial pattern of strong
in the east and weak in the west. In contrast, the dimension of water environment management shows
a spatial pattern that is strong in the west and weak in the east. The kernel density curve shows
that the gap between the water management performance of the provinces in the basin continues
to increase over time and tends to stabilize. According to the model, the performance of water
management in the Yellow River Basin will continue to improve steadily in the coming years.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (29)
1.
WANG Y.J., WANG S.D., YANG S.T. Dynamic simulation of ecological water use process of vegetation in the Yellow River Basin. *Journal of Natural Resources*. 29 (3), 431, 2014.
2.
LIU H.J., QIAO L.C., SUN S.H. Spatial pattern and dynamic evolution of water use efficiency in the Yellow River Basin. *Resource Science*. 42 (1), 57, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.18402/resci....
3.
YANG D.W., LI C., NI G.H. Application of distributed hydrological modeling in the Yellow River Basin. *Acta Geographica Sinica*. 59 (1), 143, 2004.
4.
LIU C.M., ZHENG H.X. Trend analysis of water cycle elements in the Yellow River Basin. *Journal of Natural Resources*. 18 (2), 129, 2003.
5.
JIA S.F., LIANG Y. Study on the adjustment of water resources allocation strategy in the Yellow River Basin under the new situation. *Resource Science*. 42 (1), 29, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.18402/resci....
6.
LI S., ZHANG R.J., JIANG X.H. Research on the Legislation of Water Resources Saving and Intensive Utilization in Yellow River Basin. *People's Yellow River*. 44 (2), 65, 2022.
7.
XIANG W., QIN P. Exploration of the application of the concept of conservation and intensive utilization in the Yellow River water resources protection legislation. *Environmental Protection*. 48 (Z1), 47, 2020.
8.
REN B.P., DU Y.B. Water right market construction and water resource utilization in the Yellow River Basin. *Journal of Xi'an University of Finance and Economics*. 35 (1), 5, 2022.
9.
CHEN Y.P., LIU C. Water resource utilization efficiency and its spatial and temporal differentiation characteristics in the Yellow River Basin. *Statistics and Decision Making*. 38 (8), 62, 2022.
10.
MIAO J.Y. Analysis of coupled coordination between industrial water resources efficiency and economic development in the Yellow River Basin. *Industrial Technology and Economics*. 42 (9), 142, 2023.
11.
DENG C., JIANG X.H. Dynamic evolution and driving mechanism of green efficiency of agricultural water resources in the Yellow River Basin. *Economic Issues*. (9), 122, 2023 [In Chinese].
12.
LU Y.L., XU S.S., SI B.J. Characterization of the dynamic evolution of environmental carrying capacity of water resources in nine provinces (districts) of the Yellow River Basin. *People's Yellow River*. 43 (11), 103, 2021.
13.
HUANG C.S., GENG L.H., YAN B. Dynamic prediction and regulation of water resources carrying capacity – taking the Yellow River Basin as an example. *Advances in Water Science*. 32 (1), 59, 2021.
14.
ZUO Q.T., JIANG L., FENG Y.K. Spatial and temporal characterization of the ecological footprint of water resources in provinces and regions along the Yellow River. *Journal of Irrigation and Drainage*. 39 (10), 1, 2020.
15.
NING Y., LIU Y.L., DU J.Q. Assessment of sustainable development and synergistic development strategies in the Yellow River Basin. *Journal of Ecology*. 42 (3), 990, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb20....
16.
ZHANG Y.H. Research on water resources ecological compensation standard based on opportunity cost method and ecosystem service value accounting – Taking the Yellow River Basin as an example. *Journal of Irrigation and Drainage*. 42 (5), 108, 2023.
17.
MURATOGLU A., IRAZ E., ERCIN E. Water resources management of large hydrological basins in semi-arid regions: Spatial and temporal variability of water footprint of the Upper Euphrates River basin. *Science of the Total Environment*. 846, 157396, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
18.
KIMAMBO O.N., MBUNGU W., MASSAWE G.D., HAMAD A.A., LIGATE E.J. Rapid environmental flow assessment for sustainable water resource management in Tanzania's Lower Rufiji River Basin: A scoping review. *Heliyon*. 9 (11), e22509, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli....
19.
BILALOVA S., NEWIG J., TREMBLAY-LEVESQUE L.C., ROUX J., HERRON C., CRANE S. Pathways to water sustainability? A global study assessing the benefits of integrated water resources management. *Environmental Management*. 343 (1), 118179, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
20.
LIU S., CROSSMAN N.D., NOLAN M., GHIRMAY H. Bringing ecosystem services into integrated water resources management. *Environmental Management*. 129 (15), 92, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
21.
BODE H., EVERS P., ALBRECHT D.R. Integrated water resources management in the Ruhr River Basin, Germany. *Water Science and Technology*. 47 (7), 81, 2003.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.20....
22.
DELAVAR M., EINI M.R., KUCHAK V.S., ZAGHIYAN M.R., SHAHBAZI A., NOURMOHAMMADI F., MOTAMEDI A. Model-based water accounting for integrated assessment of water resources systems at the basin scale. *Science of the Total Environment*. 830 (15), 154810, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
23.
HUANG W.H., WANG M.D., GAO H.G. Measurement of water resources management performance level and spatial and temporal differentiation in the Yangtze River Basin. *Statistics and Decision Making*. 38 (20), 48, 2022.
24.
SUN K., ZHANG X.W., NIE J. Evaluation of provincial water resources utilization performance in China and its spatial differentiation and driving factor analysis. *Water Resources Conservation*. 39 (4), 186, 2023 [In Chinese].
25.
HUANG S., FENG Q., WANG X.B. Performance evaluation of integrated water resources management in Shiyang River Basin. *Desert China*. 41 (2), 67, 2021.
26.
WU D. Research on the evaluation method of water resources development level in river basins – taking the Huaihe River Basin as an example. *Resource Science*. 38 (7), 1323, 2016.
27.
ZHANG N.N., SU X.L., ZHOU Y.Z. Evaluation of water resources carrying capacity in the Yellow River Basin. *Journal of Natural Resources*. 34 (8), 1759, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyx....
28.
DING L., SHAO Z., ZHANG H., XU C., WU D. A comprehensive evaluation of urban sustainable development in China based on the TOPSIS-entropy method. *Sustainability*. 8 (8), 746, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080....