ORIGINAL RESEARCH
The Impact of the Carbon Emissions Trading Policy on the Corporate ESG Performance – Evidence from China
,
 
,
 
Kun Ya 2
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Economics and Management, Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin, China
 
2
School of Accounting, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, China
 
 
Submission date: 2024-06-24
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-08-10
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-10-07
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-01-27
 
 
Publication date: 2025-11-04
 
 
Corresponding author
Liyun Chen   

School of Economics and Management, Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(6):7921-7932
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Based on a sustainable development perspective, this study examines the impact of China’s carbon emissions trading policy on corporate environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) performance. Data from 845 listed companies in China from 2011 to 2020 are used, and differences-indifferences (DID) and triple-difference models are adopted. The empirical results show that implementing carbon emissions trading policies significantly enhanced corporate ESG performance. According to the triple-difference model, as internal drivers, two different corporate sustainability indicators focus on different moderating roles in the relationship between carbon emissions trading policy and corporate ESG performance. The external driving factor (i.e., the regional digital economy’s development level) positively moderates the relationship between carbon emissions trading policy and corporate ESG performance. Further analysis shows that larger companies and state-owned enterprises achieve more significant improvements in ESG performance under carbon emissions trading policy.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (34)
1.
HUANG S. ESG Concepts and Reconstruction of Corporate Reports. Finance and Accounting Monthly. 17, 3, 2021.
 
2.
COBBINAH P.B., ERDIAW-KWASIE M.O., AMOATENG P. Rethinking sustainable development within the framework of poverty and urbanisation in developing countries. Environmental Development. 13, 18, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envd....
 
3.
HUANG X., ZHANG X., LIU Y. Does China's Carbon Emissions Trading Policy Fulfill the Environmental Dividend? Economic Review, (06), 86, 2018.
 
4.
WANG X., HUANG J., LIU H. Can China's carbon trading policy help achieve Carbon Neutrality? - A study of policy effects from the Five-sphere Integrated Plan perspective. Journal of Environmental Management. 305, 114357, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:34954687.
 
5.
ZHANG Y., LI S., LUO T., GAO J. The effect of emission trading policy on carbon emission reduction: Evidence from an integrated study of pilot regions in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 265, 121843, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
6.
XUAN D., MA X., SHANG Y. Can China's policy of carbon emission trading promote carbon emission reduction? Journal of Cleaner Production. 270, 122383, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
7.
TANG G., SUN H., CHEN X. Carbon emissions trading system and corporate investment behavior. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics. 4, 57, 2022.
 
8.
ZHOU C., CAI H., LIU M. Micro-corporate financial effects of carbon emissions trading - PSM-DID test based on "Porter hypothesis". Collected Essays on Finance and Economics. 3, 68, 2020.
 
9.
YU P., HAO R., CAI Z., SUN Y., ZHANG X. Does emission trading system achieve the win-win of carbon emission reduction and financial performance improvement? - Evidence from Chinese A-share listed firms in industrial sector. Journal of Cleaner Production. 333, 130121, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
10.
ORTAS E., ÁLVAREZ I., GARAYAR A. The Environmental, Social, Governance, and Financial Performance Effects on Companies that Adopt the United Nations Global Compact. Sustainability. 7 (2), 1932, 2015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7021....
 
11.
ECCLES R.G., KASTRAPELI M.D., POTTER S.J. How to Integrate ESG into Investment Decision-Making: Results of a Global Survey of Institutional Investors. The Bank of America Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. 29 (4), 125, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.1....
 
12.
WANG K., LI T., SAN Z., GAO H. How does corporate ESG performance affect stock liquidity? Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 80, 102087, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacf....
 
13.
YAN Y., CHENG Q., HUANG M., LIN Q., LIN W. Government Environmental Regulation and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from Natural Resource Accountability Audits in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20 (1), 447, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid:36612766 PMCid:PMC9819325.
 
14.
LU Y., ABEYSEKERA I. Stakeholders' power, corporate characteristics, and social and environmental disclosure: evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 64, 426, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
15.
TAN Y., ZHU Z. The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and managers' environmental awareness. Technology in Society. 68, 101906, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
16.
DENG H., YIN R. Research on the functions and institutional structure of my country's carbon emissions trading under the vision of carbon neutrality. Northern Legal Science. 16 (2), 5, 2022.
 
17.
ZHANG Q. Re-examination of the relationship between environmental regulation, technological innovation and corporate performance under the framework of Porter's hypothesis. Communication of Finance and Accounting (Financing Version). 33, 58, 2018.
 
18.
HU J., PAN X., HUANG Q. Quantity or quality? The impacts of environmental regulation on firms' innovation - Quasi-natural experiment based on China's carbon emissions trading pilot. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 158, 120122, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
19.
YU H., JIANG Y., ZHANG Z., SHANG W.-L., HAN C., ZHAO Y. The impact of carbon emission trading policy on firms' green innovation in China. Financial Innovation. 8 (1), 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854....
 
20.
SHI B., FENG C., QIU M., EKELAND A. Innovation suppression and migration effect: The unintentional consequences of environmental regulation. China Economic Review. 49, 1, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chie....
 
21.
LI J., LIAN G., XU A. How do ESG affect the spillover of green innovation among peer firms? Mechanism discussion and performance study. Journal of Business Research. 158, 113648, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
 
22.
MOSKOVICS P., WANKE P., TAN Y., GERGED A.M. Market structure, ESG performance, and corporate efficiency: Insights from Brazilian publicly traded companies. Business Strategy and the Environment. 33 (2), 241, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.34....
 
23.
MENG-TAO C., DA-PENG Y., WEI-QI Z., QI-JUN W. How does ESG disclosure improve stock liquidity for enterprises - Empirical evidence from China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 98, 106926, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar... PMCid:PMC10954117.
 
24.
HUSTED B.W., SOUSA-FILHO J.M. The impact of sustainability governance, country stakeholder orientation, and country risk on environmental, social, and governance performance. Journal of Cleaner Production. 155, 93, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle... https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
25.
DING S., HU J. Environmental auditing, environmental information disclosure and corporate environmental performance. Ecological Economy. 38 (1), 162, 2022.
 
26.
MILLETT J.D., SIMON H.A. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. Political Science Quarterly. 62 (4), 621, 1947. https://doi.org/10.2307/214490....
 
27.
LI X., WU T., ZHANG H., YANG D. Digital Technology Adoption and Sustainable Development Performance of Strategic Emerging Industries. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing. 34 (8), 1, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.....
 
28.
LIU H., LI S. The Impact of Urban Digital Economy Development on Manufacturing Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from Chinese Listed Manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Empirical Economics. 2 (2), 2023. https://doi.org/10.1142/S28109....
 
29.
LIU C., LI X. The impact of environmental regulations on the green and low-carbon development of high-carbon manufacturing industries - the regulatory effect based on digital technology. Journal of Capital University of Economics and Business. 25 (3), 18, 2023.
 
30.
ESCRIG-OLMEDO E., RIVERA-LIRIO J.M., MUÑOZ-TORRES M.J., FERNÁNDEZ-IZQUIERDO M.Á. Integrating multiple ESG investors' preferences into sustainable investment: A fuzzy multicriteria methodological approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. 162, 1334, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
31.
HUANG Q., YU Y., ZHANG S. Internet Development and Manufacturing Productivity Improvement: Internal Mechanisms and China's Experience. China Industrial Economics. 8, 5, 2019.
 
32.
GUO F., WANG J., WANG F., KONG T., ZHANG X., CHENG Z. Measuring the development of digital financial inclusion in China: Index compilation and spatial characteristics. China Economic Quarterly. 19 (4), 1401, 2020.
 
33.
LI X., HU Y., SHI W. A preliminary study on the top-level system design of ESG reporting in my country. Securities Market Herald. 4, 35, 2022.
 
34.
LI Z., LI C. Banking Competition, Financing Constraints, and Firm Innovation. School of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law. 10, 98, 2019.
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top